It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BillyTheCat
Yeah...I wasn't going to ruin the ending! OK...as you now know....the Covanant and Humans end up working together. So who do the Zombies represent? We also have a power struggle within the Covanant, who would this be?.
Why am I even trying to relate this?
Originally posted by Croat56
Originally posted by BillyTheCat
Yeah...I wasn't going to ruin the ending! OK...as you now know....the Covanant and Humans end up working together. So who do the Zombies represent? We also have a power struggle within the Covanant, who would this be?.
Why am I even trying to relate this?
Maybe the FLOOD represent the FRENCH. Also who would the Brutes and the forerunners represent?
Originally posted by thematrix
Civilization is thought to have started in the Iraqi region, ...
Our archeologists are mainly active in that region too, when researching early civilizations.
Read the books if you want to know the story.
The 2nd game folows the 1st game because the game series are created after and in paralel with the book storyline.
Theres no more agenda to the story then Tom Clancy's books have. Its fiction.
Originally posted by faddinglight
Its a nice game, vary graphical, but I can't see it being anymore than a game. Like another said, its fiction... Perhaps one of us should approach a dev or two...
Originally posted by Mr Lukas
erm..... i dont wanna interupt anything but .... shouldnt we be debating conspiracys and the such?.. but yeah anyway.. halo 2 did suck
Cool8man
Hey guys,
Let me be really clear about this: there is no intentional political message in Halo2, anti-Bush or otherwise.
While I tried to be mindful of folks' sensitivities as I wrote its story, I knew that the game was going to scrutinized by a large, diverse audience, and would, therefore, be interpreted (or mis-interpreted, as the case may be) any number of different ways.
The EW journalist chose to include one of my examples of possible misinterpretation in the article, but not all of them. Most importantly, the journalist left out my closing statement: "Look, you can read anything into the story that you like - call a damning condemnation of the Bush Admnistration's adventure in the Middle-East, for example. But you'd be wrong."
In retrospect, It would have been best to give no example at all, but hindsight is 20-20.
Long story short: while we didn't water-down Halo2's story in an impossible effort to make it inoffensive to everyone, we were nonetheless careful not to do anything that would be patently offensive regardless of someone's perspective (e.g. reward people for injuring or killing the game's female characters, something most folks would agree is offensive, full-stop).
Halo2's story is non-partisan. Any meaning you ascribe to it is yours alone.
And remember, at the end of the day, whatever some journalist says I said really doesn't matter. The proof is in the pudding. Play the game, and I think you'll see it's just that: a fun game with a good story.
Thanks,
Joseph Staten
Director of Cinematics
Bungie Studios137 posted on 11/08/2004 5:37:17 PM PST by bungiefella
I'm glad to know they're coming out and fighting this rumor, otherwise Microsoft and Bungie were going to end up on many people's ****lists very quickly. :p