It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: nonspecific
You could head towards the mountains in the North of Scotland, but you would need to go prepared and know what you were doing because people die in the area, that being said there is no one else for miles around in some places.
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Yup head north .. I recently spent 4 days out in the cairngorm national park in scotland. Every night we slept in a different location. That's where I'm gonna head if things go sideways
originally posted by: ShayneJUK
For what its worth i have a plan for me and mine if things go south.
i know the location of several shelter points transport etc
and i will be acquiring a yacht and heading off shore
to a little place i know
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Yup head north .. I recently spent 4 days out in the cairngorm national park in scotland. Every night we slept in a different location. That's where I'm gonna head if things go sideways
How quickly could you mobilise though, I can head off for months and have done but not at very short notice, thats the key to it surley?
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Yup head north .. I recently spent 4 days out in the cairngorm national park in scotland. Every night we slept in a different location. That's where I'm gonna head if things go sideways
How quickly could you mobilise though, I can head off for months and have done but not at very short notice, thats the key to it surley?
I have to admit my mobilisation is the problem especially living near London. But Northern Scotland is definitely a place to head for.
originally posted by: signalfire
a reply to: nonspecific
Bugging out anywhere is not a possibility. The people who are already 'bugged out' are the only ones in a situation where they may survive something extremely major; that is the people who are already living out in the country, basically off grid, with water and food supplies already in place. Any city or suburban dweller leaving the safety of their homes, however dark they may be, will die in days of exposure, crime and lack of clean water. The highly armed may last a little longer, but you have to sleep sometime, at which point you're a goner. All the people who have a location picked out, maybe with some supplies hidden, are kidding themselves. The likelihood you'll leave the city in time, before the gridlock, and arrive at your location unscathed, is minuscule. How far could you walk, with your supplies, if your car runs out of gas or is stolen or stuck in traffic jams?
You can't bug out an entire population of a city the size of London, or Chicago or whatever. Cities themselves, in many ways, are barely sustainable now, much less if trucking ends, along with all the people working daily to supply them.
There was a book written quite a while ago that's easily available on a search, 'We Almost Lost Detroit' which discusses the early days of the atomic energy business. When asked about 'what if' scenarios', the Atomic Energy Commission assured the public that 'no leaks would ever take place'; that was basically unthinkable because so many fail-safes were designed into the systems... when asked further, well, what if something happens, the answer was 'evacuation, maybe for a few hours or days...' When asked what if something major BIG happens, the answer was the same, 'evacuation'... the thought that you simply cannot evacuate a city the size of Detroit, or Chicago, or London, or Paris, if there's an extreme event of whatever kind, simply didn't compute. They were unable to follow through mentally on the idea that their 'solution' was impossible, and from that, back off from the decisions to go ahead with nuclear power.
Fast forward 50 years, we got Fukushima, and Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island and a lot of other 'mistakes' you've never heard about.
originally posted by: crayzeed
I honestly believe that no one can bug out in the UK. Firstly you do not have to bug out too early as if there is any semblance of authority they will seek you out and stop you or if the sh** really hit the proverbial they will punish you. As you say the UK is just to crowded to bug out. You may think there are vast areas empty but if there is a big enough crisis to make you bug out the rest of the country will be trying to do it. That means roaming bands after supplies. I saw a video only yesterday about just this subject (ok it was in the US but still the same problems) and with experts giving their opinions followed a family after a country wide collapse. It was an eye opener with the experts really saying for you and your family to survive you must be prepared to kill for water and food. Sooner you live and they die. I think the only way you can survive a major crisis is to get into a compact community that looks after one another not try to go it alone.
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Yup head north .. I recently spent 4 days out in the cairngorm national park in scotland. Every night we slept in a different location. That's where I'm gonna head if things go sideways
How quickly could you mobilise though, I can head off for months and have done but not at very short notice, thats the key to it surley?
I have to admit my mobilisation is the problem especially living near London. But Northern Scotland is definitely a place to head for.
So would it make a lot of sense to move to the north of Scotland and at least have a chance of surviving the kind of event that may require it?