It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: jude11
i don't often quote the bible, but when i do i quote:
Ezekiel 23:11-21New International Version (NIV)
11 “Her sister Oholibah saw this, yet in her lust and prostitution she was more depraved than her sister. 12 She too lusted after the Assyrians—governors and commanders, warriors in full dress, mounted horsemen, all handsome young men. 13 I saw that she too defiled herself; both of them went the same way.
14 “But she carried her prostitution still further. She saw men portrayed on a wall, figures of Chaldeans[a] portrayed in red, 15 with belts around their waists and flowing turbans on their heads; all of them looked like Babylonian chariot officers, natives of Chaldea. 16 As soon as she saw them, she lusted after them and sent messengers to them in Chaldea.17 Then the Babylonians came to her, to the bed of love, and in their lust they defiled her. After she had been defiled by them, she turned away from them in disgust. 18 When she carried on her prostitution openly and exposed her naked body, I turned away from her in disgust, just as I had turned away from her sister. 19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt.20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. 21 So you longed for the lewdness of your youth, when in Egypt your bosom was caressed and your young breasts fondled.[c]
or maybe this one:
Jeremiah 10:1-10King James Version (KJV)
10 Hear ye the word which the Lord speaketh unto you, O house of Israel:
2 Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.
3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.
4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.
5 They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.
6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O Lord; thou art great, and thy name is great in might.
7 Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee.
8 But they are altogether brutish and foolish: the stock is a doctrine of vanities.
9 Silver spread into plates is brought from Tarshish, and gold from Uphaz, the work of the workman, and of the hands of the founder: blue and purple is their clothing: they are all the work of cunning men.
10 But the Lord is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
originally posted by: jude11
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: NoRegretsEver
If they are to be used as the word of god, shouldnt god be proven real first?
THen shouldnt all the conspiracy theories be in the grey area since they are yet to be proven? Hence it would be conspiracy FACT ...?
ooohhh...
SLAM!!!!
I agree but my point is not to use ATS as a pulpit but rather a discussion platform.
Peace
I find that there are just as many people that use ATS to proselytize their "new age" theories as I do the traditional religions.
What's the difference between a bible thumper and someone that babels-on about conciseness? Not much.
They believe with absolutely no proof.
I may disagree with them, but I welcome their input.
Thats actually a valid point, I suppose anything could be considered someones religion depending what kind of belief they put behind it, and time
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: signalfire
Religious people have a lot of 'splainin to do, and a lot of horrors to answer for. In short, you think you're being fine upstanding citizens, whilst you advocate for a deeply flawed and dangerous thought process that frequently descends into violent madness.
My MY thats a large brush youre painting with there sir, where did you buy such a megalithic painting instrument!
When people speakin such broad terms about those who might be religious, it really makes them no more tolerant then those they advocate against....
As SHEEPSLAYER but it so eloquently earlier in the thread, Many things can be viewed as a religion, and many people use those ideas to brow beat others.....
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: jude11
If your goal is to seek converts ( which it is) this is not the way to go about it.
Do you have an example of this sort of thing going on here?
Source please?
I tried to keep this open for Discussion rather than hating but I guess I failed?
Peace
I find that there are just as many people that use ATS to proselytize their "new age" theories as I do the traditional religions.
What's the difference between a bible thumper and someone that babels-on about conciseness? Not much.
They believe with absolutely no proof.
I may disagree with them, but I welcome their input.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
originally posted by: jude11
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: NoRegretsEver
If they are to be used as the word of god, shouldnt god be proven real first?
THen shouldnt all the conspiracy theories be in the grey area since they are yet to be proven? Hence it would be conspiracy FACT ...?
ooohhh...
SLAM!!!!
I agree but my point is not to use ATS as a pulpit but rather a discussion platform.
Peace
I find that there are just as many people that use ATS to proselytize their "new age" theories as I do the traditional religions.
What's the difference between a bible thumper and someone that babels-on about conciseness? Not much.
They believe with absolutely no proof.
I may disagree with them, but I welcome their input.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: Klassified
You make a good point that I cannot refute. Touche Klass.
All I can say is that I believe there is very little difference in the actual mindset/psychological health of either group.
Why should we allow one group of nutbags and not the other?
All I can say is that I believe there is very little difference in the actual mindset/psychological health of either group.
Why should we allow one group of nutbags and not the other?