Israel Blocks Access to Contested Holy Site in Jerusalem. Palestinian spokesman calls it “War"

originally posted by: guitarplayer
a reply to: Not Authorized

They were attacked they defended themselves and drove the enemy back and took Jerusalem. The US did the same thing with Porta Rico, the Philippines and Wake Island and many more. If there are no consequences to aggression then there will be aggression. They should never of given any of the land they fought and won in the three day war.

Even since WW2 the annexing of land by force is against international law. Every bit of land Israel has stolen since 48 is illegal.

a reply to: guitarplayer

"I do believe that the temple wall was there long before the dome so the Jews have more of a right to the land"

We have discovered, and continue to discover Phoenician, Philistine, and Canaanite ancient settlements, temples, structures, and artifacts in the "State of Israel" that predate the establishment of the ancient "Kingdom of Israel."

The modern day Palestinians are a blended mixture of the indigenous Levantines, Arabs, and also, remnants of the original Israelites of the kingdoms of Judah and the North.

Based on your logic, this would then give the Palestinians an even greater claim to the land than the Israeli Jews. However, I believe that all land is for all humans to share peacefully and respectfully.

a reply to: guitarplayer

I'm sorry. You think you Israel owns Jerusalem? What does the U.N. say?

Timeline rejected.

Using sins of the past as a red herring also didn't impress me. Why look backwards, when one can look forward?

Expect more infidel bloodshed if they continue to try and destroy & desecrate Al Aqsa Mosque.


This (Al Aqsa Ban) is just another Israeli attempt to incite violence, so they can Annex more of Jerusalem and attack more innocent Palestinians by means of collective punishement...
Both against International Law!


Israel's illegal activity is coming to a head, people have seen the light...
& Palestinians, both Christian & Muslim alike, have been telling us this for 60 f#ing years...



Zionism is failing fast.
They've undone themselves with their own Hatred, Hasbara, Heresy & Hegemony!!!

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: guitarplayer
a reply to: Not Authorized

They were attacked they defended themselves and drove the enemy back and took Jerusalem. The US did the same thing with Porta Rico, the Philippines and Wake Island and many more. If there are no consequences to aggression then there will be aggression. They should never of given any of the land they fought and won in the three day war.

Even since WW2 the annexing of land by force is against international law. Every bit of land Israel has stolen since 48 is illegal.

Israel never got all the land they were given under the Balford accord prior to ww2. So whos the trespasser here? Tell that to the USSR and how many countries did they annex in to the soviet union after ww2. Why didn’t the international union of countries under international law not stop Russia if it was illegal?

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: guitarplayer

I'm sorry. You think you Israel owns Jerusalem? What does the U.N. say?

Timeline rejected.

Using sins of the past as a red herring also didn't impress me. Why look backwards, when one can look forward? I know. But but Rome did it too!

If they want Jerusalem back let them fight for it like Israel did. Oh that's right they can only sneak attack and then run for the hills like Egypt and Jordan did.

originally posted by: Sahabi
a reply to: guitarplayer



We have discovered, and continue to discover Phoenician, Philistine, and Canaanite ancient settlements, temples, structures, and artifacts in the "State of Israel" that predate the establishment of the ancient "Kingdom of Israel."

The modern day Palestinians are a blended mixture of the indigenous Levantines, Arabs, and also, remnants of the original Israelites of the kingdoms of Judah and the North.

Based on your logic, this would then give the Palestinians an even greater claim to the land than the Israeli Jews. However, I believe that all land is for all humans to share peacefully and respectfully.

Sounds good what's your address so I can post it as someone who wants to share with everyone since you stated that land belongs to everyone.

a reply to: guitarplayer

It's a shame people blame the Palestinians for Jordan's & Egypt's invasion of Israel proper...


At the end of the day Palestine was a pawn of the six-day War and just used as an entrance to Israel...

They weren't a part of the Arab League of Nations!

originally posted by: guitarplayer

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: guitarplayer
a reply to: Not Authorized

They were attacked they defended themselves and drove the enemy back and took Jerusalem. The US did the same thing with Porta Rico, the Philippines and Wake Island and many more. If there are no consequences to aggression then there will be aggression. They should never of given any of the land they fought and won in the three day war.

