Evidence of demolition company at 9/11

Where exactly did you get that stupid claim from? Why do truthers keep making up nonsense with no basis in any fact?

or www.history.com...

All you Official Story Types are so rude.

originally posted by: ugmold

Where exactly did you get that stupid claim from? Why do truthers keep making up nonsense with no basis in any fact?

Oh, a youtube video of someone who had nothing at all to do with the design or construction of the WTC!

Let us see what Leslie E. Robertson, the lead structural engineer for the WTC said.

The buildings survived the impact of the Boeing 767 aircraft, an impact very much greater than had been contemplated in our design (a slow-flying Boeing 707 lost in the fog and seeking a landing field). Therefore, the robustness of the towers was exemplary. At the same time, the fires raging in the inner reaches of the buildings undermined their strength.

www.nae.edu...

You really should not believe just a youtube video!

a reply to: hellobruce
There was a video of Yamasaki saying 2 planes, I couldn't find it. These things get deleted by You Tube all the time, this guy was the The Construction and Project Manager. I would hope he had a handle on the Design.

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: jaffo
OMG this is so inane. Seriously, if they were going to blow the buildings up with super duper secret thermite...WHY USE THE PLANES AT ALL?! Jeez, this is so frigging obvious! I mean really, if you filled the whole damned things with explosives, WHY NOT JUST USE THAT AND BLAME THE TERRORISTS?! Why the need for the planes at all?! Really, this is such an obvious failure of basic logic on the part of the truthers. There had been a documented attempt to bring the buildings down by way of using explosives previously. If you want to have some super duper secret plan to...well, I don't know, whatever it is you truthers think is the goal here...then why not just, you know, USE EXPLOSIVES AGAIN WITHOUT THE NEED FOR PLANES?! I mean really, this is SO OBVIOUSLY A LOGICAL PROBLEM FOR TRUTHERS, lol...

The '93 attempt didn't get a lot of attention. All of the damage was in the parking garage. The '01 attack used planes not only to get maximum attention from people all over the world but also to justify the cross boarder spying and airport security, no-fly lists and it scares people.

How would the OS explain how that much explosives made it into the building unnoticed? If they could have blamed it on terrorists they would have and saved themselves the trouble of convincing people to accept the retarded claim of progressive collapse. 13 years later and they are still teying to convince people because the story is THAT weak.

Watch These Movies on DVDS or Blu Ray Not You Tube.

Long Kiss Goodnight 5 years Prior
Close to the Ending ( The CIA Fund Raiser Scene ) 5 years Prior Talks About the 93 Bombing of the WTC and ! Doing it Again Taking it Down killing over 2,000 People Blame the Muslims !

TV Series ( Short Lived Hmm Wonder Why Only 6 Episodes )::: The Lone Gunman 1st Episode The Pilot 6 Months Prior before it Actually Happened ... Another FUND RAISER!

The conspiracy of 9/11 - A scene from "The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996)" (Subtitled)




World Trade Center Attack Confirmation in 1996


Go See it For Real Now !!

The Long Kiss Goodnight
www.amazon.com...=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1411602191&sr=1-1&keywords=long+kiss+goodnig ht+movie



9/11 Predicted on The Lone Gunmen


Lone Gunmen March 4, 2001 PILOT EPISODE


Go See it For Real NOW!!!!!!!!!!!

The Lone Gunmen: The Complete Series
www.amazon.com...


Some from within Was Hinting ! Life Imitates ART..

originally posted by: ugmold
I would hope he had a handle on the Design.

he was 12 when it was built...

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: ugmold
I would hope he had a handle on the Design.

he was 12 when it was built...

Ya, he knew nothing about the buildings, just had the title and was an Architect. He died on 911. So the interview was before it happened.

I'll see if I can come up with the Yamasaki video, that is where I draw my quote from, half of my saved 911 videos I saved are gone.

originally posted by: ugmold

And really, I'd love for you or one of these fireman or anyone else to explain to me in your completely "expert" opinion .

Expert, how about the PHD that Engineered the Elevatotor system in the Twin Towers. Yes he said the Official Story is impossible, he and over 2000 other Architects and Engineers. See the movie, all Architects, Engineers and PHD's.

Sorry, I'm a bit rusty, haven't debated 911 in awhile so I forgot this one.

Yeah, that supposed list of "over 2000 architects and engineers" is a joke. You would know this if you had bothered to vet them. The truther movement is utter nonsense and a complete waste of time. A bunch of wackos flew planes into buildings and the buildings fell down as a result. Get over it and move on with your life.

originally posted by: ugmold

Where exactly did you get that stupid claim from? Why do truthers keep making up nonsense with no basis in any fact?

or www.history.com...

All you Official Story Types are so rude.

And you truthers are utterly clueless and have no interest whatsoever in truth. It's embarrassing.

Yeah, that supposed list of "over 2000 architects and engineers" is a joke. You would know this if you had bothered to vet them. The truther movement is utter nonsense and a complete waste of time. A bunch of wackos flew planes into buildings and the buildings fell down as a result. Get over it and move on with your life.

Explain the Joke, I seem to have missed it. Insults don't add much to the debate, you are adding nothing.

