It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: elevenaugust
I think I was very clear in the related thread in my post here. Your photo may be genuine, but I'm afraid this is not an original, especially because it missed some EXIF data, like for example the camera model name.
Please, don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying in any way your photo is faked, I'm saying that any serious analysis should be done only on original unmodified photo, that you haven't provided yet unfortunately.
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
I don't think so..troll much?a reply to: raymundoko
originally posted by: wmd_2008
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
I don't think so..troll much?a reply to: raymundoko
Says the man that every object is a ufo first even when it's obvious it's not, like the fireworks drone video.
originally posted by: VoidHawk
a reply to: elevenaugust
Hi elevenaugust
RE your post in that other thread.
originally posted by: elevenaugust
I think I was very clear in the related thread in my post here. Your photo may be genuine, but I'm afraid this is not an original, especially because it missed some EXIF data, like for example the camera model name.
Please, don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying in any way your photo is faked, I'm saying that any serious analysis should be done only on original unmodified photo, that you haven't provided yet unfortunately.
Exif data.
Its already being argued within this thread that I have altered it!
With the exception of my deletion of the camera model; can you show whether I have altered the exif data?
I would appreciate it if you could answer that question.
I ask it because you have an identical copy of the original photo (exif stripped out), and you also have the exif data (minus camera model), therefore you have the full original photo with just the camera model missing.
With only the camera model missing you have the full set of data, so why is the camera model so important?
The photo I am offering is within this thread, and I feel the original should not be needed to determine whether the photo I have posted has been altered. If I am wrong then please state what you can get from the original that you cannot get from the posted photo. You have the image data and you have the exif. That ought to be enough to determine whether the photo I have posted has been messed with.
I greatly appreciate your offer of non disclosure, and I'd love to supply you with the original, but my golden rule on the internet is never to post personal data, even if its just a phone/camera model.
originally posted by: VoidHawk
Heres the original...
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: VoidHawk
I've never said it was fake, I said I think you know exactly what you got a picture of.
This is absolutely impossible for any original authentic photo to only have this metadata set.
originally posted by: Paperjacket
Chinese lamps maybe
originally posted by: VoidHawk
I don't believe its alien, and I don't think its military because I don't get why they would fly this thing so visibly, so I'm more inclined to think its some elites own personal high tech transport!?
originally posted by: VoidHawk
a reply to: elevenaugust
You just wrote
This is absolutely impossible for any original authentic photo to only have this metadata set.
I find it strange you should make such a statement!
Any reader coming through this thread will know that you are already aware that I saved the photo via photoshop for the sole purpose of removing the exif data.