It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: maddy21
ok whatever, you must be one of the rich snobs in your country. when people in a country kill young girls for hiding in a field to pee, i really take notice when they try and ridicule me.
please go back and wallow in your squalor and be proud of it. when you decide that hygiene and sanitation should come before your war making capabilities. maybe we can talk.
i'm one one's that say we shouldn't give aid to other countries until we take care of ours and they take care of theirs with the money we give them. whether it's for science,space, or military and it benefits your people, not just the few.
tell me just how does going to space clean the turds out of the street, dead bodies out of the river or benefit the poor who are hungry living in their and your filth in your country.
pardon me if thinking that those things should be more important than making a nuke or sending unmanned probes to the moon. clearly my thinking is skewed.
originally posted by: maddy21
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: rickymouse
They use a lot of Turmeric in India. I don't think there will be so many deaths from Ebola there. I could be wrong, I am just assuming some of the properties of the foods they consume could protect them from this virus.
Somehow I don't see turmeric protecting from Ebola.
The death toll in India will be massive when it hits there, which it will eventually.
From what I am seeing in these pictures, the death toll will be much higher in India than in Africa due to their cultural daily hygiene practices. At least in Africa they don't float corpses in the rivers and then bathe and drink and brush their teeth in corpse ridden water.
Again , stop taking these pictures as something which happens through out the country . If the same logic is applied Americans love shooting kids and Englishmen simply love raping children.
Ebola should have already hit India considering the investment and the number of Indians who work there are 100 times the number of westerners .
originally posted by: grandmakdw
My parents have been to India and I've known others who have been to India. They all report the extreme poverty and overcrowding. Just those two factors alone will spread Ebola like wildfire if it gets to India.
The toilet habits are fairly universal in India as of at least a very few years ago. There was even a TV show about India, middle class India, that joked about the removal of feces after defecation. That practice alone will spread Ebola like wildfire.
originally posted by: maddy21
As for Ebola , if India has been able to avoid Ebola and America has failed to contain Ebola it crystal clear that India is far more competent in dealing with Ebola than Americans are , considering the amount of Indians who travel too and from from the country is at least a dozen times more than America . You folks should be more worried about the incompetency of your Health service rather than be worried about something which is non existent . When things fail spectacularly at home people often like to laugh at others for some self satisfaction this thread is a great example such a mentality . I for one am least concerned about the comments as those are made by people who are brainwashed which means their opinions are worth less than the dirt under my slippers ..
Nearly 48 per cent of Indians have no access to toilets and are forced to defecate in the open. In rural areas, this proportion goes up to 60 per cent. Folded into this lack of access is an intersection of caste, class and gender prejudices, a social system ordered on who is let in, who must stay out, who can clean the toilets and who cannot. According to a report compiled by the National Confederation of Dalit Organisations, only 23.7 per cent of Dalit households have access to latrines, as opposed to 42.3 per cent of non-Dalit households. And in most contexts, access to toilets is heavily skewed against women — a 2009 survey found that in Delhi, there were 1,534 public toilets for men but only 132 for women. Too often, this has been a tragic shortfall. The Badaun case, where two girls were killed when they went into the fields to relieve themselves, showed that for women, access to a toilet can be a matter of life and security. In urban areas, too, thousands of women queuing up for slum toilets early in the morning or late in the evening face harassment and humiliation.
Unsanitary truths
edit on 15-10-2014 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)
Local police officers had suggested that they had suspected the victims were murdered in an honour killing by their own families. The case had been assigned to the CBI a month later at the request of Akhilesh Yadav, the Chief Minister of the state. The CBI had been of the opinion that the post-mortem report that had been submitted was unreliable, and had in July been granted permission from the court to exhume the bodies of the teenagers in order to allow an expert team to carry out autopsies. However, heavy rains had led to the graves of both girls being submerged by the River Ganga, and the efforts at exhuming had been abandoned.
No Evidence to Suggest Badaun Victims had been Raped: CBI
The different definitions and different underlying small sample surveys used to determine poverty in India, have resulted in widely different estimates of poverty from 1950s to 2010s. In 2013, the Indian government stated 21.9% of its population is below its official poverty limit.[4] The World Bank, in 2010 based on 2005's PPPs International Comparison Program,[5] estimated 32.7% of Indian population, or about 400 million people, lived below $1.25 per day on purchasing power parity basis.[6][7] According to United Nations Development Programme, an estimated 29.8% of Indians lived below poverty line in 2009-2010.[8]
Poverty in India is a historical reality. From late 19th century through early 20th century, under British colonial rule, poverty in India intensified, peaking in 1920s.[9][10] Famines and diseases killed millions each time.[11][12] After India gained its independence in 1947, mass deaths from famines were prevented, but poverty increased, peaking post-independence in 1960s. A variety of welfare and food security initiatives, along with rapid economic growth since 1991, has led to sharp reductions in extreme poverty in India.[13][14] However, those above poverty line live a fragile economic life.[15] Lack of basic essentials of life such as safe drinking water, sanitation, housing, health infrastructure as well as malnutrition impact the lives of hundreds of millions.
MGI's Access Deprivation Score measures the availability of essential services such as clinics and schools, electricity and sanitation. Our research finds Indian households, on average, lack access to 46% of the basic services they need, and the extent of their deprivation varies across districts.
From 2004-05 to 2011-12, public spending on basic services rose faster than GDP, but its impact on poverty reduction was limited by leakage, wastage or ineffectiveness. By contrast, almost three-quarters of the reduction in India's Empowerment Gap during this period came from jobs and productivity growth. Without major reforms, our research suggests, 36% of the population could remain below the Empowerment Line in 2022 and 12% would remain trapped in extreme poverty.
India: From Poverty to Empowerment
India Poverty Statistics As per the survey conducted in 2011-2012, the percentage of persons below the Poverty Line in India for the year 2011-12 has been estimated as 25.7% in rural areas, 13.7% in urban areas and 21.9% for the country as a whole. The respective ratios for the rural and urban areas were 41.8% and 25.7% and 37.2% for the country as a whole in 2004-05. It was 50.1% in rural areas, 31.8% in urban areas and 45.3% for the country as a whole in 1993-94. In 2011-12, India had 270 million persons below the Tendulkar Poverty Line as compared to 407 million in 2004-05, that is a reduction of 137 million persons over the seven year period.
Poverty in India 2014 Facts, Report and Statistics PDF
originally posted by: SomePeople
Rubbish - what it means is that even an starving, sick africans would rather not travel to india.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
Gibberish
originally posted by: LukeDAP
Damn, those pictures. There are many poor places here in Brazil too (never been to one that was too bad, though), but I don't know if it's THAT terrible.
Either way, if/once Ebola hits these areas in the world, we'll have "Ebola in Africa 2.0: India" (and wherever else it happens).
Although, to be honest, I don't even know if Ebola is the worst that could happen to these people (obviously not saying it'd be good). The two VERY sick men in those pictures look like they already are going through something extremely bad and serious.
Anyway, my point was that, Ebola or no Ebola, they need help.