It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Qspeedyrock
reply to: LDragonFire
They do make these claims and a few more but one must consider that remote viewers are not gods. The claimed accuracy rate is about 36% using present day and historical events however when future events come into play the accuracy rate drops significantly and Ed Dames states this in his books Predicting events to the exact date is absolutely imposible and remote viewers can only go on a serious of possible events. The events that Ed Dames is predicting may be on another time line which means that if one of the events does not happen neither will the others.
originally posted by: Qspeedyrock
reply to: LDragonFire
They do make these claims and a few more but one must consider that remote viewers are not gods. The claimed accuracy rate is about 36% using present day and historical events however when future events come into play the accuracy rate drops significantly and Ed Dames states this in his books Predicting events to the exact date is absolutely imposible and remote viewers can only go on a serious of possible events. The events that Ed Dames is predicting may be on another time line which means that if one of the events does not happen neither will the others.
originally posted by: roadgravel
Didn't this guy have us dead years ago?
I call this type of forecasting, the Blunderbuss Approach.
Given the prediction failure rate, we should feel pretty safe now, from everything except other humans.
originally posted by: Nemo418
Since the Virgin space plane blew up, does that mean that Mr. Dames got his prediction correct? ;-)
originally posted by: LDragonFire
originally posted by: Nemo418
Since the Virgin space plane blew up, does that mean that Mr. Dames got his prediction correct? ;-)
I don't recall him saying anything about it.
He did say that there was another large sun spot opposite of AR2192, he is wrong there but as far as I know AR2192 is still growing and could be massive by the time it comes back around in 10 days or so.