The Truth about why US are in Syria

Most people know something's not right about why the USA/Britain are yet again poking their nose into others' affairs, and everyone is just stocking
up on all the propaganda being put out by the US/British governments and media outlets.

It's sickening just how much people are buying into it and painting all Muslims with the same brush.

The displays of bitterness and hatred towards Muslims from the world is dismal.

There are couple of reports (About ISIL) that are factual though, such as:

* ISIL murdering Christians, Yazidis and Shia Muslims and forcing them from their cities
* ISIL wanting to overthrow Shia controlled Governments, hence Iraq and Syria (Syria is a Sunni Majority population, but Assad himself is Shia)
* They want an Islamic state


But does anyone in their right mind think the US/NATO give two craps about ANY those?

NO! (The 2nd Two Yes, but that will become clearer).

Then there is the propaganda. Those 2/3 beheadings with the British speaking protagonist?

Staged! I've watched the video and I've watched a few video analysis of the video that PROVES, that the beheadings didn't occur.

It was all staged by British and US intelligence to sway public opinion.

I even remember an MSN poll asking Brits if the British Military should intervene in Iraq now (After what's happened), and the answer was an overwhelming yes; whereas just 2-3 weeks beforehand a similar question of intervention was asked when the murdering of Christians, Yazidis etc was happening, and the answer was a resounding "It's none of our business, we should stay out of it".

I kid you not, and I'm sure someone here may remember it.

Sorry I went off track there, but anyway in the video you don't actually see the beheading take place.

Now I've seen enough disturbing things on the Internet to be able to tell you EVERY SINGLE Islamic Extremist beheading shows the whole "Movie".

Not in these few videos though. And even when they have a bigger point to prove? Makes you go Hmmmm, no?

Why would they go through all that effort to prove a point to the US that they will kill US citizens and then not show the beheading take place, when every other video of Islamic Extremism shows it when they don't even have a point to prove to anyone?

The video analysis showing how and why the video is fake (I could post it, but it would be against T&C's), describes how there is 2 cuts to a normal knife blade's metal; the Bevel and the Edge.

Bevel is explained to be a bright stainless steel metal and should easily make reflections of sunlight in a real sharp knife.

However after going through different angles of the video there is no shine, glint or reflection coming from the blade used to apparently "behead" James Foley; meaning the blade was in fact blunt and could never possibly cut through an object; it was missing it's Bevel.

The video also show the apparent "Cutting" for around 6 seconds. And guess what? No blood visible what so ever. After over 6 seconds of cutting.

That's astonishing. The video even goes through different Contrasts, Brightness and Colours, yet not one drop to be seen. As I've said I've seen enough beheading videos to know that blood spurts almost immediately after a cut.

The video does a better job of not only describing it but also showing it.

Not to mention the dubbed over British voice.

This whole video was staged to sway public opinion; believe it or don't, it's true and it worked.

I could show all skeptics and anti-Muslims the video, but most of you will still dismiss it.

Still, even "if" the beheading WAS real, do you still think the US would give a damn about those people?

Do you think that's reason enough to go into a foreign country to fight people that pose NO threat to yours?

ISIL never made any threats to the US or anyone else. If they wanted to attack, they'd have done it from the inside and no-one would have seen it coming. They don't want to attack. Their goal and the US's is the same.

The truth about why the US/Nato/Britain are in the middle East (Again), is to overthrow Assad.

Where are the US airstrikes occurring at this moment? Syria.

Wow, they haven't been there yet!

And they're bombing OIL REFINERIES. These are ASSAD's economic assets. The US and ISIL are on the same side folks. They've been armed, trained and funded by the US and Saudis, and probably more countries.

The Saudi's WANT a UNITED Middle East just like the European Union. This is their Caliphate, and they need the help from US/Nato/Britain.

In exchange for handsome Oil Deals that is!

Syria are in the way of that with a Shia leader. Iran as a country are in they way of that as a Shia country.

This is part of the NWO plan. United Continents/regions and eventually One Government.

