It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“This individual was following full CDC precautions,” he said, noting that the gear would have included a mask, gown, and gloves."
originally posted by: bludragin
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
You're kidding me, right? A "gown" in no way qualifies as a hazmat suit, nor does it provide any kind of substantial protection. However, the inclusion of gown is duly noted. Too late to edit my post.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: bludragin
Well taking into consideration that during the treatment and quarantine of the 2 first infected Americans in Atlanta and then a 3 one, no personnel or health care worker that were around them became infected, so definitely something went very wrong with the nurse in Dallas.
Perhaps malfunction or defective safety suit?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
It's not airborne. A gown absolutely will protect you, and is the standard for contact precautions. If she became infected she did not follow protocol. Period.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: guohua
Very, Very Unfortunate for this nurse, I'm sorry for her and her family.
The problem being is the next announcement out of Obama will be something like this and people will believe him.
Ebola is the JV team of viruses.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Daughter2
It would still need an entry point, broken skin, eyes, nose, mouth. When the worker does things right, it works.
As I said earlier, it's easy to screw up, and Ebola is not C. Diff, it should be given better precautions because human error does exist.