It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
a reply to: SourGrapes
If you think the cop was right, that's your opinion, I bet you have tons of black friends....On facebook...
Yep, I sure do! In real life too. Not sure how the race of my friends (or, my race) has anything to do with my post. And, it doesn't really matter what I think of the cop; as the evidence proves who is in the "right".
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
a reply to: thesaneone
Can you show me evidence you don't live under a bridge and don't let anyone pass without the answer to your idiotic riddles?
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
a reply to: DenyObfuscation
Nope just articles which is no better evidence than the opposing side... But their is evidence he was shot multiple times, which is even more crazy.
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
a reply to: DenyObfuscation
Nope just articles which is no better evidence than the opposing side... But their is evidence he was shot multiple times, which is even more crazy.
But no evidence he was shot in the back?? Okay cool.
originally posted by: TXRabbit
I agree to many extents.
If there was ever any concern about violence, backlash, riots or injury, they could have simply posted the verdict on the web and let people read and review. Instead we get this dog-n-pony show LIVE on CNN!
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: 3u40r15m
a reply to: DenyObfuscation
Nope just articles which is no better evidence than the opposing side... But their is evidence he was shot multiple times, which is even more crazy.
But no evidence he was shot in the back?? Okay cool.
Also no evidence he attacked the cop? Great...