It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Graystar
I would like to know who it was that originaly created them.
they are chemically enhanced molecules, created by forcing H atoms into the holes of the natural cis form fatty acids
Originally posted by Nygdan
trans fats exist in nature no?
they are chemically enhanced molecules, created by forcing H atoms into the holes of the natural cis form fatty acids
You make it sound so mean, the poor double bonded carbons being violated by these insidious hydrogen atoms and resulting in an evil trans oil. Instead of having the carbon groups on the 'same' side of the double bond (cis), trans fats have their carbon groups on opposite sides of the bond. This is not a 'trivial' matter, but lets keep some perspective.
I don't think anyone will disagree that proper diet is a good thing, but this doesn't seem like quite the nefarious and evil conspiracy you are making it out to be. Its not exactly something new either right? Heart disease is aproblem and a large part of that problem is trans-fats no?
Originally posted by Nygdan
I don't think anyone will disagree that proper diet is a good thing, but this doesn't seem like quite the nefarious and evil conspiracy you are making it out to be. Its not exactly something new either right? Heart disease is aproblem and a large part of that problem is trans-fats no?
Originally posted by mattison0922
Do you take issue with this because it's posted in a conspiracy forum like ATS? Do you feel while it's unhealthy to consume, it's not a conspiracy and thus doesn't belong in this forum? Not trying to set you up for an argument or anything, I am just curious.
aelita
in that the industry doesn't seem to spend enough resources to scrutinize the health effects of trans-fats and find an alternative
Originally posted by Nygdan
Perhaps that is my issue with the post, I'd agree that anything that gets people aware is certainly good on its own, but I'm not convinced that an industry wide conspiracy is required to get different companies to create and use the stuff.
in that the industry doesn't seem to spend enough resources to scrutinize the health effects of trans-fats and find an alternative
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by Graystar
I would like to know who it was that originaly created them.
trans fats exist in nature no?
they are chemically enhanced molecules, created by forcing H atoms into the holes of the natural cis form fatty acids
You make it sound so mean, the poor double bonded carbons being violated by these insidious hydrogen atoms and resulting in an evil trans oil. Instead of having the carbon groups on the 'same' side of the double bond (cis), trans fats have their carbon groups on opposite sides of the bond. This is not a 'trivial' matter, but lets keep some perspective.
I don't think anyone will disagree that proper diet is a good thing, but this doesn't seem like quite the nefarious and evil conspiracy you are making it out to be. Its not exactly something new either right? Heart disease is aproblem and a large part of that problem is trans-fats no?
To give a brief basic idea of its creation, it involves bubbling hydrogen through the oils so that it forces it to become soluble in water,
the byprduct of this is it increases the amount of satuated fat contained in the end produce.
As we all know, satuated fats are little killers in their own packet if left to go unchecked by monosatuates.
Originally posted by mattison0922
To give a brief basic idea of its creation, it involves bubbling hydrogen through the oils so that it forces it to become soluble in water,
You can bubble all the hydrogen you want through fats, and they will never become soluble in water. Saturation certainly doesn't increase the solubility of fats. Furthermore the process isn't this simple; it involves heavy metal catalysts, simply bubbling hydrogen through through fat isn't going to make it saturated, at least not in an industrially usable way. The process, as I understand was first developed using Ni catalysts, and has since moved on to using Pt or Pd catalysts... at least this is what they teach you in organic chemistry.
the byprduct of this is it increases the amount of satuated fat contained in the end produce.
It's not a byproduct, it's the point. Hydrogenation has nothing to do with making fats soluble, the point is to make fats solid at room temperature.
As we all know, satuated fats are little killers in their own packet if left to go unchecked by monosatuates.
While I certainly agree, that too much saturated fat is bad, there exist those who would argue otherwise. Mercola's site goes into this in great detail. Not saying I agree with his outlook but some would argue that saturated fats are in fact, healthy, and that the human being is more 'evolved' to digest saturated fats.
Originally posted by timberwulf
You want to know what a real killer is, just read this article. I bet most wouldn't be able to give up the addiction. And this was written way back in 1957.
seasilver.threadnet.com...