It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: funbox
hmm very good Mr shift , you made the adjustments well , seems like the little critters got an inner eyelid , but eye reflections don't squeeze
Are you a alien doctor, and know what kind of material that eye is made of ?
They could be implant eyes.. like we have implants that improve our lives.. perhaps there are more artificial stuff inside those then organic.. perhaps it looks like a doll because it is in a sense a living doll .. a very advanced doll..
Perhaps that's not even eyelids, perhaps its a "rubber" like screen to protect against bright light or infections.
There is no freaking why those pictures can be debunked like that..
Why make a fool of yourself making a claim he's not what he said he was when it's clear from the evidence he was exactly who he said he was? How many patents do you have to your name?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: Bilk22
Maybe a HS graduate, but I never figured out how how someone could get to be a "senior scientist" without knowing Lenz law. Not only that but his uncontrolled experiment dropping objects and having some random guys watch the fall instead of doing it scientifically seem to indicate he's not a scientist and doesn't think like one, so either he's a liar, or his employer promoted someone grossly incompetent for the position of senior scientist to that position.
To people that question why he'd do a hoax on his deathbed, I have a question for you. Why does anybody do hoaxes?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: Bilk22
Maybe a HS graduate, but I never figured out how how someone could get to be a "senior scientist" without knowing Lenz law. Not only that but his uncontrolled experiment dropping objects and having some random guys watch the fall instead of doing it scientifically seem to indicate he's not a scientist and doesn't think like one, so either he's a liar, or his employer promoted someone grossly incompetent for the position of senior scientist to that position.
To people that question why he'd do a hoax on his deathbed, I have a question for you. Why does anybody do hoaxes?
originally posted by: Bilk22
Why make a fool of yourself making a claim he's not what he said he was when it's clear from the evidence he was exactly who he said he was? How many patents do you have to your name?
originally posted by: mbkennel
But no, we get an enabling interviewer.
If he were a real scientist who knew something he wouldn't choose some ignorant puffoon like the interviewer.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
The whole physics sidebar was starting to sound like some drunken arguments I've had with my buddies about such things as "who is more powerful - Samantha or Jeannie?" and "who is hotter - Samantha or Jeannie?".
What a dumb conversation. Of course Jeannie was hotter.
originally posted by: Pauligirl
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Blue Shift
ears lack holes too. no orifices can be seen
I think that happens when you're made of plastic.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: Pauligirl
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Blue Shift
ears lack holes too. no orifices can be seen
I think that happens when you're made of plastic.
I can only imagine how odd the autopsy would have been.
Sigh. Rookie. For me it would depend on the kind of mood or theme I was going for at the moment. They were both pretty stupendous. And while we're talking moods, why not both? And what about Betty vs Veronica?
OT: Was it ForteanOrg who was going to do another photo comparison? Maybe focus on the eyes? Maybe I missed some stuff, I'll go back.
No what's foolish is a person making statements as fact that are directly contradicted by fact that has been posted throughout this thread.
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: Bilk22
Why make a fool of yourself making a claim he's not what he said he was when it's clear from the evidence he was exactly who he said he was? How many patents do you have to your name?
How many would it take to prove he is a senior scientist? One? Five? Ten?
How many do you have? How many clearances have you held? How many defense contractors have you worked for?
I'm thinking triple goose eggs.
And the over the top faux outrage is what's really foolish.
originally posted by: Roxxo
a reply to: DenyObfuscation
They're from a video posted earlier in the thread.
40 seconds in the eyes are open wide. 44 seconds in the eyes appear to have narrowed.
I'll have to watch the Boyd Bushman video again to see if his pictures show the apparent blinking.