This is Mars 2014

@ 7:25 in the video. What in god's name? That is horrifying. That really, REALLY does not scream "natural" to me.

Amazing video. Even though some of the anomaly photos shown in the last half of the video look like they could be natural geology, a lot of them do not look natural in the least.

a reply to: skyblueworld



The OP had a cool video. Some of those pictures are amazing to look at. I often think about Star Wars. Luke's Home looks a lot like Mars, and they have moisture farms built down into the "earth." I sometimes wonder about stuff like that. Whats amazing about the pictures to me is how Earth like Mars looks like now without too much water on it. It seems like back in the day with much more liquid water it would have been very similar to Earth. With meteorites being broken off from mars and hitting Earth, it's no real question to me bacteria are most probably on both planets.

What I don't really see is pure evidence of anything human or intelligently designed by physical beings. The weird part to me is how the perception of mars being so red including the sky, has kept up all this time. There is an Aversion to realizing our planet isn't so special for some reason. To me that's exciting. Maybe it's scary to other people, but to me it's the best news I could ever hear.




*Man you have find the buried scud missiles in the sand dunes and get those MIAs who might help in later missions where you need to blow up dump trucks carrying weapons secretly... And then maybe you can shake Bill Clinton's hand. My Favorite game on SNES. MISSION FAILED return to the Frigate.

a reply to: nighthawk1954
@7:45 and the "blurr" @9:56

Fascinating visual display nighthawk1954

1 enjoyed it much

NAMASTE*******

The rock that looks like a weapon of some sort, looks to me like a rock protruding from the dune in the background and a separate rock in the foreground, in the trough of the dune.

If there were any metal structures on Mars, I doubt any metal structure would be discernible after millions of years of being blasted by wind borne dust. Any exposed metal would have disintegrated long ago.

Not trying to derail the thread, just stating my opinion.

Loved it Nighthawk! Yes, a lot I have seen before, but most I haven't. Very compelling stuff. Didn't I see that strange old hermit Ben Kenobi in one of those shots?

Seriously? @ 7:25 min

Someone point me to that thread please!

.

Oh my god. The picture at 7:30 made the hair on my entire body stand up. Is that seriously an anomaly on mars? Somebody please tell me its fake because it looks like some sort of ogre with half his face melted off. You can even see what looks to be teeth!

a reply to: ForestBehindTheTrees

Yes, horribly horribly cartoony teeth to boot... sheesh, of coarse that pics a load of bunk, and if its part of that video (havent watched it and wont) and being purported as a real anomaly then all hope for the sanity of man kind is lost. (then again we are dealing with mars anomaly pics people here)

As for the 'cannon', looks like a rock with a bunch of other rocks (or to me a single rocks edge mostly burried) buried in the sand a good distance behind it in such a way it looks like a cannon... which it isnt, especially given how small those rocks more than likely are. Take a few hundred pictures of a rocky sandy part of earth, and then go 'anomaly' hunting... i bet you find all sorts of interesting 'things', doesnt mean they are anything but misidentified nonsense or optical illusions.

Mars anomalies, yes there are some but 99% of em are wishful thinking or down right stupidity being passed of as reality.

These kinds of threads ar dumnb to me. All I see are rocks and pixels and graphical effects applied to things to make them stand out.

A few things below have always been on my mind that don't feel satisfactorily answered to me. I am NOT a scientist or a Phage. But these're the things which I still wonder about:

1) Is the sky really red? Is there a NASA agenda to make the images red or blurry, starting with the Viking images?

2) Arthur C. Clarke said the giant plant-like patterns were maybe 97% likely signatures of life. He apparently had been communicating with somebody who relayed this to him. Of course, NASA doesn't agree, and these "plants" are I think near the polar icecap(s). IF they're at the icecap(s) (I'm not completely sure on this), how could they possibly survive in that environment, if they're alive? And they're also about a kilometer or larger in diameter.

3) How much liquid water is on Mars? What I've read says it's very very rare and only comes out in briny spurts, typically near craters and ridges, and quickly "boils" to nothing. Is NASA purposely downplaying it?

4) Is there an agenda, as has been suggested by Chandra Wickramasinghem, in space exploration to deny life on nearby planets in order to: reduce costs of space missions on other planets which are tied to protecting against potential biological contamination or harm, keep the purpose of searching for life elsewhere artificially high, Are there other reasons?

5) Is there anything at all to the claims intelligent life might be covered up because it might destroy or harm Earth's cultures or institutions, as alluded to in the Brookings Report in 1960?

I inherenlty mistrust any powerful organization such as NASA. Power corrupts, or tends to. It's too easy to abuse it. On the other hand, any kind of effort to explore space is going to involve power structures. Power structures, like governments or corporate hierchy or even famlies, are probably inescapable. If we can't trust power structures, what can we trust? So I guess to some extent my distrust of power structures is misguided, and possibly mentally deranged?

a reply to: Charizard

Yes, that face with the teeth, I haven't seen it before. Since the youtube producer is one of those who doesn't give credit to discoveries, I'll have to call hoax on this particular object until a link can be provided by someone.

a reply to: Aleister

That thing at 7:25 in the top video looks like Sigmund the Sea-monster from that old Sid and Marty Kroft show on Saturday morns back in the golden days ... and it looks like the teeth, at least, are pasted onto the image... and why do people see something tapering up, in the second video, and decide it's a gun?

Dumb, da dumb dumb... but some of the other stuff you guys have found is really interesting and in the mass I bet lies a fossil or three... I'd bet a dollar on it, anyway.

Frankly, most of what this video presents looks like ordinary rocks. I have seen some more convincing photographs here on ATS.

originally posted by: skyblueworld
Link to NASA pic

The link above is to the RAW image.

Looks to me like a sand narwhal, those things are everywhere on mars.

a reply to: nighthawk1954
Great post OP.

CURIOSITY is making me very CURIOUS!

rebel 5

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: nighthawk1954
Nice find Nighthawk. Definitely food for thought. It leaves one thinking there was either a very ancient civilization on Mars, or we aren't looking at images of Mars at all. Of course, we could just be crazy, and none of what's in the video is anything but rocks.

Wow, You've really given me food for thought!

Rebel 5

I believe that there was an ancient race on Mars, and that an ancient nuclear war kicked off and destroyed the planet. If we on Earth are not careful, then we could well be looking at Earth's own future. Pretty grim don't you think?

Found this.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: skyblueworld

The "weapon" looks very small to me.
You see the grains in the sand dunes..
..so this thing can't be much bigger than a shoe-box!

@ 9:24 - News just in, Mars used to be Lordran. Praise the sun!
Executioner Smough