It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes. In order to lend credibility to his musings. Some people want their ideas to be accepted for acceptance sake. Some people are not beyond "embellishment" to accomplish that. Some people will do "odd" things to accomplish that. Like endorsing John Hutchinson.
you think hes out there to deceive fpp?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: funbox
Yes. In order to lend credibility to his musings. Some people want their ideas to be accepted for acceptance sake. Some people are not beyond "embellishment" to accomplish that. Some people will do "odd" things to accomplish that. Like endorsing John Hutchinson.
you think hes out there to deceive fpp?
If your message involves anti-gravity, yes it does. At least for those who don't know better.
in my mind using the pipe trick lends no credence in validating your overall message
Where did I address his intellectual capacity? You wouldn't be resorting to a strawman argument or a diversion, would you?
I give the guy more intellectual capacity than you do , obviously
Where did I address his intellectual capacity? You wouldn't be resorting to a strawman argument or a diversion, would you?
Yes. In order to lend credibility to his musings. Some people
In the mid-1990s, he began to write about his investigations regarding innovative technologies that allegedly utilize energy sources that science does not currently recognize (also called "new energy"), and how those technologies can transform the planet and the human journey.[54][55] He believed there is an extraterrestrial presence on Earth, its relationship to those potentially transformative technologies, and their conjoined organized suppression.[56] He participated in the Face on Mars debate.[57][58]
originally posted by: funbox
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
and here's me thinking Boyd was one of your favorites ... shame on you..
any new slant on his removal from pissy-pedia >?
funbox
Mr. Cates,
Now, I can respond better to your questions.
I met Mr. Bushman while I was working at Lockheed-Martin where I believe
he held the position of Division Scientist. I found him to be a
highly-knowledgeable and helpful person. (I understand that his educational
background is in the field of Physics as is mine.) He spent most of his
time developing and working on various very advanced classified projects. I
know that he was, and is, held in high regard by those both associated with
him and for whom he worked. As you no doubt have discovered, he has been
awarded several patents, including the one that you mentioned with me.
He is a highly knowledgeable scientist who is willing to go boldly forth
and examine just about any subject, including a lot of those that most
scientists shun. (Unfortunately, this tendency sometimes leads people to
question his credentials.) However, from time to time, he develops really
valuable & significant products. He is, in fact, an individual with
extensive knowledge and capabilities and one with which I frequently discuss
the more mundane work that I engage in.
I hope that the above is helpful to you.
Kirston Henderson
MegaRail®
I don't know what an fpp is but his trick obviously fooled people into thinking it was some mysterious effect. When it isn't.
what type of intellectual capacity would use something as easily disprovable as the pipe trick to fool a group such a fpp's
You mean he's not a very good magician? I didn't say anything about his mental capacity. Stop claiming I did.
by thinking that his reasoning of using the pipetrick to add credence to his overall story you suggest that his mental capacity at deception is , at least very low
Perhaps trying too hard to read something into what I have said. There is no need to. It's quite clear what my point is.
am I not reading you very well..?
I said he was deceiving his target audience.
weird why did you say yes to my question about him trying to deceive fpp, my assertion to your asaid audience to the storey ? would have saved a lot of unnecessary misunderstanding, may I ask what you thought I meant ?
Those who believe that UFOs are extraterrestrials visiting Earth and that any statements which support that idea are valid. That is the less than discerning audience I spoke of.
what audience did you really mean if I was reading you wrong?
I said he was deceiving his target audience.
When the claim began to gain traction on the internet, a Reddit user located an existing toy that very closely resembled the "alien" in the Bushman video: