Liberal 2016 poll: Elizabeth Warren beating Clinton by double digits

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: tavi45

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: xuenchen
I think Elizabeth Warren would make a wonderful Presidential candidate.

Wonder which party would back her?

She will be the Democrats version of Sarah Palin.

You're equating Warren with Palin?

Yes. That is exactly what I did.

Someone extremely offensive to many even though she has strong support within her core constituency. The main difference will be that the MSM won't vilify her like they did Palin because she is a liberal.

really?....that's THE MAIN DIFFERENCE??...*snip*?

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: tavi45

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: xuenchen
I think Elizabeth Warren would make a wonderful Presidential candidate.

Wonder which party would back her?

She will be the Democrats version of Sarah Palin.

You're equating Warren with Palin?

Yes. That is exactly what I did.

Someone extremely offensive to many even though she has strong support within her core constituency. The main difference will be that the MSM won't vilify her like they did Palin because she is a liberal.

really?....that's THE MAIN DIFFERENCE??...what have you been smoking?

They are both political tools and I don't want either one of them in charge.

originally posted by: Metallicus
Yes. That is exactly what I did.

Someone extremely offensive to many even though she has strong support within her core constituency. The main difference will be that the MSM won't vilify her like they did Palin because she is a liberal.

Politicians are always extremely offensive to some and supported by their constituency. That's politics.

Nobody vilified Palin. She was an idiot. She is still an idiot. She vilified herself by speaking publicly about, well, anything and everything.

The only thing similar about Palin and Warren is they are both female and they are in politics. Aside from that, nothing.

a reply to: mOjOm

They are both idiots in my opinion. Palin being an idiot and Warren being an idiot aren't mutually exclusive things.

originally posted by: mOjOm


This may be the first time Poll Data reflected some actual Intelligence coming from the populace. IMO a Warren/Sanders team might be the only chance to get this nation back to helping people rather than the Corporate Billionaire Aristocracy.

Accomplishing such a task is of course impossible to predict but if it's possible at all that is the only place I can imagine it would come from. Everyone else from every party seems to be comfortably in the pocket of some multinational corporatist.

With some decent candidates running for congress we could make a big change.

Naw the TPTB could never allow a regime change they had not sanctioned, remember Ron Paul's last attempt.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: butcherguy

They're both Wiccan?

No. I was thinking Wizard of Oz Wicked Witch of the West.
I apologize to Wiccans.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: mOjOm

They are both idiots in my opinion. Palin being an idiot and Warren being an idiot aren't mutually exclusive things.

I don't consider Warren to be an idiot though. She's actually a very intelligent and capable woman and formal Law Professor. Not that I really like the fact that she's a lawyer exactly, but that's because of my own bias against lawyers in general.

Palin was in fact just kind of a ding bat.

a reply to: butcherguy

Yeah, you're still not getting it. Using witch as an insult when witches aren't a bad thing... is offensive to witches (wiccans, pagans). You mean, bitches... say so.

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Oh yah, I remember. Perhaps though if both of them were out there it would be harder to suppress their exposure. Many people had never heard of Ron Paul at the time and they just had to keep him out of the news, debates, etc. so nobody learned about him. Warren and Sanders are already known and out there so it would be more difficult to suppress knowledge of them.

As bad as it is to say, it would also be twice as difficult to knock off both of them too should TPTB decide to go that far as well. The fact that I even mention that with some seriousness just shows what a big sh*t pool we're all swimming in.

I have been listening to the crap that Warren has been spewing.

It is the SAME CRAP that put the current guy in the oval office.

They are really going after the sexist angle for the next election.

After 6 years of YOUR RACIST!

Now 2016 and after will be all about YOUR SEXIST !!!!

For crying outl oud the right needs to get their snip together, and give us a real choice.

a reply to: mOjOm

 don't consider Warren to be an idiot though. She's actually a very intelligent and capable woman and formal Law Professor

Native American too.
Or has she backed off of that claim?

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: butcherguy

Yeah, you're still not getting it. Using witch as an insult when witches aren't a bad thing... is offensive to witches (wiccans, pagans). You mean, bitches... say so.

No... I get your point just fine.
I am just not politically correct enough for you. Witch is an acceptable synonym for an evil woman.
Some witches are evil.

a reply to: mOjOm

I find it sad that our current system exempts the other parties from presidential debates; I would love to see Sanders elected as an independent rather than a D.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: butcherguy

Yeah, you're still not getting it. Using witch as an insult when witches aren't a bad thing... is offensive to witches (wiccans, pagans). You mean, bitches... say so.

PC police to the rescue. /sigh

a reply to: butcherguy

I guess the only people that are allowed to be called witches are the ones with R by their names.

Like that woman from Delaware.

Christine O'Donnel I think it was.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: butcherguy

They're both Wiccan?

No, they're both women and he figures it's an opportunity to insult them... As appropriate as saying something like "Ted Cruz and Joe Biden are both warlocks"... It just doesn't have the same "sting" as when one insults women...

a reply to: AlaskanDad

This is really good news! Bernie is ahead of Hillary? I like that!

a reply to: butcherguy

No witches are evil. I'm not being PC... you're choosing to be deliberately offensive.

a reply to: AlaskanDad

I'd like to see him beat Hillary in the Primary. People are too nervous still to vote 3rd party, as much as I would like to see that too.

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: tavi45

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: xuenchen
I think Elizabeth Warren would make a wonderful Presidential candidate.

Wonder which party would back her?

She will be the Democrats version of Sarah Palin.

You're equating Warren with Palin?

Yes. That is exactly what I did.

Someone extremely offensive to many even though she has strong support within her core constituency. The main difference will be that the MSM won't vilify her like they did Palin because she is a liberal.

Lol. Since when is being liberal protection from the MSM? That's utterly and completely untrue. They skewer liberals all the time, especially Fox the republican propaganda arm.

More importantly though Warren is completely unlike Palin. She's highly educated and not a half retarded bigot who runs her mouth without using her brain at all. She also hasn't robbed her stringer supporters to improve her personal life. She's also not a fame seeker.

When people knock Warren they aren't knocking her but the D attached to her. She is incredibly uncorrupted and fights for the ideals of Americans. She's been fighting for the middle class for decades.

I just wish you staunch Republicans could see past your bias and see how great she would be for our country.

Why exactly is she so offensive anyways? I mean besides her stance on woman's rights and gay rights.

Double post