It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: woogleuk
a reply to: ignorant_ape
If that was aimed at me, I would like to point out that there is 1,424 square miles of thick wooded area, with caves, mountains, hills and water to hide amongst, with plenty of food and natural resources to choose from.
55 million people in a country the size of the UK isn't an awful lot really, and besides, should shtf, what's the likelihood of that many people descending upon the lakes, it's a long way from London to Cumbria.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: woogleuk
55 million people in a country the size of the UK isn't an awful lot really, and besides, should shtf, what's the likelihood of that many people descending upon the lakes, it's a long way from London to Cumbria.
where exactly do you think all the people that survive in the urban city areas will go once the infrastructure breaks down and the trucks full of food stop flowing in ?
do you really think they will stay put,or do you think they will venture out in search of greaner pastures where the remaining food is ?
You do realise that only something like 2% of the UK's land is actually urbanised right?
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: woogleuk
55 million people in a country the size of the UK isn't an awful lot really, and besides, should shtf, what's the likelihood of that many people descending upon the lakes, it's a long way from London to Cumbria.
where exactly do you think all the people that survive in the urban city areas will go once the infrastructure breaks down and the trucks full of food stop flowing in ?
do you really think they will stay put,or do you think they will venture out in search of greaner pastures where the remaining food is ?
I think that in an extreme situation most of them will be dead due to a complete lack of food and cater, violence and disease.
I don't imagine the average man in england would be able to survive outdoors at all. With no supplies or tools they would stand no chance.
originally posted by: woogleuk
I live in the lake district (Cumbria), enough said.
I can walk 8 miles to the nearest lake...wildlife, fruits, fish in the lakes, high fells and mountains, plenty of fresh water.
I've spent a week doing a survival course out here, it's easily done.
originally posted by: Quantum_Squirrel
i am of the opinion that in this situation Bugging In is the new Bugging out, get ready to hunker down, fortify and hopefully wait until its all over and enough time has elapsed for it to be safe to venture out again.
I know rampaging hoards etc etc better than the alternative tonnes of diseased masses fighting each other as no one has anything, the shops locked and empty and they were too busy watching X-factor to get some long term plans in place.
Q
originally posted by: boymonkey74
If shtf how long before 80% of the populace die out? 6 months? a year? I dunno but I would have enough food and water for at least a year.
Yes I would be hard to find and yes I will survive....only after a long time would I look for other survivors.