It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It's a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn't matter what they are. They don't get to change the definition."
The co-director of Johns Hopkins University's sexuality studies program is speaking out against his colleague Dr. Ben Carson's recent comments comparing supporters of marriage equality to members of NAMBLA and practitioners of bestiality.
"I don't think most people at Hopkins think what he says on this subject matters," Professor Todd Shepard, co-director of the university's Program for the Study of Women, Gender, and Sexuality, said in a statement to Media Matters. "They make him look nasty, petty, and ill-informed. It doesn't tell us anything about his amazing abilities as a surgeon. It does remind us, however, that those abilities do not mean we should listen to what he says in any other domain."
“As you know, I have been in the national news quite a bit recently and my 36 year association with Johns Hopkins has unfortunately dragged our institution into the spotlight as well. I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” wrote Carson, who is the director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital. “But what really saddens me is that my poorly chosen words caused pain for some members of our community and for that I offer a most sincere and heartfelt apology. Hurting others is diametrically opposed to who I am and what I believe.” […]
“There are many lessons to be learned when venturing into the political world and this is one I will not forget. Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words,” he said
He did retire from surgery last year, but his retirement plans changed.
“Sometimes I realize there are forces greater than me,” he says. “I am an instrument that’s being used to help restore this country.”
originally posted by: buster2010
The politically correct crowd will rip him to shreds. The way he mouths off about gays and how it's a Marxist plot to "gay up" America he is just asking for trouble.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: buster2010
Based on his gun and healthcare views, I would say he looks just like Obama.
"Look, we got us one of those O'Bama's too.", said the GOP.
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: buster2010
The politically correct crowd will rip him to shreds. The way he mouths off about gays and how it's a Marxist plot to "gay up" America he is just asking for trouble.
Meh ... the politically correct crowd is just loud. There aren't 'really' that many of them.
OBTW, that is part of the Marxist Agenda (if memory serves).
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: buster2010
Based on his gun and healthcare views, I would say he looks just like Obama.
"Look, we got us one of those O'Bama's too.", said the GOP.
with Obama's healthcare you have to pay for your insurance not the insurance companies paying for you. Also Obama received an F from the Brady foundation for gun violence which means he is for guns and not restricting them. The gun law people whine about when it comes to Obama was originally passed after Reagan got shot Obama has passed no new laws restricting guns.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Metallicus
You sir, win the thread!
@OP: I'm reserving judgment on this guy at the moment. Though if the claim said earlier in the thread that he doesn't support legal marijuana is true, then he definitely isn't getting my vote. I'm already concerned about his stance on gay marriage and guns. Though not liking the ACA does help him out in my book.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: buster2010
What was the "Marxist Agenda" again?
I keep hearing about it, but never see any valid evidence for it.
Ben Carson said he changed his mind and was against gun registration because "sinister internal forces" could surface in that scenario. He "used to think they needed to be registered, but if you register them they just come and find you and take your guns." He said, "I would never advocate anything to interfere with Second Amendment rights; however, I do think we have to be intelligent" and address situations where people with AK-47s are mowing people down. "We need to discuss, 'Is there something we can do?' We have to keep in mind that law-abiding American citizens absolutely should have gun rights.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen
What an amazingly vague and empty answer, as always, Xuenchen!
Has Dr. Carson ever gone into detail on what he considers the "Marxist Agenda" ... or does he, like most Republicans, use the term as a code phrase for "Democrats."
LOL.