It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Liberal1984
I Totally disagree with both Aloysius the Gaul and daaskcapital!! A coup is good news for the people of North Korea because the dictatorship that exists there could hardly be worse.
Therefore the more changes of North Korean leadership there are, the higher the probability or a 1989 style implosion of totalitarianism (that is otherwise at least rationally, militarily undefeatable).
In Addition The Signs Are Extremely Good…
North Korea’s eternal state of war, does not personally serve even the Generals in North Korea (because even these people are now suffering shortages of certain goods) this has long been the case but there are reasons why they may be challenging Kim-Jung now…
1. He is even less interested in rational economic reforms than his daddy –something that must be making the powerful question their path.
Although accurate numbers are hard to come by, Chen Xiaohe, an expert on North Korea from Renmin University in China, estimates that GDP has grown since 2011 at between 1.7 and 2 percent. “This is a small economic improvement, but if we compare it with his father Kim Jong-il, the economy is today more stable and there is some economic development,” he says.
...
On the streets of Pyongyang, the minor “adjustments” – North Korean politicians don’t like the word “reform” because they consider it too daring – are easy to spot. The last few years have seen a host of cranes and building activity. The Ryugyong Hotel, which started construction in 1987 and wasn’t finished until 2011, now stands as a modern landmark in the capital. “Kim Jong-un has been spending a lot of money. They’ve been building a lot in Pyongyang and also along the border with China, where you’ll see new roads, some houses and new statues,” says Catchart, who has serious doubts about how long they can keep with the construction boom.
The economic growth has allowed for improved living conditions for most North Koreans, especially for those at the top. Kim Jong-un has gotten rid of his father’s austerity policy and Pyongyang has seen an increase in the number of privately run restaurants, luxury stores, and cellphones users. Four years ago it was difficult to spot a car in the North Korean capital, but today there are small traffic jams during rush hour.
2. The economic ideas he does have, seem to be further wrecking the country…
North Korea Ski Resort: www.bbc.co.uk...
3. He seems exceptionally brutal to those around him –perhaps too brutal.
4. He likes spending his free time picking pretty girls for music concerts, rather than running the country –this potentially makes him vulnerable to those around him.
It seems those around him have (metaphorically) simply given him enough chocolate to drown himself in it. Let’s hope this will be good news, for one of the world’s both most suppressed people, and political systems.
Personally…
I have long thought the way to make North Korea a democracy is to offer those who run it immunity for their crimes against humanity, and more money than they could ever spend.
This is the way to do it, because at the end of the day there’s a lot of powerful people in North Korea who don’t have everything they need. In addition to lacking material goods they live under fear, but fear only works if the person behind giving the fear is focussed on his job of both causing fear and competently delivering it.
It seems Kim Jung-un has been more focussed on pleasure, and that
War would be stupid (because with their WMD’s war could easily kill more people, than there actually are North Koreans).
Meanwhile I understand NK is unlikely to want immunity for their crimes against humanity, given this involves trust, and they already possess a far more stable guarantee of criminal immunity simply by remaining within NK (and keeping it a dictatorship).
However there is no harm in South Korea ensuring that (if NK’s leaders did want to give up the insecurities of wondering which want to be despot, is going to stab their despotic back… In exchange for the less stressful life a multi-millionaire lifestyle) then both the offer, and immunity in law, would be there.
Senior U.S. government officials handling Korean affairs arrived in Seoul Sunday to discuss ways to beef up the alliance between the two countries and other pending issues such as North Korea, Seoul officials said.
Assistant Deputy Secretary of State Daniel Russel and Assistant Deputy Secretary of Defense David Shear flied into Seoul late Sunday for a three-day visit before heading to Japan, officials said.
The trip comes after a North Korean military-party delegation met South Korean high-ranking officials on Saturday on a rare one-day visit to the South.
Seoul officials said that they and U.S. officials are likely to exchange views about the outcome of the recent talks with the North's delegation and their North Korean policy.
originally posted by: daaskapital
North Korea was progressing, ...
