a reply to:
nancyliedersdeaddog
The elephant in the room for me,which they have never answered, is how come chemtrail believers are always merely laymen, with no particular interest
in aviation or meteorology, just regular joe or Joanne's who look up, are intrigued by something they see and start searching the Internet for an
answer, whilst everyone with any particular interest in either or both those fields, amateur or professional, finds Chemtrails to be not merely
unbelievable, but actually risible?
How come nobody makes the connection that chemtrail belief occupies a space left by a gap in their knowledge (things they don't generally need to
know, it's not a slur) that pilots, meteorologists, aviation enthusiasts etc, don't have?
This is why the photographs ALWAYS get debunked. It's because they are of nothing unusual. There are no genuine photographs of chemtrail aircraft,
despite thousands upon thousands of DSLR and super zoom lens armed plane spotters, who know EVERYTHING about their subject, taking pictures everyday.
these guys know when they see a military refuelling tanker, they know when an all-white, unliveried 757 is on lease to Jet2 and has just flown a load
of holidaymakers into Manchester from Alicante, or whatever. They don't get stupidly aggravated by such sightings because they've gone looking for
them.
If chemtrail planes were out there, the plane spotters would be the first to spot them, and pilots and genuine meteorologists wouldn't be so
contemptuous about them.
To a chemtrail believer however, there is nothing stupid at all in the theory that all pilots and meteorologists are either in on it, or know less
than them about a field they experience every single working day. The stupidest idea of thrm all is the possibility that they might actually be wrong.