It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: MALBOSIA
A few hundred miles of wiring....no matter what method used, there would be a few hundred miles of it. And yes, it would be distinctive from normal electrical wiring.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Sorry I missed you Bruce, I am usually not online during your shift. Maybe this weekend...
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Anyway. We hit a dead end.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Sorry I missed you Bruce, I am usually not online during your shift. Maybe this weekend...
Funny how you ignored my question, because you know it totally destroys your silly conspiracy theory....
You have zero evidence the buildings were wired up with explosives, so you just make nonsense up!
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Anyway. We hit a dead end.
That is because there is no evidence at all that the buildings were wired up with explosives, no one noticed the tonnes of explosives being smuggled in, no one noticed the holes knocked in walls, the km of wire needed.
You think you can blow buildings up by someone running around sticking a few egg timers to the walls, as you get your information from James Bond movies!
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
but I am talking about the real not so simple world where it is very very very possible and quite likely explosives were used.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
but I am talking about the real not so simple world where it is very very very possible and quite likely explosives were used.
So you think silent explosives were used, as there were no sounds because the buildings started falling, so you know nothing ay all about building demolition, not knowing that thousands of man hours, hundreds of km of cable, tonnes of explosives, many holes knocked in walls.... which nobody at all noticed.
You really are living in fairy land!
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
OMG! What silence??
The silence made by tonnes of explosives going exploding.... You really have no idea at all how loud tonnes of explosives going off is!
And I'm living in fairy land?
Very true, with your silent explosives!
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: MALBOSIA. He was pointing out that HAD explosives been used, there would have been an unmistakable BOOM-BOOM-BOOM (x10,000). That, we did not hear. More proof that there were no explosives that day.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
A building the size of the twin towers has never been imploded before.
That means you can not exclude explosives because this specific application would have never been done before. IF explosives were used...
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Was evidence of explosives looked for?
what would the investigators be looking for? You KNOW how they would do it and what they would use?
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
OMG! What silence?? A 100 story building was collapsing and you describe it as silent. And I'm living in fairy land?
Any person interested in truth would just admit that in every video of an explosive driven collapse, the explosives are WAY louder than the building they are collapsing.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
In a normal CD, all the windows, furniture, carpeting, drywall etc. has been removed beforehand which would greatly affect the noise levels.