Ungrounded Rain (qodesh mem)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick

that is an untested opinion you are making.

No, it is a fact.

The only thing that makes "holy water" holy is a priest waving his hands over it and saying magic words. Before that, it comes out of the tap.

i have already told you how to test what i say.

Dang. I'm all out of bad witches.

someone suffering from prolonged anger will benefit from it. also my theor of it being able to heal atoms could be tested somewhere with radation in soil but the soil would have to be ungrounded also. save your witches

a reply to: Phage

Before that, it comes out of the tap.

Not necessarily. You can get it by mail order.


Dex

originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: Phage

Before that, it comes out of the tap.

Not necessarily. You can get it by mail order.


Dex

I wonder if that container is BPA free.

a reply to: deadeyedick

also my theor of it being able to heal atoms could be tested somewhere with radation in soil but the soil would have to be ungrounded also.

Heal atoms? You mean, like add a proton or neutron to them? Turn them into another element or isotope? Nuclear fusion/fission from "ungrounded" water? Cool!

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick

also my theor of it being able to heal atoms could be tested somewhere with radation in soil but the soil would have to be ungrounded also.

Heal atoms? You mean, like add a proton or neutron to them? Turn them into another element or isotope? Nuclear fusion/fission from "ungrounded" water? Cool!

all that is outta my field of knowledge. the simple thought is contaminated ground in a bowl then put ungrounded rain on it and it will be clean.

a reply to: deadeyedick

the simple thought is contaminated ground in a bowl then put ungrounded rain on it and it will be clean.

Simple question. Where do you think the contamination would go?

Ok, time to put this one to bed. Here is an example of what's in your pre-ionized sky water from many different locations.




If rain didn't have to pass through the atmosphere it might be more magical.

Rainwater Chemistry Across the United States - PDF

originally posted by: deadeyedick
all that is outta my field of knowledge. the simple thought is contaminated ground in a bowl then put ungrounded rain on it and it will be clean.

Oh. Finally, a concrete claim.

You are wrong.

This isn't my opinion, this is scientifically repeatable information.

Putting contaminated ground into a bowl with ungrounded rain will NOT make the material in the bowl clean.

a reply to: eisegesis
They didn't test for magic.
I'm sure that would have been off the scale.

originally posted by: AgentShillington

originally posted by: deadeyedick

all that is outta my field of knowledge. the simple thought is contaminated ground in a bowl then put ungrounded rain on it and it will be clean.

Oh. Finally, a concrete claim.



You are wrong.



This isn't my opinion, this is scientifically repeatable information.



Putting contaminated ground into a bowl with ungrounded rain will NOT make the material in the bowl clean.

hough and you will find i tried to say that in the op and stated i have no gieger counter or contaminated soil.

how often has rain reached contaminated soil that is not grounded?


off topic reasearch has been done on the term finally and the term woo hoo
they found finally is said when someone had faith that it was a matter of time for the outcome and the shout woo hoo is used when the person had doubts the outcome would happen.

a reply to: deadeyedick

I do.

I'm right.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: eisegesis
They didn't test for magic.
I'm sure that would have been off the scale.

Magic is an illusion, ungrounded water is a delusion.

originally posted by: eisegesis

originally posted by: Phage

a reply to: eisegesis

They didn't test for magic.

I'm sure that would have been off the scale.

Magic is an illusion, ungrounded water is a delusion.

no no no
even in scientific understanting you are wrong on that one

it is simply rain that came from the sky but has not touched the ground or found a connected path to the ground

originally posted by: deadeyedick
no no no
even in scientific understanting you are wrong on that one

Stick to unsupportable claims.

Your ignorance is showing.

a reply to: AgentShillington

your answer is above you again and i added a bit to the other reply you may want to poke fun at

a reply to: deadeyedick

I admire the fact that you are hanging in there despite all of the negative feedback from the ATS resident scientists. This is a tough bunch.

Does this ungrounded property apply to all types of precipitation? Are there other environmental factors that may alter the outcome?

Dex

originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: deadeyedick



I admire the fact that you are hanging in there despite all of the negative feedback from the ATS resident scientists. This is a tough bunch.



Does this ungrounded property apply to all types of precipitation? Are there other environmental factors that may alter the outcome?



Dex

It is quiet funny to have scientist debating holy water. to watch them put off such a theory that is very easily testable shows minds closed.
i am not sure bout the rest i came upon the power of the rain from someone possesed and started watching the effects of rain water on them and then pondered how we act when it rains or is about to rain.

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: AgentShillington

your answer is above you again and i added a bit to the other reply you may want to poke fun at

Ungrounded Water isn't a thing.

lmgtfy.com...

Notice that this thread is in the first page of listings.

a reply to: AgentShillington

you can not just will something to not exist. you may not like the terms i put on what i described but it exist. rain from a cloud caught before it hits the ground. it does not matter if we call it shat it still exist and i have a bottle of ungrounded rain. google is not the final source GOD is

what do you think of the question of how much contaminated soil has ever been rained on while it was not connected to the ground? have you ever heard of a silly type of testing like i purpose? neither of us know the outcome yet but we both believe one way or the other.

originally posted by: deadeyedick
what do you think of the question of how much contaminated soil has ever been rained on while it was not connected to the ground?

I think it's a silly meaningless question.