Black Triangle UFOs and an Alleged Breakaway Civilization- Discuss

a reply to: Baddogma

No. They are not to be made public, even in a cliffs notes form.

a reply to: Baddogma

Hey Baddogma,

TO respect the privacy of anyone who IM's me I do not copy and paste conversations in IM to the public. SO nope no quotes from private sources. On the bright side anything you say to me in private will stay that way too.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Same image quality, lots of detail. No rivets. All smooth. No seams, or vents. Looked like a solid shell in triangular form.

a reply to: Zaphod58

I know... I mean the story... the history... what the other humans look like (allegedly) and such... nothing else... at all. No actual private conversations... just the loose info, factiods people might want to know.

Most of it was already discussed in the forums already... just details he didn't have the time to provide is all... and nothing technical.

Private means private and there is NO way I'd break that trust.

a reply to: Baddogma

If it's been discussed then there is no reason to post it. If it hasn't, then you'll have to find another source. PM means just that. No posting even a portion of a PM is permitted.

16f.) Private Messages: You will not use the private messaging system to send mass messages to multiple member accounts. All private messages are subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use and the Terms and Conditions of Membership. Violations will result in immediate account termination. You also agree that Private Messages are confidential. You will not post or publically display messages received from TAN, their agents, or any other members, in any way, without the written permission of the author. TAN, at their discretion, may review the content of your private messages when, and only when, complaints are received from the recipient(s) of your messages

a reply to: Zaphod58

I won't post a scrap of PMs... solid promise.

a reply to: Baddogma

Notice the words IN ANY WAY.

Haha sounds like some of you got some really interesting PM's! I'm jealous!

a reply to: Arpad

so thinking it makes very little sense and wanting to understand this story more than what he originally said is derailment?.

hmm? so what? so its ok to follow some story cause it matters so much to people because of a few occurrences even if the story might be complete bull? I thought this whole website was dedicated to finding the truth and not believing everything you read/told/shown without first questioning it.

like I said in a previous post there's nothing amiss in the skies except in American cities by the looks of it, and again as I said earlier if these crafts have such high tech cloaking why would there be anything amiss where this thing is? why would they ever uncloak and let you see it if they want to keep it such a secret?

again I am simply trying to understand more I'm not here to derail or prove this is false or whatever.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Duly noticed. I get it. Really... and I don't mean just due to the t&c either... I get it.

Well I vented some of my distaste for the story if true, just signing up I don't expect much acknowdgement of posts at this point. I know I am not in the club at all but this is the stuff that drew me in finally after all these years. Even titor on the other forum didn't do it lol.

I am just making some mental notes maybe questions. I remember something being mentioned about the craft being grown partially? It seems that has popped up before?

Also if you look right in the right way? I probably should look back to quote properly.


One veteran/current dod (guy who generally only knows his job and nothing special) to another. If any real information was messaged to someone else that is not in the program well those beans have been spilled as far as I am concerned...not like posting on the board but damn if this is need to know only technical info and you are on the project and you give that basically to a stranger in a pm ....Come On..really? especially non military wow.



I

originally posted by: usafage
Well I vented some of my distaste for the story if true, just signing up I don't expect much acknowdgement of posts at this point. I know I am not in the club at all but this is the stuff that drew me in finally after all these years. Even titor on the other forum didn't do it lol.

I am just making some mental notes maybe questions. I remember something being mentioned about the craft being grown partially? It seems that has popped up before?

Also if you look right in the right way? I probably should look back to quote properly.


One veteran/current dod (guy who generally only knows his job and nothing special) to another. If any real information was messaged to someone else that is not in the program well those beans have been spilled as far as I am concerned...not like posting on the board but damn if this is need to know only technical info and you are on the project and you give that basically to a stranger in a pm ....Come On..really? especially non military wow.

I

Agreed, it's one thing if you pm info...but to PM a select few who have had an experience and then make an entire thread about those secret pm's is suspicious. To me it screams issues. He hung around and fed off of other's experiences and then after he gained their trust, exploited them as references. Your basic dis-info tactic.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

So the image was more vivid than the laws
of physics would allow for the distance
and speed of the 'object' ?

That's how it was for me anyway....
which in conjunction with other
factors made me understand
the mystery.

Kev

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: BASSPLYR

So the image was more vivid than the laws
of physics would allow for the distance
and speed of the 'object' ?

That's how it was for me anyway....
which in conjunction with other
factors made me understand
the mystery.

Kev

So what impression did you get, if i may ask.

What is the reason it does not seem to follow the same laws.... what did you understand from what you saw?

BTW... did u post this story already? im interested in reading it

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Well I was experiencing Tachypsychia (everything slows down and is embedded in your memory in detail. ) Goes with an adrenalin dump. SO to me I can replay those two seconds over and over again like I'm going through a series of photos, or hitting rewind and pause on a video. Plus I have a pretty good photographic memory.

The most detail of the craft what when it was directly overhead. I can remember that almost like my mind took a snap shot of it. When it was coming at me (directly at me) I remember in detail the movements the craft made the strange stuff the field around it was doing. But my fondest memory was of it after it passed and banked back inland gracefully. It was so smooth and fast it just looked and felt so triumphant. it was a definite HELL YEAH!!!!! pump your fist into the air and shout USA!!! moment.

I dunno it could have been an illusion or something as inferred from your previous post, but I really, really, really, really really doubt it.

a reply to: Baddogma

On the subject of those pms, without saying anything at all about them, perhaps you would be able to answer a quick question without causing issues.

The question:

In your opinion, if the entirety of the pms were to be made public how would they effect the debate.
Maybe on a scale of 1 to 10
1 being: no effect at all, just drivel
10 being: all doubt is removed, earth shattering info.

If this even is a no go, I certainly would understand.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Your story is fascinating...

I have too many questions for you. But one point nobody has brought up yet..... how is it possible that all these black triangle craft have been flying the skies for over 40 years and never has any of them had a malfunction or error and crashed to the ground. Or maybe it has? i dunno....

Is that tech error-free so to speak? Because imagine if one did crash and make touchdown on the ground.... imagine the ***storm that would ensue.... if the whole world new media had their eyes on such a thing....

Is this not a risk when flying these things over cities?

a reply to: Jenisiz

One could also argue that a thread being made about said topic suddenly being full of people discounting the original story is a dis-info psy-op in and of itself.

I find it amusing how this topic has brought so many out of the woodwork.

a reply to: BASSPLYR


Reminds me of the Northrop Grumman Commercial when you wanted the future moment shadow over the clouds. I thought that was fantastic not sure if that machine and the the triangle are one in the same. If they are they better get their timeline straight. If they come out and say it's been around 40 years operational for the last few wars but it just wasn't right to use well you go tell that to some of the families that have a permanent hole in them. IF this thing is the end all to be all as it has been alluded to.



I don't doubt the triangle much at all it's operational time line troubles me it better have not been good to go until just recently even though some of the sightings surely suggest otherwise.

a reply to: usafage

Reminds me of the Northrop Grumman Commercial when you wanted the future moment shadow over the clouds.

I embedded it for all to see...

Interesting.... this reminds me of the USAF commercial that was mentioned in OP. Are Ad's trying to disclose something to the masses?