Here they are: www.ae911truth.org...

a reply to: jaffo
Once again, saying nothing. I'm the one who should be throwing out the insults, you are weak.

a reply to: ugmold

Explain the Joke,

A big part of the joke are the backgrounds of the 2000.
Go to their site and look closely at their degrees and experience.
Almost all of them could not be used in court as they have no qualifications to speek about the events of 911.

Plus not a single person on that site has examined the evidence first hand. All of their beliefs are based on Youtube videos.
Any first year law student would get them thrown out of court.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: ugmold

Explain the Joke,

A big part of the joke are the backgrounds of the 2000.
Go to their site and look closely at their degrees and experience.
Almost all of them could not be used in court as they have no qualifications to speek about the events of 911.

Plus not a single person on that site has examined the evidence first hand. All of their beliefs are based on Youtube videos.
Any first year law student would get them thrown out of court.

So what makes you an Authority?

Try tearing apart these guys: The Engineer who designed the Elevator System in The Towers is one of them, I know you won't watch, you are in a State of Cognitive Dissonance, poor boy.

originally posted by: ugmold
a reply to: jaffo
Once again, saying nothing. I'm the one who should be throwing out the insults, you are weak.

I imagine the insults are to piss people off so they can loose their cool and get reported and possibly banned. Either that or it just shows their ignorance.

I have never understood where deniers get their passion from. At least us truthers are passionate about the truth and want justice. It's as though deniers can't stand people who ask questions and won't stay in line and shut up.

Stay cool ugmold, you're doing just fine.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
At least us truthers are passionate about the truth and want justice.

No, truthers do not care about the truth or facts, they prefer silly made up stories and lies to what actually happened.

Which is why 13 years after the event no one takes them seriously, they are just ignored or laughed at for their silly ideas which do not make any sense.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
At least us truthers are passionate about the truth and want justice.

No, truthers do not care about the truth or facts, they prefer silly made up stories and lies to what actually happened.

That is pretty funny since the entire progressive collapse is just a theory and a pretty ignorant one to say the least.

Which is why 13 years after the event no one takes them seriously, they are just ignored or laughed at for their silly ideas which do not make any sense.

You wish....

EVERY MOMENT YOU SPEND inquiring deeply or fixing on WTC7 is a WASTED moment. It is fascinating and interesting as all aspects of 9/11 are -- but WTC7 is irrelevant. My statement might come as a shock to you. But consider these three things,

1. WTC7 was NOT a classic steel structure. It was built over a Con Edison transformer farm with cantilevered trusses. It was built on the edge of the 'bathtub' where even slight ground deformation, such as that caused by the collapse of WTC1, might destabilize it.

2. On the afternoon of 9/11 after the WTC1/2 collapses, such deformation was observed. In the firefighter testimonies there are several announcements of this fact, which caused FDNY to attempt to evacuate personnel digging in the rubble at GZ because they believed Seven was unstable and would soon collapse.

3. NO DEATHS are officially attributed to the collapse of Building Seven. Establishing controlled demolition for this building would carry no criminal penalty of murder and would amount to, at most, insurance fraud.

...

Thus early on in my own investigation I concluded (#1,#2) that Building Seven is the ONLY building that would not have needed explosives to fall on that day as it did. And (#3) would make Building Seven the perfect 'safe' PSYOP distraction by the real planners of 9/11, and their collusive partners, around which to gather people concerned about the possibility of controlled demolition. A 'corral' if you will.

Every moment of attention spent on WTC7 does not bring anyone closer to unraveling the mystery of the eerily similar WTC1/2 collapses because its structure was vulnerable and different, and like any good straw man, the rational explanation of 7's fall is in plain sight and waiting to be pointed out. And it grieves me that so few others besides myself have even tried.

Over the years of pursuing answers, I have met many personalities on the 'net who gloss over the circumstances of WTC1/2 collapse and fixate on Seven, which is regrettable. I also have encountered this behavior in several luminaries of 9/11 research to seemed to be actively steering away from the Towers' destruction and gathering people to fix on Seven, which I find suspicious.

So (especially to those new to the issue) I suggest, do not be distracted. If you are interested in the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11, I look at these resources I laid out in a previous post,. And if you are the least bit uncomfortable imagining George W Bush personally ordering the death of 3,000 people, check out an alternative theory of events which I believe is more compatible with observed behavior on that day.

I love the fact that people can actually believe that flying planes into the buildings would not have in any way disrupted the ENORMOUS VOLUME of wires and detonators and explosives that would have been needed to bring down the buildings in a controlled demolition. Jeezus this is so much idiocy, lol...

a reply to: jaffo

Finally something to ponder, good point.

originally posted by: jaffo
I love the fact that people can actually believe that flying planes into the buildings would not have in any way disrupted the ENORMOUS VOLUME of wires and detonators and explosives that would have been needed to bring down the buildings in a controlled demolition. Jeezus this is so much idiocy, lol...

Three words

Doctor Judy Wood

originally posted by: Another_Nut

originally posted by: jaffo
I love the fact that people can actually believe that flying planes into the buildings would not have in any way disrupted the ENORMOUS VOLUME of wires and detonators and explosives that would have been needed to bring down the buildings in a controlled demolition. Jeezus this is so much idiocy, lol...

Three words

Doctor Judy Wood

Six Words: Magic weapons not proven to exist.