It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: JamesTB
please explain WHY the inca could not have done that ?
PS - dig a trench - lay a fire - lay the stones in - build the fire up - ignite - voila
EDIT TO ADD :
the profusion of inca era pottery shows that they were capable of kiln building
originally posted by: JamesTB
In this video we see that the Serpents of Chinchero have a vitrified surface.
The Inca couldn't possible do this so who did?
YouTube Link -
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: skalla
originally posted by: JamesTB
In this video we see that the Serpents of Chinchero have a vitrified surface.
The Inca couldn't possible do this so who did?
YouTube Link -
www.youtube.com...
Like already asked, why could the Inca not do it?
The Stones look polished and then cooked to me, there is only a very thin outer layer of probable vitrification by the looks of it, and the stone is just very shiny and smooth rather than turned glassy and translucent.
Human first cooked rocks (to allow the making of better tools from poorer, grainier rock) a couple of hundred thousand years ago, CBA to look it up but it's an ooold process. Putting masonry into a fire to get a similar change in texture etc is a simple enough thing, and easily experimented with for desired effect.
So.
Why could the Incas not build a fire around polished masonry blocks and let it burn for a day so the rocks look extra shiny?
originally posted by: JamesTB
In this video we see that the Serpents of Chinchero have a vitrified surface.
The Inca couldn't possible do this so who did?
YouTube Link -
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: JamesTB
In this video we see that the Serpents of Chinchero have a vitrified surface.
The Inca couldn't possible do this so who did?