It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lonegurkha
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: MrLimpet
Testing negative doesn't mean Ebola free. Ebola might have a 42 day incubation. Quarantine the dog longer.
Prove it. Not seeing any proof for your statement. I call Baloney till you offer proof.
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: MrLimpet
Testing negative doesn't mean Ebola free. Ebola might have a 42 day incubation. Quarantine the dog longer.
originally posted by: lakesidepark
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: MrLimpet
Nina and Bentley can now run free. I would give anything to see how that dog responds when Nina comes and frees him.
Me too!
That will be a sight to see
originally posted by: Khaleesi
originally posted by: lonegurkha
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: MrLimpet
Testing negative doesn't mean Ebola free. Ebola might have a 42 day incubation. Quarantine the dog longer.
Prove it. Not seeing any proof for your statement. I call Baloney till you offer proof.
www.dailykos.com...
uk.news.yahoo.com...
thecount.com...
freedomoutpost.com...
All of these articles cite the same source. That source is WHO. No bologna or do you want a higher authority than WHO?
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: Khaleesi
Shhhh. Don't ruin their fun. A submissive cute young nurse and her expensive cute dog make people happy. A middle aged mouthy nurse whining about her rights is a terrible person.
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: lakesidepark
My position is that someone who isn't infected with Ebola should not be quarantined against their will.
Just pointing out that the dog might have Ebola. Doesn't that demand quarantine until we can be 100% sure?