It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Dfairlite
Exactly. The drug store owner can choose which types of contraceptives (products) to offer. The wedding is the product.
If the wedding is the product, they are legally obligated to sell it to everyone. Period.
Sure, you can decide what type of contraceptives to sell (let's say condoms), but if you sell condoms to straight people and not to gay people (because they're now "gay condoms"), you're discriminating and breaking the law.
This "chapel" sells weddings. Selling them to straight people and not to gay people is discrimination.
originally posted by: tadaman
No. They can choose what to sell to whom.
This isnt even just a US law.
Ferrari sells Ferraris. ONLY product they offer really. TRY to buy one. Even if you can afford one, they will outright deny sale if you dont meet their criteria.
You dont have the right to dictate to a business what they do or dont sell.
Being that this business sells only religous ceremonies, you cant tell them to give you one.
The reverse of this that would have you all going ape isht would be for a Jewish man to walk into a gay owned liquor store and demanding to buy Kosher wine if they dont have it. And then suing because they were not accommodated.
OR when you get crazy Baptists in your communities hunting for a gay a business and they take these laws and draw up endless insulting and horrendous tactics to target gay businesses, and they walk into your businesses with a smile and hatred...deal with it.
originally posted by: tadaman
The reverse of this that would have you all going ape isht would be for a Jewish man to walk into a gay owned liquor store and demanding to buy Kosher wine if they dont have it. And then suing because they were not accommodated.
OR
A Neo Nazi walking into a Gay bar with his friends and demanding you put on skin head music, because he filled the bar to capacity and now wants most of the patrons to be served and have the music they came there for to be played.
IF this continues, and that stuff happens, which it will, I will tell you to deal with it.
So when bored KKK members use this fanciful interpretation of the law to harass gay businesses you better smile and take their money and run out to fetch them what they want.
OR when you get crazy Baptists in your communities hunting for a gay a business and they take these laws and draw up endless insulting and horrendous tactics to target gay businesses, and they walk into your businesses with a smile and hatred...deal with it.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
There are (at least) two rebuttals to this, the first being an agreement, but stipulating that there will be no accommodation for a gay couple (meaning they will be called husband and wife, cake will have man and woman on top of it, etc.).
The second is, the minister is performing a religious ceremony, he is free to choose who he performs said ceremony on due to religious freedom.
The minister is a separate entity from the hitching post llc, he is an employee or contractor. If The hitching post doesn't offer services that come free of the minister, then they are unable to provide their service to gays as they cannot force their employee to violate their beliefs. In this case, if the hitching post wants to serve the gay community they can find a minister willing to serve them, however, they are under no obligation to do so.
In the past their web page openly admitted they would "marry you using a traditional or civil ceremony" and would also "perform wedding ceremonies of other faiths as well as civil weddings." Now the ADF claims the business will "only perform ceremonies consistent with their religious beliefs.
At no point did the doctrines the Knapps believe restrict their business activity prior to same-sex marriage becoming legal. These admissions were scrubbed from their page after they filed their lawsuit.
originally posted by: beezzer
These same people that say a business cannot discriminate are the same ones that cheer a business who discriminates against people who open-carry.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: beezzer
These same people that say a business cannot discriminate are the same ones that cheer a business who discriminates against people who open-carry.
Red Herring. It's a logical fallacy, but it works for collecting stars.
People who carry guns are welcome in businesses. Their guns are not. A gun doesn't have legal rights to be in a business.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
No. They can choose what to sell to whom. This isnt even just a US law.
Ferrari sells Ferraris. ONLY product they offer really. TRY to buy one. Even if you can afford one, they will outright deny sale if you dont meet their criteria. You have to have owned one beforehand, OR have a couple letters of recommendations from Ferrari owners guaranteeing that you arent a reckless person who will lower the prestige of their product by having it rotting in a junk yard somewhere after you crash it or damage it.
You dont have the right to dictate to a business what they do or dont sell. Being that this business sells only religous ceremonies, you cant tell them to give you one. You dont get to bend the rules. You cant walk into a church and demand Eucharist for the same reasons you cant force a chapel to give you a religious ceremony.....
I couldnt buy condoms when I first started having sex. I looked to young and they outright said no.
The reverse of this that would have you all going ape isht would be for a Jewish man to walk into a gay owned liquor store and demanding to buy Kosher wine if they dont have it. And then suing because they were not accommodated.
OR
A Neo Nazi walking into a Gay bar with his friends and demanding you put on skin head music, because he filled the bar to capacity and now wants most of the patrons to be served and have the music they came there for to be played.
IF this continues, and that stuff happens, which it will, I will tell you to deal with it.
So when bored KKK members use this fanciful interpretation of the law to harass gay businesses you better smile and take their money and run out to fetch them what they want.
OR when you get crazy Baptists in your communities hunting for a gay a business and they take these laws and draw up endless insulting and horrendous tactics to target gay businesses, and they walk into your businesses with a smile and hatred...deal with it.
originally posted by: macman
So, with that, since the Gun has nothing to do with a person. Customers can leave their "Gay" outside as well.
I've penned much on how freedom is a double-edged sword.
And written extensively that when you inhibit/restrict some freedoms, you end up denying freedoms that many enjoy.
When we start using the law to beat each other over the head and use said law to deny behaviour that might not be acceptable to some, then you are opening yourself up to future laws that might turn around and bite you in the metaphysical rear.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
When the service is offered as advertised (for a price) to the PUBLIC and they refuse the service to a certain group of people, then it's considered discrimination.
The service they offer is a ceremony that joins a man and a woman who become husband and wife. They do not offer ceremonies that join 2 men to become husband and husband, or two women who become wife and wife.
It is not discrimination because they do not offer a ceremony that joins 2 people of the same sex. If they refused to marry a couple because one of them is gay or one of them is black, then that would be discrimination.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: beezzer
Morning Beezzerbub! Hope we're all in a cheerier mood this fine day :-)
I've penned much on how freedom is a double-edged sword.
And written extensively that when you inhibit/restrict some freedoms, you end up denying freedoms that many enjoy.
When we start using the law to beat each other over the head and use said law to deny behaviour that might not be acceptable to some, then you are opening yourself up to future laws that might turn around and bite you in the metaphysical rear.
Just exactly where would I find my metaphysical rear? Then, once located - how do I know for sure that the new laws designed to promote discrimination will protect my heavenly ass?
I think, beezzer, that for you freedom means never having to say you're sorry...Freedom from consequence - is that what you really want? For all of us? Religious belief should allow each and every one of us to do what we believe in our hearts to be right?
Well, whatever. Maybe all these Christian freedom fighters manning the front lines of this battle for their civil rights need to do is call themselves a private club. If they're looking for a work-around - that would do it
Much (much, much...) more paperwork - but then they could pretty much do whatever they wanted. They could exclude whoever they choose to exclude
Way to go civilization! Mankind takes one giant step forward - then steps back two thousand years