CONCLUSION/TL;DR: ISIL are the military wing of the Saudi's who's role is to overthrow non Sunni Governments (No willing governments) to implement a United Middle East and it requires the help from US/Nato

Iran are next on the cards.

PS: I'm sure David Cameron will be trying to get me extradited to Britain as I pose as much danger to the world as ISIS. lol

If true, this may be the most successful propaganda campaign ever.
I can see how well it has worked by talking to people at work about ISIS.
Everyone seems to think they are the biggest threat the US has ever seen.
In my opinion, they cant do more damage than one of the many mass murderers we have seen here lately.
Maybe I'm ignorant though

Exactly Correct!

a reply to: Chipkin9

First off lets get the name right ISIL (Levant). Why all the different name changes I thought I better Look into this.....

Levant

Now why Is Obama saying this.

He's indicating to us that he wants us to know what his intentions are and that is....



Starts to make it a little bit clearer now doesn't it...

Am not the biggest fan of JB but in this video he get to the point of what most people are missing..

a reply to: RayVon

Fair point.

I never even give it any thought that ISIL is a more appropriate abbreviation for them, since the Levant has very historical roots in the Arab world.

I don't think it's to do with running Israel into the sea though.

I'm of the belief that if ISIL wanted to do anything about Israel; then there best chance was when Israel were on their bombing campaign of Gaza just recently.

ETA: Any idea how to change the thread title from ISIS to ISIL?
ETA: I never had ISIS in the thread title, DOH!

originally posted by: Chipkin9
a reply to: RayVon

Fair point.

I never even give it any thought that ISIL is a more appropriate abbreviation for them, since the Levant has very historical roots in the Arab world.

I don't think it's to do with running Israel into the sea though.

I'm of the belief that if ISIL wanted to do anything about Israel; then there best chance was when Israel were on their bombing campaign of Gaza just recently.

ETA: Any idea how to change the thread title from ISIS to ISIL?

Sorry chipkin wasn't directing at you fella.
You do have a point tho.. I just wanted to put it out there for the some who don't really know about about the L

Great post by the by .

originally posted by: o0oTOPCATo0o
Maybe I'm ignorant though

Or more awake and aware of current world events

a reply to: Chipkin9

Oh, but you wrong, wrong, Wronggggg, yes, wrong, hear me, we are fighting ISIS no the Syrian government.

(Yes I been sarcastic),



Before people were complaining about getting in Syria, but how you noticed that is nothing complaining about bombing "ISIS" in Syria.

originally posted by: RayVon

originally posted by: Chipkin9
a reply to: RayVon

Fair point.

I never even give it any thought that ISIL is a more appropriate abbreviation for them, since the Levant has very historical roots in the Arab world.

I don't think it's to do with running Israel into the sea though.

I'm of the belief that if ISIL wanted to do anything about Israel; then there best chance was when Israel were on their bombing campaign of Gaza just recently.

ETA: Any idea how to change the thread title from ISIS to ISIL?

Sorry chipkin wasn't directing at you fella.
You do have a point tho.. I just wanted to put it out there for the some who don't really know about about the L

Great post by the by .

No worries man, I never thought there was any offence directed at me

I'm actually grateful of the video you posted it was an eye opener for me about the "L" instead of the "S", even though I knew what they stood for.

Thanks!

originally posted by: Chipkin9

originally posted by: RayVon

originally posted by: Chipkin9
a reply to: RayVon

Fair point.

I never even give it any thought that ISIL is a more appropriate abbreviation for them, since the Levant has very historical roots in the Arab world.

I don't think it's to do with running Israel into the sea though.

I'm of the belief that if ISIL wanted to do anything about Israel; then there best chance was when Israel were on their bombing campaign of Gaza just recently.

ETA: Any idea how to change the thread title from ISIS to ISIL?

Sorry chipkin wasn't directing at you fella.
You do have a point tho.. I just wanted to put it out there for the some who don't really know about about the L

Great post by the by .

