It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gfad
a reply to: Zaphod58
... atmospheric reflections like the authors conclude.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: gfad
a reply to: Zaphod58
... atmospheric reflections like the authors conclude.
Now, imagine if you were above that atmospheric layer. Where would a sonic boom reflect to then? Wouldn't it bounce off that boundary layer and reflect upwards? That would be a great way to silence them, now wouldn't it? A fast platform, flying above those layers would never be heard....at least not at the surface.
originally posted by: themadgenius
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: gfad
a reply to: Zaphod58
... atmospheric reflections like the authors conclude.
Now, imagine if you were above that atmospheric layer. Where would a sonic boom reflect to then? Wouldn't it bounce off that boundary layer and reflect upwards? That would be a great way to silence them, now wouldn't it? A fast platform, flying above those layers would never be heard....at least not at the surface.
No. Anything within Earth's Atomsphere can be heard. It may not be able to be heard by a Human, though, it could be detected by a different type of sensor.
I
originally posted by: Krakatoa
Now, imagine if you were above that atmospheric layer. Where would a sonic boom reflect to then? Wouldn't it bounce off that boundary layer and reflect upwards? That would be a great way to silence them, now wouldn't it? A fast platform, flying above those layers would never be heard....at least not at the surface.
I think they are doing that on purpose when she away from home to scare the bejezzus out of a few foreign troublemakers. Since I don't believe she needs to do that the entire flight. But can on command. It's her way of saying "hi jerks...i seeeee what you're up to, knock it off." or "look what we got nah nah na-nah nah!!!"
originally posted by: EBJet
There are clues and certain info regarding this out there in vague forms if you do some digging..I'd be delighted to share more, but as others have pointed out, Orange jumpsuits aren't my thing either..I will say though, that it is in no way whatsoever related to what is being called the Green Flame..
originally posted by: EBJet
a reply to: keeley
No, it is not...Something entirely different, as well as different to what BASSPLYR saw whilst lounging in his folks' jacuzzi..
originally posted by: boomer135
This is somewhat true. Only difference is Manas had a supply of JP-7 not alot of people knew about and yes we refueled an aircraft that used JP-7. But we didn't land at another base to refuel on the ground and take off again to refuel said aircraft.
We loved flying T models just for the extra spotlight on the tail that shined down. but when my time was coming to an end in the Air Force they started getting rid of them for some reason.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: boomer135
This is somewhat true. Only difference is Manas had a supply of JP-7 not alot of people knew about and yes we refueled an aircraft that used JP-7. But we didn't land at another base to refuel on the ground and take off again to refuel said aircraft.
We loved flying T models just for the extra spotlight on the tail that shined down. but when my time was coming to an end in the Air Force they started getting rid of them for some reason.
First, you tease!
Having a small supply of JP-7 at Manas does explain all the fuel panel lockouts we would find in random places. Though I think the fuel supply dried up or was not used in 2007 onwards. I dont remember on any of my deployments a lockout panel being used or a "special fueling". Maybe they switched to the deid? I never had the pleasure of spending time there.
OH, and those extra blubs in the tail... not fun to change.
originally posted by: EBJet
It wasn't over LA per se, but a bit to the North...Way too high and fast to see, and it would not be leaving any sort of contrail, no matter what altitude..
originally posted by: EBJet
a reply to: keeley
Speaking specifically to what caused the "skyquakes" in the early-mid 90's, I would say yes, add that one to the list, because it (and what it eventually developed into) is a different animal altogether.