It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
It was a smart thing to do. And the children that the STUPID nurse exposed to ebola should be taught at home for their watch period.
This story goes to show how much damage just one ignorant and selfish person with Ebola can do. She knew she had a fever and yet she flew anyways. Her alleged phone call to the CDC doesn't get her off the hook on this one. Fever = contagious. Everyone knows that .. and especially a nurse would.
One dumb person with ebola ... look at the mess made.
Imagine dozens of them doing the same thing.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
One dumb person with ebola ... look at the mess made.
Imagine dozens of them doing the same thing.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
But hours after the director, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, made that statement, one official said that Ms. Vinson had indeed called the C.D.C. before boarding the plane, but was allowed to fly because she barely had a fever.
originally posted by: blargo
Looks like the nurse did the right thing and called CDC before boarding that flight and CDC said it was OK:
SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: The virus can survive in liquid or dried material for a number of days (23).
originally posted by: MagesticEsoteric
a reply to: blargo
In my opinion, she still should not have flown and the CDC should have never given her permission.
She is a medical professional that should have known that even a slight fever means she could be contagious with something. Maybe not even ebola but, something at the very least. On top of that, she had direct contact with Duncan so she shouldn't have taken the risk.
Why take the risk of infecting others with whatever she has...especially considering the air ventilation on airplanes.
It was stupid and selfish on her part and just plain stupid on the CDC's part.
Just my opinion.
originally posted by: tavi45
This new phenomenon and the long running and clearly impossibly frequent bomb threats shutting down schools added together with the ever increasing police brutality things seem grim. When the economy finally collapses again, so too will society. The United States will become a fascist totalitarian police state. We will make Hitler and his Nazis look like children. If humanity survives (and America doesn't win) then America will be the bogeyman for millennia. Even without all my apocalyptic doom porn it's getting very very hard to be proud to be an American.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Bigburgh
You need direct contact with the fluids, not just the host.
The fluids shed from the host through sweat and saliva in addition to blood, vomit, etc.
The fluids stay viable on surfaces for hours to days.
All it takes is contact with one teeny tiny invisible virion to infect someone.
The schools did the right thing.
SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: The virus can survive in liquid or dried material for a number of days (23).
www.msdsonline.com...
originally posted by: itswhatev
STUPID NURSE????
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: FlyersFan
If she gained permission then that is above her.
It would be like duncan asking if he could use the bathroom in the waiting room in the er after he was known to have ebola.