No worries man, I never thought there was any offence directed at me

I'm actually grateful of the video you posted it was an eye opener for me about the "L" instead of the "S", even though I knew what they stood for.

Thanks!

Yeah man

I am just thinking maybe their is more to this then meet the eye maybe. I mean it is Obama.

I was reading a little about this last night and also come arcoss that syria (Iran too) is one of the last independent banks around and Assad is no dumb guy unlike gaddafi and saddam. Not to say he is a good guy too.

Head hurts to much too compute.

It's an incredibly successful propaganda campaign which highlights how good a job the western governments have done cultivating an uninformed and apathetic population.

I've had more than one student spew the the rhetoric, telling me that they are very frightened. My favorite was a 12 year old who was given an assignment from her social studies teacher to ask people she knows if they knew what ISIS stands for as well as what ISIL stands for and what the difference is. I was the only person who knew anything at all out of about a dozen people she asked.

The Truth about why US are in Syria?

I thought it's all about natural gas pipelines to Europe.

The Sunnis vs the Shiites.

originally posted by: RayVon
a reply to: Chipkin9

Am not the biggest fan of JB but in this video he get to the point of what most people are missing..

Damn, I missed that ... but he's probably right.

originally posted by: xuenchen
The Truth about why US are in Syria?

I thought it's all about natural gas pipelines to Europe.

The Sunnis vs the Shiites.

That's a small part of the reason. Israel wants Syria. They want to finish what they have started after taking control of the Golan Heights. Israel wants Syria, Iraq and Lebanon for their 'Greater Israel' land expansion scheme. Hence the creation of the ISIL and the lies saying that they are bombing them in Syria.

It's like a piece of Spaghetti. Start at one end and work your way to the other until it's devoured.

Start bombing the ISIL then finish off bombing Assad!

a reply to: Hilux1996

Perhaps.

But the Syrian "civil war" started right after the Shiite pipeline agreements were signed.

That put a dent in the Qatar/Saudi pipeline plan.

But then, maybe Israel had the perfect "timing" all figured out?

Is that the perception?

originally posted by: bjarneorn

originally posted by: RayVon
a reply to: Chipkin9

Am not the biggest fan of JB but in this video he get to the point of what most people are missing..

Damn, I missed that ... but he's probably right.

Lol I know what you're saying....Just more about the L then the dramatic effects from JB.

a reply to: xuenchen

Very true. That was the 'Islamic Pipeline' deal that was signed by 4 countries in 2011. Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon if I'm not mistaken. Thanks for reminding me.

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel and the US were busy building the Arab pipeline but couldn't get it to go through Syria. That will be the big reason why they are attacking Syria. What also fits into this equation is Palestine. Off the Gaza shore the Palestinians own a Gas field that has been discovered to have at least 1.4 Trillion Cubic Feet of Gas in it's reservoir. Israel wants this and needs it to expand it's Leviathan Gas Field which in turn they want to expand also into the Syrian Gas Fields.

So basically this attack on the ISIL then soon to be Assad is about Gas and their Pipeline deal with Saudi Arabia.

And the more you think of it this coincides with the Ukraine / Russia stand off. Who supplies Europe with Gas? Russia.

And who are Russia allies with? Syria and Iran.

See the connections? Hell Yes!

a reply to: Hilux1996

And to add, I think Russia's best interests are to keep all conflicts going in the ME.

Very complicated.

a reply to: Chipkin9
That's true and someone finally speaks the truth.. It was never about ISIS or any other rebel group, it was the meant to justify the bombings. They failed with the rebel funding so they turned to the problem they caused in Iraq to give the right to bomb Assad economy sectors, military bases etc.

But I bet there are a few flag waving monkeys that are clapping and dancing to the flute. US/NATO democracy = bomb everything, kill as many as possible,blame someone else and then profit...

a reply to: Hilux1996

Russia moved on and forged the Euro Asian Union which includes - Turkey,China,India,Few European Nations and a soon to be member Japan. Putin is ahead of Obama and the monkeys that fund him, it is actually quiet funny because America does not realize it's going to bite them in the ass for what they are doing.