It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
COMPLETELY frivilous lawsuits such as the woman who bought coffee then spilled it on her lap then sued the store that sold her the coffee because it was too hot.
originally posted by: chuck258
a reply to: TheSpanishArcher
I don't know where it was, and I have heard this story in several different versions, from it being coffee from McDonalds to being from 7 eleven. The jist of the story was the woman sued them because she had the coffee in her lap in the car (between her legs) and one way or another, the lid popped off and scalding hot coffee burned her inner thighs and genitals, she may have gotten into a car accident.
Either way, you would think the average person would know that coffee is made with extremely hot water, and would have the common sense not to put it in her lap in a cardboard/paper cup with a thin plastic lid. Today, after changing the brakes on my car I heard what sounded like the rotors dragging on the pads after taking it for a test drive, my dumb ass touched the rotor because I saw some brake pad debris and burned my finger. If I were this woman, I would have sued Ford for not telling me the rotor was going to be hot after rolling down a hill testing the brakes.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Insane lawsuit. I hope it gets thrown out. Any lawyer who took this case should be shamed out of the business, IMO.
On pitbulls... it's NOT the breed. It's the owner and how the dog is raised. They are actually precious and sweet dogs. But the owner has to know what they're doing and take responsibility for how their dogs are, regardless of the breed. This owner clearly has a problem meeting the needs of her dogs. If they were raised as fighting dogs, they absolutely can be rehabilitated, but it takes work.
I can't believe people still think that pitbulls are inherently dangerous dogs... It's just ignorance.
On the pitbulls biting the owners... when a dog (ANY dog) is in the heightened state of a fight with another dog, any distraction will be perceived as a threat and the dog will likely redirect its bite to the human. It's not like they DECIDE to bite the owner. It's an instinct.
People who don't understand dogs shouldn't have them.
originally posted by: queenofswords
Every pit bull owner says the same thing...."it's not the dog, it's the way they are raised". Baloney!
All dogs can bite, but when a pit bites, it won't let go till there is death. I have researched this topic in the past because I know of several incidents personally regarding this breed where a person or other animal was attacked without provocation by a pit bull. You always hear the owner say something like "oh, he's the sweetest dog I have ever owned...he wouldn't hurt a flea....he has never done anything like this before!"
They are unpredictable and when they do decide to attack, they latch on and don't let go. It turns my stomach to hear people defend them at the expense of the safety of a child or other pet. They don't get a bad rap for no reason as many of their owners will claim.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: queenofswords
Wrong, just because you did searches that were probably slanted against pitbulls does not make it truth. I have already said multiple times I have seen and have broken up several dog fights where pitbulls are involved. Pitbulls don't "lock" their jaw, they just have a very strong bite. However, pitbulls actually have a weaker bite than Rottweilers, Dobermans, Mastiffs and GERMAN SHEPHERDS.
I'd like to know how the bite power was scientifically measured.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Insane lawsuit. I hope it gets thrown out. Any lawyer who took this case should be shamed out of the business, IMO.
On pitbulls... it's NOT the breed. It's the owner and how the dog is raised. They are actually precious and sweet dogs. But the owner has to know what they're doing and take responsibility for how their dogs are, regardless of the breed. This owner clearly has a problem meeting the needs of her dogs. If they were raised as fighting dogs, they absolutely can be rehabilitated, but it takes work.
I can't believe people still think that pitbulls are inherently dangerous dogs... It's just ignorance.
On the pitbulls biting the owners... when a dog (ANY dog) is in the heightened state of a fight with another dog, any distraction will be perceived as a threat and the dog will likely redirect its bite to the human. It's not like they DECIDE to bite the owner. It's an instinct.
People who don't understand dogs shouldn't have them.
We don't know what it says in the actual lawsuit. I would guess that it contains things not dealt with in the news story. As for pit bulls, I agree with you. Raised with love and kindness, they're wonderful dogs. People believe that pit bulls are inherently because of the media.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: chuck258
a problem with dogs is once they have been blooded they change and cannot really be trusted.....sadly for these animals being put down might just be necessary
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a problem with dogs is once they have been blooded they change and cannot really be trusted..
originally posted by: Grovit
i would guess he is trying to say once they have tasted blood they will not be the same...they will want more blood.
People fail to understand that dogs are carnivorous predators. They are supposed to "have a taste for meat."
...
The dog is, by nature, a predator, and will chase other animals because it is hard-wired to do so, not because it is bloodthirsty or has a taste for meat in the human definition of the words.
...
Humans were the ones that deemed the killing behavior as inappropriate and unwanted. Humans tend to expect dogs to exhibit only the delightful behaviors that benefit us, and to act as little humans in fur coats. But when the dog acts in accordance to its canine behavior, some people get upset and think the animal is "messed up" or is a "bad dog." They do not work through the behavior and do not teach the dog the desirable behavior or get it treated homeopathically for vaccinosis issues (such as excessive fear and aggression), and then chain it in the backyard or dump it at a shelter.
originally posted by: ItCameFromOuterSpace
a reply to: chuck258
All pit bull owners should have to register their dogs as dangerous and be ridiculed by society. Pit bulls shouldn't even be allowed within city limits. There's no need to have these kinds of animals.
originally posted by: coastlinekid
If you are referring to the Mcdonalds lawsuit,(blog.3nips.com...) the coffee WAS way too hot... a business is responsible for it's product...when a business serves coffee that is expected to be hot that is justified, but when a business sells coffee that is BOILING/SCALDING... THAT IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE...
just sayin...
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: queenofswords
Every pit bull owner says the same thing...."it's not the dog, it's the way they are raised". Baloney!
All dogs can bite, but when a pit bites, it won't let go till there is death. I have researched this topic in the past because I know of several incidents personally regarding this breed where a person or other animal was attacked without provocation by a pit bull. You always hear the owner say something like "oh, he's the sweetest dog I have ever owned...he wouldn't hurt a flea....he has never done anything like this before!"
They are unpredictable and when they do decide to attack, they latch on and don't let go. It turns my stomach to hear people defend them at the expense of the safety of a child or other pet. They don't get a bad rap for no reason as many of their owners will claim.
I'll bet you believe their jaws lock. Rubbish.