It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Metallicus
Or "How To Be A Victim 101."
Pathetic attempt to "teach" people.
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
Right i'm not sure how i would find statistics on incidents like that which did not end in violence. I will look though, maybe you should to?
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: Lipton
Do you really feel like playing the odds?
Either way you are still playing the odds. Having a gun doesn't make you indestructible.
– Victims crying or pleading were raped 96% of the time
– Victims who loudly screamed were raped between 44% and 50% of the time
– Victims who ran were raped 15% of the time
– Victims who forcefully resisted (without a weapon) were raped 14% of the time
– Women who resisted with knives or guns were raped less than 1% of the time
Resistance to crimes of violence is more common than most people realize. Overall 71.4% of victims of violent crime took some type of self-protective measure. Such measures include screaming, running, physically fighting the attacker, and using a weapon, among other things (12). Resisting a crime by using a firearm generally reduces your chance of being hurt or killed, especially for women. A study by Gary Kleck found that the probability of serious injury in a criminal attack is two and a half times greater for women offering no resistance than women resisting with a firearm. Men are also safer if they resist with a firearm than if they do not resist at all, but the difference is smaller (1.5 times less likely to be injured) (13).
Unarmed resistance, on the other hand, does positively correlate with an increased rate of injury in most crimes. One study showed that, during a retail robbery, unarmed resisting store clerks were 50 times more likely to be killed than clerks who did not resist (14). Victims resisting robberies are 20% more likely to be injured than victims who comply with the robbers’ demands. Eighty-six percent of resisting victims are injured as compared to sixty-six percent of compliant victims (15). Presence of a weapon by the criminal does not influence injury rates. Injury rates are the same between victims attacked with weapons and victims attacked by unarmed criminals (26%), although victims attacked by armed criminals were about 3.5 times more likely to suffer serious injuries (16).
originally posted by: beezzer
I can't believe that there are people out there that would promote the "nobility" and higher morality of playing the helpless victim.
There is nothing noble, honorable, or morally correct by allowing yourself to become/remain/stay a victim.
originally posted by: NonsensicalUserName
furthermore while the producers are celebs, the actual advice-giving source appears to be a hostage-negotiator/police officer with several years experience, and who's probably more qualified than you to talk about this sort of thing.
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: TKDRL
I'll bet more often than not they don't want escalating their crimes to outright murder.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
So I blind a burglar using Wasp Spray against the manufacturers directions to protect myself... you think they won't sue you and win?