It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The image of a woman wearing a veil from head to toe, a woman who gets unfair justice or a woman who is not allowed to drive is an all too familiar notion when it comes to women treatment in Islam. And while there are Muslim countries in the world that do implement many harsh rulings against women, this should not be portrayed as Islamic law. Many of these countries have cultural differences that go against the teachings of Islam. It should be noted that during pre-Islam Arabia women were used for fornication only and had no independence. The birth of a daughter in a family was considered humiliating and the practice of female infanticide was uncontrolled. When Islam came to being, verses in the Quran condemned the practice of female infanticide. Islam gave back many human rights to the woman and Muhammad(s) was even reported saying that “women are the twin halves of men.” A Muslim woman is allowed to reject and accept any suitor for marriage and has the right to seek divorce. There is nothing in Islam that forbids a Muslim woman from exiting her house and is allowed to drive. Also in regards to education, a woman is obligated to seek knowledge and it is considered a sin if she refuses.
82% of Egyptian Muslims favor stoning adulterers
You think when these people are done with Islam they won't come after Christianity? Mark my words when this new world order is put into place every spiritual pursuit that draws mankind close to god and away from the worship of mankind will be a threat and a new enemy to feed to the war machine.
Because women are treated awesome in Christian countries. Hey, how long have they finally counted as people in the us? ...CIA now they never get shafted, raped, kept as slaves in good places like the US, right? Your scale has a very fat thumb on it.
originally posted by: charles1952
Cont.
His next point is:
But again, this is the problem, is that you make these facile arguments, like that, women are somehow mistreated in the Muslim world. But that's certainly true in many Muslim-majority countries.
What? He says that Maher is right! That's two for Maher and none for Azlan. Maher's wiping the floor with Azlan.
I wonder if FGM is considered by Azlan to be mistreatment of women?
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: majkaveli
This point has been brought up a couple of times. That because it's not in the (however you spell Koran) it's not a religious issue.
The Pope and Cardinals are not brought up in the Bible. Is it safe to say they have nothing to do with religion?
That's why the conclusion that it isn't a religious issue doesn't work so well.