It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: sheepslayer247
So now fox is all of a sudden credible with this story? Both news sites do a great job dividing this country along with MSNBC..they are all dividists...yes not a real word but fitting
Can you prove where the story is NOT true?
Whether you like the source or not , doesnt mean the information is false........
The trick to the whole truth thing, is to remain objective through our own biases
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: sheepslayer247
If you look at my reply, it was clear who i was replying to bud....I even quoted them
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: the owlbear
But no Republicans voted for PPACA in the House or Senate.
The Democrats *OWN* Obama.Care (the leftover Democrats that is).
The newREDS will pass changes and Obama will veto.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: sheepslayer247
They are her own words.........
Im not sure how much more proof you need then that
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: the owlbear
But no Republicans voted for PPACA in the House or Senate.
The Democrats *OWN* Obama.Care (the leftover Democrats that is).
The newREDS will pass changes and Obama will veto.
How many abstained?
The House has been in repug control for quite a while now. They can feign resistance, but plenty of their golf buddies are getting paid now. The insurance racket knows no color. Just green.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: sheepslayer247
They are her own words.........
Im not sure how much more proof you need then that
Do you believe everything you are told by a MSM talking head?
So much for objectivity..........
originally posted by: Gryphon66
So, she worked at CNBC from 2003 to December 2011. She covered the stock market mostly.
January 2012 she joined FBN.
And she's saved up this little chestnut for two and a half years? At FOX? Does that make sense to anyone?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Gryphon66
So, she worked at CNBC from 2003 to December 2011. She covered the stock market mostly.
January 2012 she joined FBN.
And she's saved up this little chestnut for two and a half years? At FOX? Does that make sense to anyone?
When she left CNBC, she must have signed a non-competition "gag" clause that has expired by now.