NIH: "We May Have to Vaccinate Whole Countries to Stop Ebola Outbreak"

Ok, my first Ebola thread...and for me it just reeks of corruption, greed, lies, mass manipulation, fear mongering...pick one.

NIH: "We May Have to Vaccinate Whole Countries to Stop Ebola Outbreak"

www.modernhealthcare.com...
Two days ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases , told The Canadian Press that it’s “quite conceivable, if not likely” that fast-tracked Ebola vaccines may have to given to entire countries to get the viral outbreak under control (via Modern Healthcare ):

It is conceivable that this epidemic will not turn around even if we pour resources into it. It may just keep going and going and it might require a vaccine.

As the epidemic gets more and more formidable and in some cases out of control it is quite conceivable, if not likely, that we may need to deploy the vaccine to the entire country to be able to shut the epidemic down. That is clearly a possibility.

The article did not specify which country in particular Dr. Fauci — whose institute just so happens to be currently working on an experimental Ebola vaccine (the first to begin human clinical trials) with Big Pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline — was referring to. Was he talking specifically about Sierra Leone? Liberia? Guinea? Any place where Ebola has taken hold? The entire continent of Africa? Other countries, should it break out there including Spain or America?
Read more at www.activistpost.com...

Whole Countries? Force the vaccine program? hmmmm

So can we assume that an entire Nation with forced vaccinations is enough to satisfy the pockets of the CDC? Big Pharma? 2 Nations? 3? Which Country will it be and why am I getting a close-to-home feeling?

So I always ask who benefits because in this World, someone always does.

The CDC? Nah...???

Dave Hodges , over at The Common Sense Show, has already penned an article demonstrating how the CDC has positioned themselves to profit financially should Ebola spread throughout the U.S.

The CDC has ulterior motives in the diagnosing and subsequent treatment of Ebola. First of all, the CDC is traded on Dunn and Bradstreet. This fact makes the CDC a for profit corporation. Secondly, and as I have pointed out before, the CDC owns the patent on Ebola and all variances up to 70% of the variance. This means that because the CDC owns Ebola, they will receive a royalty every time a treatment is provided because of the alteration of their intellectual property rights.

These two facts mean that if the CDC moved to block the spread of Ebola, they would cut into their profit motive. On this point, there can be no argument. Are we supposed the humanitarian nature that the CDC would forgo their profit motive in order to serve the public good? Should we trust the CDC? What are the implications?

What else does the CDC say?

"Banning air travel from infected Countries will spread Ebola even faster" WTF?

The um...logic:

“Even if we tried to close the border, it wouldn’t work,” the top health official added. “People have a right to return. People transiting through could come in. And it would backfire, because by isolating these countries, it’ll make it harder to help them, it will spread more there and we’d be more likely to be exposed here.” - See more at: www.thedailysheeple.com... hash.IqrRWhDm.dpuf

How to create a bigger market for their experiment? Change the goal posts on how we get Ebola of course.

Watch the change at 5:44:


"Because we’re not in contact. Just talking to someone is not a way to get infected. It’s not like the flu, not like the common cold. It requires direct physical contact."

Then:

"Gupta: So, to Michaela’s point, the reason we talk about coughing and sneezing not being a concern — if you were to have coughed on me — you’re saying that would not be of concern?

Frieden: We would look at that situation very closely…"

Nice backslide.

Yes, it's about the money: At the 1:20 mark



Will you be in line after the Swine Flu Experiment? How about the fact that we are getting to the point of forced Flu shots?

Could you be next? Could you be fired for refusing a flu shot?

"Yes, you could," says holistic family physician Dr. David Brownstein, editor of Dr. David Brownstein's Natural Way to Health. "If the government says that healthcare workers can be forced to take this vaccine, there is nothing to stop them from forcing all Americans to take this shot under the guise of a public health emergency
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com www.NewsmaxHealth.com... Alert: What Is Your Risk for a Heart Attack? Find Out Now

Get that? FORCING ALL AMERICANS.

It sure seems that lately the Govt. really wants to stick needles in us and push the plunger Doesn't it? I know one thing for sure...I won't be standing in line.

Unless of course I can get a coupon for 20% off at CVS...If I take a chance.

www.iheartcvs.com...


Peace

Remember the NWO isn't real and forced vaccinations are for your benefit. Clearly this is the end game. And we're all gonna watch it happen and do nothing.