Even since WW2 the annexing of land by force is against international law. Every bit of land Israel has stolen since 48 is illegal.

Israel never got all the land they were given under the Balford accord prior to ww2. So whos the trespasser here? Tell that to the USSR and how many countries did they annex in to the soviet union after ww2. Why didn’t the international union of countries under international law not stop Russia if it was illegal?

Israel violated the Balfour accord that is why they didn't get what they wanted. Besides you are overlooking the obvious question. What right did anyone have giving away land that didn't belong to them?

a reply to: guitarplayer

"Israel never got all the land they were given under the Balford accord prior to ww2. So whos the trespasser here?"

Although they had no sovereign, autonomous, or centralized government,... nor a unified societal identity,... the people that we now call "Palestinians" were living on the land prior to and during the signing of the Balfour Declaration (1926). The original Balfour Declaration (1917) was addressed to Walter Rothschild, (hint, hint).

Additionally, the ancestors and predecessors of the Palestinian People were native to the Levant even before Joshua led the Israelis into the "Promised Land."


Why must we feel the need to choose sides? To cheer and support one side over another,... all the while we are actually ignoring the lives, freedom, happiness, safety, and peace of HUMANS,... not Palestinians, Israelies, Muslims, Christians, or Jews,... human beings on all sides are suffering, this is not a sport for entertainment.

originally posted by: guitarplayer

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: guitarplayer

I'm sorry. You think you Israel owns Jerusalem? What does the U.N. say?

Timeline rejected.

Using sins of the past as a red herring also didn't impress me. Why look backwards, when one can look forward? I know. But but Rome did it too!

If they want Jerusalem back let them fight for it like Israel did. Oh that's right they can only sneak attack and then run for the hills like Egypt and Jordan did.

I do hope you are not talking about the war in 67 because Israel started that war when they bombed the Egyptian airfields. And the war that came after that America bailed Israel out of that one.

a reply to: Sahabi

this is not a sport for entertainment.

It is to the Zionists & psychopaths like Mr.Netanyahu.


I agree with you though Sahabi my friend.
You've been the most intellectual so far in the thread!

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: guitarplayer

It's a shame people blame the Palestinians for Jordan's & Egypt's invasion of Israel proper...


At the end of the day Palestine was a pawn of the six-day War and just used as an entrance to Israel...

They weren't a part of the Arab League of Nations!

They were under the control of Jordan (west bank) and Egypt (gaza strip) and did not fight against Jordan or Egypt in that war so by their inaction to fight against the invasion made them complicate in it.

a reply to: guitarplayer

What did they have at their disposal to fight against it if they were under control?


Use some common sense with that one.

They were pawns then and now they have rockets & freedom fighters to go against the zeitgeist they're "terrorists".


It's bulls#.


Palestine will be free of all heathens!

a reply to: guitarplayer

Like Israel did? Ahhhh. We have a war monger. Law only applies with the Balfour Declaration. Got it.

You are not winning over the heart and mind of the Observer.

I loved listening to lectures by Shlomo Sand by the way. I just started observing, err reading one of his books. Would you like me to link it for you?

Ps, timeline rejected.

Double post. Now why did that happen. Lol.

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

No Palestine will be wiped out before the battle of Armageddon. Being under the control of Egypt and Jordon does not mean they were without weapons. I do beleive that the PLO was active at that time and they had plenty of weapons.

a reply to: guitarplayer

Didn't you hear? The Apocalypse has been cancelled.

Seems that book that describes it? Yeah...about that. It is fictional. Someone figured that out a while back.

Timeline rejected.

originally posted by: Not Authorized
a reply to: guitarplayer

Didn't you hear? The Apocalypse has been cancelled.

Seems that book that describes it? Yeah...about that. It is fictional. Someone figured that out a while back.

Timeline rejected.

Hide and watch.

a reply to: guitarplayer

Watch what? Genocidal maniacs trying to eradicate the people of Palestine using religion as cover? Isn't that playbook a little worn out? Where have I heard that in a book before.... hmm. I wonder.

[SNIP]

Timeline rejected.

Besides, I'd rather spend my time reading this book here instead.