It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
When investigating claims, I wonder how many people ask themselves whether what they are doing is important.
For example, for the sake of argument, let's just take it as given that this is in fact a video of an extraterrestrial craft. What can we hope to learn from this video? Why is this grainy video of a streak across the sky important to continue study?
In zoology, for example, not every out of focus picture of animals is important, so why is every blurry picture of a supposed alien craft important?
I don't think this image is evidence of anything, even if it is a picture of an extraterrestrial craft.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
I'm not sure why those are my only choices. Here is my breakdown.
1. regular old plane. I have seen other planes passing while on a plane and they look just like that except they are more in focus. 95%
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: AgentShillington
In zoology, for example, not every out of focus picture of animals is important
Unless its of bigfoot.
I don't think this image is evidence of anything, even if it is a picture of an extraterrestrial craft.
well, if you throw this in the pile of "evidence", it will somehow increase the odds of ET visitation. So its important for people that can't do math.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: AgentShillington
When investigating claims, I wonder how many people ask themselves whether what they are doing is important.
For example, for the sake of argument, let's just take it as given that this is in fact a video of an extraterrestrial craft. What can we hope to learn from this video? Why is this grainy video of a streak across the sky important to continue study?
In zoology, for example, not every out of focus picture of animals is important, so why is every blurry picture of a supposed alien craft important?
I don't think this image is evidence of anything, even if it is a picture of an extraterrestrial craft.
Sure that's a good question. I have my reasons that I'll get to. But you spend a decent amount of time on these forums, mostly debunking such claims from what I have seen.......which certainly is your right, so why do you think debunking such claims is a valuable use of your time? Do you really care so much about what anonymous strangers think?
For me it is important for this - if ET's exist and they are interacting with our planet, and from what I have seen that is definitely the case - why is the government keeping it secret? People have a right to know the truth, good or bad.
The world lived with the specter of nuclear holocaust for 50 years, what could possibly be worse than nuclear Armageddon? If the ET presence has dire implications, people have the right to know, and they for the most part can handle the truth. The ones that would be upset, well, if they are like that they will eventually find something in their lives to upset them anyway.
I would like to influence those who are open minded to see the truth.
originally posted by: draknoir2
a reply to: AgentShillington
Bigfoot is real.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: draknoir2
a reply to: AgentShillington
Bigfoot is real.
Take it to the cryptozoology forum, mate. I'm not interested in discussing it, and if I were, that's where I'd go.
I can have a wall of evidence to the existence of Santa Claus, and none of it means that Santa Claus is real, it just means I have a lot of evidence suggesting he is real.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: AgentShillington
I can have a wall of evidence to the existence of Santa Claus, and none of it means that Santa Claus is real, it just means I have a lot of evidence suggesting he is real.
What about unicorns?
Glad you can be open to the alien possibility no matter how remote!
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: AgentShillington
I am pretty sure he is being sarcastic...
So, your answer to critical thinking is to bury your head in the sand and ask rhetorical questions?
This is exactly why I want to educate with my posts, because responses like yours are troubling to anyone looking for the truth in ANYTHING.
And don't worry, this post wasn't designed to educate you, as I don't see the point in trying to do that anymore. Alas, you aren't the only audience to my posting, and even if I reach one or two, it's a pursuit worth continuing.
Good day.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: AgentShillington
I am pretty sure he is being sarcastic...
So am I. It doesn't change my sentiment, however, because the only purpose of the post was ridicule. And why ridicule? Because critical thinking escaped the mind and what was left was frustration. This forum is composed of a good percentage of frustrated posts made by people with less than desirable critical thinking skills.
Notice I said "skills". These skills are something that can be taught, but only if you are willing to be taught. It is the purest essence of denying ignorance.
iro·ny
noun \ˈī-rə-nē also ˈī(-ə)r-nē\
: the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really think especially in order to be funny
You two seem to have taken personal offense to my posts
I welcome your reasoning, I encourage it. I want to understand why people believe these sorts of videos are going to do anything, especially in the age of easily faked evidence.