It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 2gd2btru
SomePeople, your questions opened up an opportunity to ask my adult child about jobs in their corporation. I was given a real life situation they are going through right now. They need to fill 100 jobs that pay around $32,000 annually, which is their company's lowest tier, and does not require a college education. After weeding through applicants they chose 800 to further test for aptitude and abilities. Only 53 past the test. All the employees are offered further education through tuition vouchers. Only 2% took them up on that benefit. There are still 47 jobs paying a living wage and offering free education that are still open.
Looking at the above I'm inclined to believe many of the living wage jobs are beyond the abilities of the minimum wage earners. If they do not make themselves marketable should Corporate America just throw money at them? How does one encourage them toward growth?
originally posted by: carewemust
People who settle for Minimum Wage jobs should move to places in the country that have the lowest cost of living. That should be priority #1 for those who lack the gumption to make themselves more marketable. With the internet, landing a job in a low cost-of-living state/town should be a snap. With few assets, moving to your chosen region (within the USA) is very easy to do.
-cwm
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: tothetenthpower
I agree.
So paying mcdonalds workers 15$ an hour benefits everyone and not just the McDonald's employee.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: MrWendal
That's exactly the point.
If the minimum wage worker makes more that makes your labor more valuable in the market. It's macro economics.
originally posted by: Hefficide
In essence - the argument you make reeks of a caste system to me. Those who sit in offices matter more than the soldiers in the field.
originally posted by: Hefficide
The problem is that a three tier system has become a two tiered one in the past three decades. The vast middle drying up and leaving, in it's wake, a very polarized financial gulf between the successful and the surviving.
Let's not forget that healthcare costs would skyrocket due to the increase of wages...That would be untold billions of dollars for those on Medicare and Medicaid...
originally posted by: onequestion
Hi I'm postulating here and making an assertion so please feel free to educate me.
Companies who pay low wages devalue the entire job market.
If low wage jobs had the bar raised such as mcdonalds it would force the entire labor market to adjust to their income level. The reason this would happen is because in order for companies to compete and find better emoyees they would need to raise the bar or risk not attracting better employees.
Anyway I think that I got the general premise out.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: beezzer
Storm the Bastille is the inevitable.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: onequestion
The reason is simple. A chart can show just about anybody why GREED is the primary reason wages are low.
The cost of living has increased, inflation has occurred a hundred times over, but wages have stagnated.
Why is this?
Greed!
~Tenth