It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. 4 For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. 5 Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’ sake. 6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God’s ministers attending continually to this very thing. 7 Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: buster2010
Should a pastor or preacher be allowed to use the church for protection while they are preaching hate? How is this any different from the people that are placed under arrest at rallies when they give speeches promoting hate. Remember several preachers from Texas have been calling for gays to be killed just because they are a pastor in no way means they should be given a free pass.
#1 A pastor should not be preaching hate
#2 American fought hard for the right to free speech, liberals and progressives fought the hardest for free speech (porn especially) in the past 20 years.
#3 There is also a constitutional amendment that is often misquoted by liberals/progressives/Democrats as separation of church and state. Regardless of the correct wording the government is forbidden by law to direct the content of sermons. Intimidation by requiring the submission of sermons is directing content.
#4 This would be the first step in doing away with non-interference in the practice of religion. Do you want to take the first step in doing away with the "separation of church and state" as is often misquoted from the constitution?
I think the pastors have a very clear cut and strong case for suing the city big time and winning hands down a massive lawsuit on this one.
Unless, the government wants to do away with non-interference between church and state altogether. Then what happens when the government changes as governments do and the majority want the church to interfere in the state?
originally posted by: badgerprints
originally posted by: buster2010
church is forbidden from using the pulpit for political purposes.
By what law?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Not what I'm saying at all. File a law suit, but be prepared for what happens. That's true when anyone files a lawsuit against anyone, right? Is what the city did illegal? If so, have charges filed. If not, you just have to deal with it.
The point is, no one is hauling these ministers to jail for their sermons. The first amendment has not been breached here. It's a law suit. Nasty things happen during a law suit. Both sides can get nasty. Fact of life.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: kaylaluv
do you actually believe that the pastors would stand up in their congregations and tell them all to lie about their identity and sign the petition more than once??
think the bible clearly states that there's a place in the lake of fire for those that lie.
I would hope that half of their congregations would walk out of the church and never come back if they did such a thing!
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: badgerprints
originally posted by: buster2010
church is forbidden from using the pulpit for political purposes.
By what law?
Tax laws that is why I said give up their tax free status you must have missed that part.
Tax Laws
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: beezzer
If we wait until they go to jail for what they preach, then it'll be too late to complain about.
Well, let me know when that happens, and I'll admit you were right. (eye roll emoticon)
Remember this is FOX News. When they hear the word gay they start babbling gibberish and foaming at the mouth.
Facts? psshhh
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: beezzer
because unless they have reason to believe that something like that happened there is no reason to want the sermons and such!
They are not looking for evidence that is pertaining to this case they are hoping to gain evidence for a future case against the pastors- one that could possibly take away their tax exempt status.
Isn't there something about not having to say anything that is self incriminating?
I can't wait for the city to also demand Mosques also hand over all sermons and literature. Oh wait, they won't. Only those racist dumb Christians.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: beezzer
If we wait until they go to jail for what they preach, then it'll be too late to complain about.
Well, let me know when that happens, and I'll admit you were right. (eye roll emoticon)
But in the meantime, lets push the envelope against the 1st Amendment?
Is that really what you are endorsing?