It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: skalla
Can we expect another new thread on this next week? The last one is still warm.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Started FOUR days ago.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
can we have EVIDENCE not anecdote ?????????????????
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: 6Taco6Smell6
but you cannot identify this aledged plant - or the chemical process of this aledged " stone softening "
lastly - stone that hand been " softened " shaped and rehardened would be very obvious - hint crystal structure and orientation
is there any evidence - or just more annecdotes ?
originally posted by: 6Taco6Smell6
It looks pretty obvious that the structures have been shaped in such a manner. There are a few threads and one recent one showing it off.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: 6Taco6Smell6
If these people possessed such an amazing technology, why wouldn't they put the stones in molds and make uniformly sized bricks? Take a look at this wall from Machu Picchu:
I chose this picture because toward the bottom, the wall is fashioned similarly to those in the more popular images that have people talking about melting stone but as you look higher up the wall, you can observe a gradual transition as less and less time was spent finishing the stones until at the very top it looks like any other dry stacked stone.
originally posted by: skalla
Can we expect another new thread on this next week? The last one is still warm.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Started FOUR days ago.
originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: mcx1942
The only difficulty is that we have no difficulty finding old thing; we have also noted that civilizations leave massive archaeological footprints , 10's of millions of artifacts, yet we are to believe that a lost civilization left nothing but quarries, rubble and finished items behind - but no stone tools, burials, writing, pottery, habitations or other signs.
It doesn't add uup
originally posted by: Jarocal
originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: mcx1942
The only difficulty is that we have no difficulty finding old thing; we have also noted that civilizations leave massive archaeological footprints , 10's of millions of artifacts, yet we are to believe that a lost civilization left nothing but quarries, rubble and finished items behind - but no stone tools, burials, writing, pottery, habitations or other signs.
It doesn't add uup
perhaps they were more fastidious with their ecological foot print and most of what they used for tech quickly decomposed...
I''ve stayed in other threads that I do not find it inconceivable they used a substance to make hammering on the stone easier, but to state they completely dissolved and reformed it in molds to ne is anythin far stretch of the evidence we see.
In 1987 Vincent R. Lee, an architect, proposed the Inca fit their stone blocks using a known method of scribing and coping. He demonstrated this method in a 1995 NOVA program titled "Inca." In this program, he suspends a stone block above the spot it will be scribed to, using wood blocking (logs, shims, etc.). The block will already be squared up roughly along the edge, the face will be finished. Now he begins to use the scribe, which can be made out of any material. A wooden triangle, always held at the same angle (or held plumb with the aid of a plumb bob). So long as the scribe is held at the same angle and remains the same spacing, it can trace the outline of one stone onto the face of the other. The backside is not scribed, it just needs to be shaped roughly to provide some backcut. After scribing and chipping the stone with finer and finer cuts, a simple abrading block 'sands' the block to the scribe line. Then the block is lowered into position to test it for fit. The process is repeated until the fit is perfect. In the video, a couple modern masons recreated the effect and only spent about 4 hours getting a large block to fit with a high degree of precision. One can expect the ancient Inca who were talented in scribing and coping masonry were highly prized.
originally posted by: Hanslune
Howdy Blackmarketeer
I've seen that and this image demonstrates the idea also
originally posted by: Xeven
You would not need to have it re-harden to use it to fit two rocks tightly together. You just need it to "melt" enough of the two rocks edge where they meet to have them fuse tightly together.