It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An SAS hero who smuggled cannabis into the UK for his suffering ex-army colleagues after claiming the Government had failed to care for them has been spared jail by a sympathetic judge.
Paul Boucher, 52, who was mentioned in dispatches for his 'inspirational leadership and bravery' in Northern Ireland where he saved lives, said the Government had "let down" his fellow soldiers who were suffering from a range of conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder.
A court heard he was forced to leave the army because of disabilities from his distinguished 22-year service with the Army.
They included a spinal injury from parachute jumping, deafness in both ears, osteoarthritis in his left knee and depression.
Boucher moved to the warmer climate of Spain and was caught trying to drive through Dover with 1.7kgs of cannabis worth £7,000 hidden in his car.
originally posted by: Bybyots
a reply to: Soloprotocol
Because the "authorities" placed a monetary value on the weed...
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: Soloprotocol
And how do you know this is for profit?
originally posted by: Bybyots
the "authorities" placed a monetary value on the weed
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
And if you believe his story you need to have your head examined.
Boucher moved to the warmer climate of Spain and was caught trying to drive through Dover with 1.7kgs of cannabis worth £7,000 hidden in his car.
He was smuggling for profit not for his ex comrades.
originally posted by: Rodinus
Hmmm...?
If I understand correctly, empathy and understanding others are not your strongest points... Maybe I am wrong?
Mind if I ask if you have been personally involved or injured or even witnessed the horrors of special forces missions Solo?
It is so easy to judge from ones comfortable armchair when one has not "been there"
Kindest respects
Rodinus
a reply to: Soloprotocol