It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: undo
over 30 years ago, preachers in the usa were warning that the breakdown of the family unit is part of the communist platform. here's the trick - the muslim countries overseas are frequently working with communist countries and seem to prefer marxism over any other form of government. so why are we being blamed for suffering from the effects of marxists taking over our country, in every conceivable way possible?
If only...
Could you imagine if the workers of the country controlled the wealth of the country, instead of the few at the top?
Marxist takeover indeed... heh.
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
a reply to: AgentShillington
You used the proper word there (allowed)
Muslim women have no choice.
American women have a choice.
That's why I'm critical of muslims.
This choice by American women has consequences. One being they don't spend as much time with their children. That has drawbacks. In the long run.
Did that help in your confusion?
According to the Quran, men and women have the same spirit, there is no superiority in the spiritual sense between men and women. [Noble Quran 4:1, 7:189, 42:11]
The Quran makes it clear that all human beings (and the phraseology doesn't apply to men or women alone, but to both) have what you might call a human; He
"breathed some of My spirit into divine touch. When God created him"(or her in this sense). [Noble Quran 15:29 See also 32:9]
Some of His spirit here means not in the incarnational sense, but the pure, innate spiritual nature that God has endowed her or him with.
The Quran indicates again that one of the most honored positions of human, is that God created the human, and as I referred to Surah 17 earlier, it means both sexes, as His trustee and representative on earth. There are many references in the Quran that reaffirm this.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
a reply to: undo
"Never judge a philosophy by its abuse."
~ Saint Augustine
You don't actually know what Marxism is. The government doesn't need to have a place in the process at all. 3 men start a business, 3 men get equal share of the profits. They hire bring a 4th person in, and instead of giving him a wage, they give him an equal cut of the profits. Everyone gets an equal cut of the profits for the work they do. That is Marxism in a nutshell.
I have no idea what it is that you are talking about in your disaster fantasy.
Back on topic -
I read yesterday where a couple had their legs broken - and then were burned alive - by our lovely neighbors the Muslims.
Yet, we spend millions researching just what 'their' opinions are - while our Veterans sleep on the streets for lack of government spending!
I bet the Muslim radicals get a real big chuckle out of that one! Because you can bet your boots they're not going to spend millions to find out what we think.
Wake the hell up people.
peace
originally posted by: undo
originally posted by: AgentShillington
a reply to: undo
"Never judge a philosophy by its abuse."
~ Saint Augustine
You don't actually know what Marxism is. The government doesn't need to have a place in the process at all. 3 men start a business, 3 men get equal share of the profits. They hire bring a 4th person in, and instead of giving him a wage, they give him an equal cut of the profits. Everyone gets an equal cut of the profits for the work they do. That is Marxism in a nutshell.
I have no idea what it is that you are talking about in your disaster fantasy.
i do know how marxism is applied, and that's the problem. it looks good on paper but it destroys entire countries, their moral standards, their financial security, pits neighbor against neighbor, drives up the propaganda machine to a fever pitch, and literally steals, at gun point, the energy of the people on the planet, both current and past (since they also believe it is their right to march into your home and take anything they want, including family heirlooms, photo albums, mementos and anything you've ever worked for).
marxism in its application, has been responsible for the deaths of billions and billions of people, under the most excruiating circumstances, such as starving the entire ukraine to death, men, women, children, infants, old people.
no thanks.
originally posted by: undo
a reply to: AgentShillington
marxism is the old pharaonic system, reapplied. so yeah, billions and billions. stalin killed 45 million of his own people, with who knows how many people outside of russia. see, in order to replace the various other types of government, with communism, they first have to undermine the country morally and financially, create an atmosphere of toxic jealousy, drive it with propaganda till the people go into survival mode, brainwash entire generations and then drive them out into society to remove anyone who disagrees with them. all of this under the promise of sharing the wealth, which insteads resolves down to everyone but the ruling class, being dirt poor, waiting in line for hours for a single roll of toilet paper.
shared misery is not an excuse for that misery.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
a reply to: AgentShillington
You used the proper word there (allowed)
Muslim women have no choice.
American women have a choice.
That's why I'm critical of muslims.
This choice by American women has consequences. One being they don't spend as much time with their children. That has drawbacks. In the long run.
Did that help in your confusion?
No, it didn't, because you are livng under this delusion that Muslim women all over the world don't have choices. It's true, many don't, but it isn't a problem with Islam, or it would be -every- Muslim woman.
Can we at least agree that it is the GOVERNMENTS that allow the persecution in the name of Islam and not the actual religion?
Muslim women have no choice.
American women have a choice.
That's why I'm critical of muslims.
This choice by American women has consequences. One being they don't spend as much time with their children. That has drawbacks. In the long run.
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
a reply to: AgentShillington
You used the proper word there (allowed)
Muslim women have no choice.
American women have a choice.
That's why I'm critical of muslims.
This choice by American women has consequences. One being they don't spend as much time with their children. That has drawbacks. In the long run.
Did that help in your confusion?
No, it didn't, because you are livng under this delusion that Muslim women all over the world don't have choices. It's true, many don't, but it isn't a problem with Islam, or it would be -every- Muslim woman.
Can we at least agree that it is the GOVERNMENTS that allow the persecution in the name of Islam and not the actual religion?
Delusion is a rather strong word don't ya think?
When governments are ran with sharia law, I would have to blame the religion and not the government.
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
originally posted by: AgentShillington
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
a reply to: AgentShillington
You used the proper word there (allowed)
Muslim women have no choice.
American women have a choice.
That's why I'm critical of muslims.
This choice by American women has consequences. One being they don't spend as much time with their children. That has drawbacks. In the long run.
Did that help in your confusion?
No, it didn't, because you are livng under this delusion that Muslim women all over the world don't have choices. It's true, many don't, but it isn't a problem with Islam, or it would be -every- Muslim woman.
Can we at least agree that it is the GOVERNMENTS that allow the persecution in the name of Islam and not the actual religion?
Delusion is a rather strong word don't ya think?
When governments are ran with sharia law, I would have to blame the religion and not the government.
And if we set up a form of government that ran under the rules of Dungeon's & Dragons, would that be the fault of Wizards of the Coast? Or would that be the fault of the people that ran the government?
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
The same nutters that run the governments run the religions.
You can listen to those nutters if you want to but I will choose not to.
They can run their little countries however they want to but don't expect me to listen to them.