As Bill Gates walks thru the door:

This short reply doesn't do your thread justice, but: no one is going to stick a needle in me, especially if i'm not given a choice.

originally posted by: tavi45
Remember the NWO isn't real and forced vaccinations are for your benefit. Clearly this is the end game. And we're all gonna watch it happen and do nothing.

Nope.

Gonna turn the other way and run.

Peace

originally posted by: kicked
This short reply doesn't do your thread justice, but: no one is going to stick a needle in me, especially if i'm not given a choice.

Short but to the point my friend.

'nuff said.

Peace

a reply to: jude11

Might I ask you to reconsider your sources?

Nothing is traded on Dun and Bradstreet. It's not a stock exchange, it supplies credit and corporate data.

CDC is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, but there, the initials stand for Copper Development Corporation.

At least one of your sources is pulling your leg.

originally posted by: jude11

Whole Countries? Force the vaccine program? hmmmm

So can we assume that an entire Nation with forced vaccinations is enough to satisfy the pockets of the CDC? Big Pharma? 2 Nations? 3? Which Country will it be and why am I getting a close-to-home feeling?

I disagree that there will be any forced anything. That is the control exercised over the serfs of the past; overt physical domination, and that usually, eventually, leads to rebellion.

The fear will be drummed up and the hype will be blown out of proportion, and youll have ~90%+ of the serfs lining up to get themselves the shot, without having to force a single one.

The remaining ~10% will not be profitable to pursue, and will just be ignored, by both the 90% lemmings, and the PTB.

They had this stuff in their back pockets for a long time...the vaccines and serums.

Just not enough test subjects or consumers, so that had to be remedied, eh?

And let's not forget that it was news in Early August, right after they flew in the first two infected patients to Emory, that the NIH was starting (restarting?) their vaccine trials in September.

Makes perfect sense to me.

And along with this, I am strongly leaning toward there being carriers, and not of the typical or scaremongering "terrorist" variety, maybe even the patients who were brought in and "cured," merrily traveling across the countries donating blood (that was a win for and "calming" fear to create the consumer base too.

I wouldn't put anything past them. People kill for far, far less. Greed kills.

ETA: I don't believe Thomas Duncan was the real patient zero in the U.S. either. It was more likely someone they brought in who was/is a carried, either cured or immune. But that's just me.

Um yeah, NO. Don't really care to be their live-bug beta tester.

a reply to: jude11

The miracle vaccine will contain the microscopic cells to further the instillment of Agenda21.

The cells will attach to the brain and DNA.

And the inoculation genes will pass to future generations.

a reply to: xuenchen
Maybe nanites.

Yep yep.

originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: jude11

Might I ask you to reconsider your sources?

Nothing is traded on Dun and Bradstreet. It's not a stock exchange, it supplies credit and corporate data.

CDC is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, but there, the initials stand for Copper Development Corporation.

At least one of your sources is pulling your leg.

hmmm

Says here that it is traded.

anticorruptionsociety.com...

But then again, it's the net.

Please provide more if you have.

Thanks,

Peace

Hmm. Money spent on helping people, or money spent on war? I'm thinking the latter, because we got to keep that war machine going.

Looks like its almost time to start giving the Survival forum some serious attention.

I can just imagine the cocktails theyre brewing up for us in the labs...Sterilization, cancer, heavy metals anyone?

a reply to: tinkortwim
No no no.

Big Pharma just wants it share of the pie. Big War can't have it all.

Ha!

I touched on this very issue a week ago!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I don't know whether to be glad or very frightened.

My job is requiring me to get the flu shot or wear a mask every day from November 30th to April 30th. I will be honest, I am not looking forward to wearing that mask...Hello Ebola Kitty

originally posted by: Tucket
Looks like its almost time to start giving the Survival forum some serious attention.

I can just imagine the cocktails theyre brewing up for us in the labs...Sterilization, cancer, heavy metals anyone?

It seems like the perfect storm.

Even tho I believe it, I have a hard time believing it. Too big to fathom. Too nightmarish.

Peace

originally posted by: eisegesis
My job is requiring me to get the flu shot or wear a mask every day from November 30th to April 30th. I will be honest, I am not looking forward to wearing that mask...

Wear it and be proud.

Peace