It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
One thing to remember that the media will almost always leave out:
Marijuana metabolites stay in your system for a month, sometimes longer. However, marijuana itself, the effects only last a few hours.
Thus, it is totally possible to test positive for weed even if you aren't high, and haven't smoked it in a while. Testing positive for marijuana does not mean that you are under the influence, only that you have smoked it sometime within the last few weeks.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
One thing to remember that the media will almost always leave out:
Marijuana metabolites stay in your system for a month, sometimes longer. However, marijuana itself, the effects only last a few hours.
Thus, it is totally possible to test positive for weed even if you aren't high, and haven't smoked it in a while. Testing positive for marijuana does not mean that you are under the influence, only that you have smoked it sometime within the last few weeks.
This is false. Some tests only detect recent use, within a few hours. What test was performed is critical information.
Marijuana and DUI Laws: How Can We Best Guard Against Impaired Driving?
What is the threshold for considering a driver to be impaired by marijuana? It is unclear what blood level of THC (the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana) constitutes actual impairment. Most credible scientists working on the issue acknowledge the difficulty of pegging THC impairment to a number (in a way similar to drunk driving laws), and epidemiological evidence on the risk of accidents associated with marijuana is much less conclusive than data regarding alcohol.
The most meaningful recent study measuring driver "culpability" (i.e., who is at fault) in 3,400 crashes over a 10-year period indicated that drivers with THC concentrations of less than five ng/mL in their blood have a crash risk no higher than that of drug-free users.2 The crash risk begins to rise above the risk for sober drivers when a marijuana user's THC concentrations in whole blood3 reach five to 10 ng/mL.
How long does it take for the psychoactive effects of marijuana to wear off?
Because smoked THC is rapidly transferred into the blood stream, THC levels in the blood rise quickly immediately after inhalation. Depending on the dose, THC typically reaches peak concentrations of more than 100 ng/mL five to 10 minutes after inhalation and then rapidly decreases to between one and four ng/mL within three to four hours.
However, heavy marijuana users’ blood can contain detectable amounts of THC even after periods of abstention. In one controlled study, six of 25 participants tested positive for active levels of THC after a full seven days of abstention, with the highest concentration detected being three ng/ml of whole blood.4 In addition, the blood serum of heavy to moderate users may contain more than two ng/mL of THC at 24 or even 48 hours after smoking a single joint, a level that studies have shown does not produce impairment.5
Because of the invasiveness of blood tests and the inadequacy of urine tests in determining impairment on the roadside (i.e., actual THC levels), police officials hope to institute roadside saliva testing in the near future. However, the technology for reliably testing saliva is still unavailable, and there are no national standards for testing saliva, as there are with blood and urine.
Significant work is being done to develop and implement modified field sobriety tests, which measure the behavior of drivers (reaction time, for example), rather than their bodily fluids.
MPP recommends a policy similar to most state laws on driving under the influence of alcohol: A driver who fails a roadside sobriety test should be required to submit to a blood test by a trained medical professional — or risk criminal and administrative sanctions. However, given the length of time after impairment THC can stay in a person’s system, no conviction for driving under the influence of marijuana should be based on a per se limit.
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
One thing to remember that the media will almost always leave out:
Marijuana metabolites stay in your system for a month, sometimes longer. However, marijuana itself, the effects only last a few hours.
Thus, it is totally possible to test positive for weed even if you aren't high, and haven't smoked it in a while. Testing positive for marijuana does not mean that you are under the influence, only that you have smoked it sometime within the last few weeks.
This is false. Some tests only detect recent use, within a few hours. What test was performed is critical information.
What tests are those that can distinguish being currently under the influence, and having used previously?
MPP recommends a policy similar to most state laws on driving under the influence of alcohol: A driver who fails a roadside sobriety test should be required to submit to a blood test