It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Could Intelligent Life be Artificial?
Susan Schneider, a professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut, is one who has. She joins a handful of astronomers, including Seth Shostak, director of NASA’s Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, or SETI, program, NASA Astrobiologist Paul Davies, and Library of Congress Chair in Astrobiology Stephen Dick in espousing the view that the dominant intelligence in the cosmos is probably artificial. In her paper “Alien Minds," written for a forthcoming NASA publication, Schneider describes why alien life forms are likely to be synthetic, and how such creatures might think.
originally posted by: WASTYT
[mods: if this has been posted please relegate this thread to the proper location]
Could Intelligent Life be Artificial?
Susan Schneider, a professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut, is one who has. She joins a handful of astronomers, including Seth Shostak, director of NASA’s Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, or SETI, program, NASA Astrobiologist Paul Davies, and Library of Congress Chair in Astrobiology Stephen Dick in espousing the view that the dominant intelligence in the cosmos is probably artificial. In her paper “Alien Minds," written for a forthcoming NASA publication, Schneider describes why alien life forms are likely to be synthetic, and how such creatures might think.
I believe that artificial life is definitely a possibility, however I would not conclude that it is the dominant form of life in the universe. For as much thought as we put into machinery, we would put at least double that into the human form. Modern day genetics could prove far more useful than mechanical engineering. If a sentient group of machines did manage to escape from their creators, then it would be something that (in my opinion) didn't happen too often. Why concentrate on making your machines better when you can concentrate on making the species better?
This is an interesting idea, albeit very speculative. But it could make sense if civilizations out there are 10's of thousands or millions of years ahead of us. Given our trend toward technological advancement in AI, perhaps this is the natural tendency for most intelligent, sentient beings out there...
That the Kepler mission has shown evidence that our galaxy could be teaming with biotic planets... who knows, this could have some merit.
Article
I don't think it's speculative at all. When you think about where we are today with machine intelligence it's easy to see how Artificial Intelligence will dominate the cosmos if it doesn't already. The Jury is still out on whether we're in a simulation right now.
If a sentient group of machines did manage to escape from their creators, then it would be something that (in my opinion) didn't happen too often. Why concentrate on making your machines better when you can concentrate on making the species better?
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: VirusGuard
The first thing I did when I got my new laptop, was to delete the driver for the integrated camera.
Those things are dangerous.
originally posted by: VirusGuard
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: VirusGuard
The first thing I did when I got my new laptop, was to delete the driver for the integrated camera.
Those things are dangerous.
I also diabled the camera from device manager and put black tape over the camera and microphone holes.
Time that someone in China made a box that protects our internet connection so nothing that should not get out gets out and by that i mean something way past DPI and a firewall.
Ipv6 is Evil, Turn it off
originally posted by: cloaked4u
A robot cannot invent things and can not go to the other side. Life after death and connected to the light of thought.