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: daaskapital
Last I checked everyday N. Korean could not own cell phones nor do they have internet access. The only ones who get those perks would be those living in the Capital (which you can live their by invite only) and high ranking party members.
The North Korean mobile telecommunications market has seen dramatic subscriber growth over the last five years, contrary to initial speculation that mobile services would be limited to the elite. Although North Korea is one of the world’s least-penetrated markets, with a penetration rate of around 9%, the influx of mobile handsets could potentially undermine the authoritarian regime’s social control system. However, North Korea seems to be far away from the threshold of a telecommunications revolution, and the regime remains stable, with no social disruption caused or supported by the mobile network.
Despite the large number of subscribers, the actual number of users is still controversial. In spite of much anecdotal evidence and growing conspicuous consumption, inactive numbers and distribution of cell phones for official use suggest that the number of actual users may be much fewer than what Orascom has reported. In addition, the prohibitive top-up rates have made general users reserve their calls for important messages or emergencies. New digital social networking remains an unreachable luxury for the general opulation, and traditional self-censorship prevents politically sensitive conversations from taking place on cell phones. Consequently, a “Korean Spring” is unlikely in the near future.
It is noteworthy that cell phones have introduced meaningful changes to private economic activities. The nationwide mobile network has allowed traders greater mobility and rapid exchanges of market information. They are able to make more profits by responding to changing market conditions at an unprecedented speed. This has led to the suppression of sharp increases in prices, to the benefit of consumers. Cell phones have also facilitated a burgeoning private money transfer system among traders, with clientele expanding to include recipients of money remitted from their defector families in South Korea.
In terms of economic I guess you have a valid point being their economy was below rock bottom. Nowhere to go but up. The issue again though is the changes are geared to attract foreign visitors and not so much for North Korean citizens.
The north still maintains their military first policies, which means the military gets food and supplies over the civilians, who get what's left, which is usually slim to none.
A crime against the state still results in 3 generations of the family serving time before "all is forgiven", provided they make it to the 2nd and 3rd generation. The stories from those who escaped make Nazi Germany's camps look quaint and tranquil.
We are talking about a government system that killed people because they did not show enough remorse when Kim Jong Il died.
originally posted by: daaskapital
I'm not excusing the regime. I made that perfectly clear in the thread of which i linked in my reply to FlyersFan. The slight progress of North Korea does not excuse the human rights violations cast at North Korea and Kim Jong-Un.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: daaskapital
I'm not excusing the regime. I made that perfectly clear in the thread of which i linked in my reply to FlyersFan. The slight progress of North Korea does not excuse the human rights violations cast at North Korea and Kim Jong-Un.
Sorry if it came across as accusatory as it was not my intent. I don't think you are making excuses for N. Korea and the info you provided supports the claims you made.
I am just leery of N. Korean "social advancement". Everything the N. Korean government has done and is doing is geared to supporting the regime, imo anyways. The restrictions in place on the phones and internet would be like Hitler telling people he has set up cell phones and internet access in the camps.
Since the only info you get is Nazi and the only people you can call are family / friends it does not really come ac4ross as doing something good for the people - if that makes sense.
Since N. Korean paranoia is light years ahead of Nazi Germany's I see this as nothing but an image campaign. Another example would be the Us citizen who travelled to North Korea who then ripped up his passport. His stated goal was to demonstrate how bad the human rights record was in N. Korea. He was tried and convicted and sent to a hard labor camp for 6 years.
The problem is he is kept in isolation and only works in the field for 8 hours. N. Korea is using this as an example of their human rights record.
Its nothing but a pr campaign.
Anyways - just raising a counter point based on my opinion. again not accusing you of anything - just engaging in debate .
originally posted by: daaskapital
Matthew Miller is most definitely being used as a tool. I expect he will be further used in upcoming negotiations between the North and South too.