It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A man with Ebola in Dallas was initially sent home from the hospital with antibiotics after seeking treatment for an unknown illness, officials said.
He had no symptoms when he left Liberia and began to show signs of the disease on Sept. 24, the CDC said. He sought care on Sept. 26, was hospitalized two days later at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital and is critically ill, said CDC Director Thomas Frieden. The agency is working to identify anybody who had contact with the man and track them down, he said.
After the patient sought medical care on Sept. 26 and was sent home with antibiotics, he returned in an ambulance to Texas Health Presbyterian two days later and was admitted, said Edward Goodman, an epidemiologist at the hospital. The ambulance workers and other health-care professionals who treated him are being monitored for symptoms, Goodman said.
Time will tell how this is going to be a complete catastrophe or just a partial one, thanks ER personal that send the guy home the first time.
originally posted by: Raxoxane
Apparently,on the 26th,he informed them at the hospital,that he was from Liberia.Sick.Liberia.And he was sent home.All your superior medical infrastructure and technology won't save you,if stupid on this level is in charge of it.a reply to: Indigent
originally posted by: Raxoxane
Apparently,on the 26th,he informed them at the hospital,that he was from Liberia.Sick.Liberia.And he was sent home.All your superior medical infrastructure and technology won't save you,if stupid on this level is in charge of it.a reply to: Indigent
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
originally posted by: Raxoxane
Apparently,on the 26th,he informed them at the hospital,that he was from Liberia.Sick.Liberia.And he was sent home.All your superior medical infrastructure and technology won't save you,if stupid on this level is in charge of it.a reply to: Indigent
Common sense took a vacation and many people may wind up paying with their lives. I can't even believe that they haven't shut down travel coming and going from these regions to try and prevent it from popping up here to begin with. Too little, too late obviously and nobody seems to even be considering shutting it all down even now. I know they hate to put people out and all, but damn... putting them in the ground seems a bit more serious than putting a restriction on some travel plans.
I guess that line of thinking is why they make the big bucks and I don't.
originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: grandmakdw
I think its harder than that, people can travel through Europe too, usually is even cheaper, are you going to stop all international flights?
originally posted by: drwill
a reply to: Hellas
Let's hope Patient Z had his (useless) antibiotic prescription filled via the pharmacy's drive-thru window.
Even if a family member took care of the prescription, who knows if he/she had been infected or how long the
virus took to present symptoms? And pharmacies are notorious for taking their time, encouraging customers to "look around the store" while they wait.
On another thread, it was mentioned that a journalist had traveled from the infected region, and while her temp had been checked before she boarded the flight, the buck stopped there, and when she got off the plane, no one checked anything. So comforting. I know that studies have shown quarantine doesn't stop the spread...I get it, I understand, but wouldn't a firmer approach at airports slow down the spread? It couldn't hurt--for now--right? Any studies on that? (I ask rhetorically.)