It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nanotechnology theorist Robert Freitas has brainstormed several possible variations of planet-killing nanotech, including aerovores (a.k.a. grey dust), grey plankton, grey lichens, and so-called biomass killers. Aeorovores would blot out all sunlight, grey plankton would consist of seabed-grown replicators that eat up land-based carbon-rich ecology, grey lichens would destroy land-based geology, and biomass killers would attack various organism
One of the best things about computers is that you can make them sum a million columns in a spreadsheet without them getting resentful or bored. Since we plan to use artificial intelligence in place of human intellectual labor, I think it would be immoral to purposely program it to be conscious. Trapping a conscious being inside a machine and forcing it to do work for you is isomorphic to slavery.
Last year, for example, scientists from the Netherlands used brain scan data and computer algorithms to determine which letters a person was looking at. The breakthrough hinted at the potential for a third party to reconstruct human thoughts at an unprecedented level of detail, including what we see, think, and remember. Such devices, if used en masse by some kind of totalitarian regime or police state, would make life intolerable. It would introduce an Orwellian world in which our "thought crimes" could actually be enforced.
Incredibly, we've already taken the first steps toward this goal. Recently, an international team of neuroscientists set up an experiment that allowed participants to engage in brain-to-brain communication over the Internet. Sure, it's exciting, but this tech-enabled telepathy could open a pandora's box of problems. Perhaps the best — and scariest — treatment of this possibility was portrayed in Ghost in the Shell, in which an artificially intelligent hacker was capable of modifying the memories and intentions of its victims. Now imagine such a thing in the hands of organized crime and paranoid governments.
Unlike remote-controlled drones, military robots could identify targets and destroy them without a human giving the final order to shoot. The dangers of such technology should be obvious, but it goes beyond the immediate threat of "friendly fire" incidents in which robots mistakenly kill people from their own side of a conflict, or even innocent civilians.
...[Uploading] the mind of a convicted criminal and running it a million times faster than normal would enable the uploaded criminal to serve a 1,000 year sentence in eight-and-a-half hours. This would, obviously, be much cheaper for the taxpayer than extending criminals' lifespans to enable them to serve 1,000 years in real time. Further, the eight-and-a-half hour 1,000-year sentence could be followed by a few hours (or, from the point of view of the criminal, several hundred years) of treatment and rehabilitation. Between sunrise and sunset, then, the vilest criminals could serve a millennium of hard labour and return fully rehabilitated either to the real world (if technology facilitates transferring them back to a biological substrate) or, perhaps, to exile in a computer simulated world.
It's a prospect that's particularly chilling when you consider lifespans of indefinite length, along with the nearly boundless possibilities for psychological and physical anguish.
Almost anything we can imagine can come in to fruition
originally posted by: Thebel
And if time travel is possible, why we haven't seen any obvious time travellers?
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
Almost anything we can imagine can come in to fruition
One time I told my father "anything is possible if you can think it you can do it"
To that he replied oh bull shyt you cant walk to the moon no matter how much you think about it.
That kind of killed my anything is possible days.
originally posted by: sarra1833
originally posted by: Thebel
And if time travel is possible, why we haven't seen any obvious time travellers?
I like to entertain the idea that if they DID travel, it was to change something. If they succeeded in changing something, we'd never know in the now because all the past would be altered but would be 'normal' to us. The only ones who would know something had been changed would be those who sent the person back - even then they'd have to mind wipe I would assume.
Imagine making a career out of changing the past. If you had to remember how everything was originally, man...... you'd never keep the time lines straight and folks would lock ya up in a mental ward.
maybe that's why some ARE in a mental ward.
Do you see what your post did to me? It made me start thinking all deep and odd and stuff.
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
Almost anything we can imagine can come in to fruition
One time I told my father "anything is possible if you can think it you can do it"
To that he replied oh bull shyt you cant walk to the moon no matter how much you think about it.
That kind of killed my anything is possible days.