It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: Xeven
originally posted by: Merinda
India does not have to pay its personnel as handsomely as the US. Also while reaching Mars is quite a feat one would have to look how sophisticated the package is India sent and therefore expensive.
So NASA should contract India to do our future Mars Satellites. Then American companies can either cut cost or die.
NASA can't currently do a "study" of exploration for 75 mil.
SpaceX and companies like it are the future of space exploration. Let NASA work as a consulting agency, put them in charge of mission control, and have the private companies build the equipment and fund the missions.
The costs are inflated because they know the government is working with an unlimited budget.
And it’s nuts from the start. NASA’s budget is a pittance compared with pretty much everything else the government does. President Obama’s proposed national budget for 2015 is $3.9 trillion. NASA’s budget is less than half a percent of that (0.45 percent to be more accurate).
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Answer
The costs are inflated because they know the government is working with an unlimited budget.
NASA has an unlimited budget?
And it’s nuts from the start. NASA’s budget is a pittance compared with pretty much everything else the government does. President Obama’s proposed national budget for 2015 is $3.9 trillion. NASA’s budget is less than half a percent of that (0.45 percent to be more accurate).
www.slate.com...
BTW, you know that NASA uses a competitive bidding process, right? You know that the prime contractors also use competitive bids for their subcontractors, right?
prod.nais.nasa.gov...
Why do you think Microsoft call centers are in India?
originally posted by: Phage
Why do you think Microsoft call centers are in India?