It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amuk
What would help is for all of you to contact your congressmen and let them know that you will remember who voted to take away our rights next elections.
Believe it or not if enough of you do it can make a difference
Originally posted by dgtempe
Non believers? Ok, we'll just sit back and wait until Fox news has the special report, then we can all believe.
I cant believe some of you think this isnt coming.
Originally posted by Thorfinn Skullsplitter]
Oh please. If you still think that our congressmen give a damn, or are even capable of making a difference or have the desire if it goes against their interests, you're kidding yourself...
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
With them stating is on verge of passing the House, maybe at least this time, the House will READ IT before they pass it.
Originally posted by Amuk
If you consider apathy fixed then yes they are. I wonder how many people bitching about Bush didnt bother to vote?
From the article:
December 7, 2004
If you were a member of Congress, would you vote "yes" on a 3,000 page bill that you never had a chance to read? Most reasonable people wouldn't. Most reasonable people would want to read and study legislation before deciding how to vote; especially legislation as monumental as the intelligence reorganization legislation or the so-called 9/11 bill.
And monumental it is. The legislation would greatly affect various intelligence and military agencies and procedures; financial systems; international relations; not to mention civil liberties. In addition, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the legislation will cost $14.4 billion to implement between 2005 and 2009. That's $14.4 billion on top of the normal annual budgets for the various governmental agencies involved.
Yet this monumental legislation will be voted on by members of Congress without those members having had time to read, let alone study, the bill. It's just after 2:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, December 7th. The U.S. House is expected to vote on the 9/11 bill sometime today or tomorrow. But at this moment, there isn't a copy of the final bill available for House members to read.
So, is there a provision in the bill to establish a national ID? No one seems to know. Or at least the people who do know aren't saying. What else is in the bill that the select few in Washington are keeping secret? Who knows? Anything could be...and that's the point.
According to Deist, the bill would not only introduce the national ID card, but make it mandatory to have a job as well as setting up internal checkpoints in the USA.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
THINK about what you just posted. It was LEAKED.
fox article
The Justice Department can now ask a federal court that operates in secret to allow surveillance of a so-called lone-wolf terrorist � a suspect with no connection to a terrorist organization like Al Qaeda or to any nation. An example of someone who would qualify is Timothy McVeigh
The bill also allows the government to deport immediately any alien who knowingly received financial support for terrorists.
The bill also gives federal judges the authority to deny bail to any terrorism suspect
Washington Post
the new intelligence director will have greater authority than the CIA chief does over the budgets of the 15 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community
The bill also will create a Privacy and Civil Liberties Board, designed to safeguard individuals' rights. It establishes minimum standards for birth certificates and driver's licenses, and tightens the security of Social Security cards.
House Majority leader in same article
"the recommendations made by the 9/11 commission have been properly deliberated, and the result is a stronger bill that will allow us to better fight the war on terror."
those mainly seeking crackdowns on illegal immigration fared less well, winning only House leaders' assurance that immigration issues will be taken up early next year
who voted against it in the House?
In a 90-minute closed meeting of House Republicans yesterday morning, the chief advocate of putting more immigration restrictions in the bill -- Judiciary Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (Wis.) -- implored colleagues to hold out for a better deal.[...] Sensenbrenner could prevent only 67 Republicans from voting aye. Democrats overwhelmingly supported the measure, with only eight voting no.
Originally posted by mockan
By the way, for anyone who still thinks this is a joke. If you
have ever participated in any of the forums on ATS that
discuss anything even remotely political, then you have
already been listed, somewhere. Same for any newsgroup on
the Internet.
If you have ever said anything against the Bush
administration, said you believe in the Constitution, or
believe in the principles of the Declaration of
Independence... kiss your future goodbye.
Welcome to the New World Order.
Just speaking for myself, I won't be posting anything
political on the Internet again, ever, as of now. Also I won't
be posting again in ATS again. Too many subjects here that
have too much truth in them, and all of them unless
acknowledged by the "Ministry of Truth" are probably
dangerous to talk about.
Good Bye.