It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On 29 September 2009, a military juvenile court was established by Military Order 1644 (incorporated into Military Order 1651) following mounting criticism that the Israeli military had been prosecuting children as young as 12 years in adult military courts for over four decades. Under the new order, children are still prosecuted in military courts but are now supposed to be separated from adults in most cases and tried before military judges who have been “appropriately trained”. Lawyers familiar with the military courts have identified a number of flaws with this development:
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: TheRisenPeople
Something wrong with these people.
originally posted by: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: TheRisenPeople
Something wrong with these people.
There is something wrong with that person... You're taking something stupid that a single person wrote and applying it to an entire people. None of the Israeli people I know are reveling in the death of children. No doubt there are some, but they are the exception and not the rule here.
As to the OT, I'm not going to justify the IDF's heavy handed tactics, but maybe the parents should have taught their children not to throw stones at men with guns, or anyone for that matter. I know I was raised with more sense than that.
If I was the parent of one of those children, of course I wouldn't want them in jail, but would come down on them like a ton of bricks for being so stupid. Under slightly different circumstances it could have gotten them killed.
You can bring up occupation this, oppression that, or whatever, but even considering that, it is not something for children to involve themselves in.
There is something wrong with that person... You're taking something stupid that a single person wrote and applying it to an entire people. None of the Israeli people I know are reveling in the death of children. No doubt there are some, but they are the exception and not the rule here.
You can bring up occupation this, oppression that, or whatever, but even considering that, it is not something for children to involve themselves in.
You can bring up occupation this, oppression that, or whatever, but even considering that, it is not something for children to involve themselves in.
originally posted by: Iscool
a reply to: TheRisenPeople
So the kids throw rocks at Israelis as they walk past a check point on their way to school...And then everyone whines because there is a reaction by the Israelis...What the Israelis need are guns that shoot rocks to even things out...
So the kids throw rocks at Israelis as they walk past a check point on their way to school...And then everyone whines because there is a reaction by the Israelis...What the Israelis need are guns that shoot rocks to even things out...
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
Of course I didn't mean the whole country of people ...
You can bring up occupation this, oppression that, or whatever, but even considering that, it is not something for children to involve themselves in.
Neither is getting the crap blown out of you while playing or having your entire family killed as the apartment block where you live is destroyed by an IDF airstrike. Too late not to involve children, Israel brought the war to them:
By a child from Gaza before you ask.
originally posted by: TheRisenPeople
a reply to: CommandoJoe
I whole-heartedly agree with your point about that being ONE person in the above post, nut there are numerous people saying equally horrific things, least of all the late Joan Rivers...
I also agree that the kids involved should be in for one hell of a telling when they get home to their parents, whilst I don't think the occupational forces deserve respect, they should at least be taught not to stoke the fire.
However, I don't really agree with your last point:
You can bring up occupation this, oppression that, or whatever, but even considering that, it is not something for children to involve themselves in.
The children didn't get involved, they were already involved, through no fault of their own.
As above stated, that area was supposed to be under Palestinian control, and even if it wasn't, the occupation is illegal under international law. Many of these children could well have been tear-gassed by the same very soldiers on their way to school yesterday for all we know, they almost certainly would have seen/heard of their friends/family being murdered by them. so their actions, while stupid, can be understood at best, no justified, but understood.
But yes, it could have got them killed, so they should not have provoked a force that they know to be unjust and without moral. I agree.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
originally posted by: Iscool
a reply to: TheRisenPeople
So the kids throw rocks at Israelis as they walk past a check point on their way to school...And then everyone whines because there is a reaction by the Israelis...What the Israelis need are guns that shoot rocks to even things out...
By that same token, Hamas should've been equipped with the same weapons the IDF had when they illegally destroyed Gaza (again). And then instead of Israel trying to make out like the conflict was a war, it would've been a real war then
Hamas has already proven that when they have more accurate weapons they will still target civilians
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: CommandoJoe
Funniest quote of the day:
Hamas has already proven that when they have more accurate weapons they will still target civilians
Uhm yes, you mean like the 2,500 plus Palestinians which died during Protective Edge, most of which were civilians?
Better check your feet, the ice your standing on is about to break under the weight of your excuses and self-denials.
originally posted by: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: CommandoJoe
Funniest quote of the day:
Hamas has already proven that when they have more accurate weapons they will still target civilians
Uhm yes, you mean like the 2,500 plus Palestinians which died during Protective Edge, most of which were civilians?
Better check your feet, the ice your standing on is about to break under the weight of your excuses and self-denials.
Whats so funny about what I said? And you didn't even address it, you went on to talk about Palestinian civilian deaths in Gaza...
Here's an event that backs up what I said. Whats so funny about it?
Hamas fires laser guided anti-tank missile at school bus
As to the 2500 being mostly civilians (I've seen slightly lower #'s, but we'll use your 2500), that is debatable and very hard to verify/quantify one way or the other - if it is young children and women (UN #'s for that group is 750), that's easy, but mid to late teenage males and older, there's no way to accurately tell if they are a militant or not after the fact since Hamas doesn't wear uniforms. And Hamas will of course understate their losses as more civilian deaths make Israel look bad. The only ballpark figure you have is from the IDF based on video of the air strikes and their estimate of militants taken out in said strikes which Israel pegs at 616. So roughly half of the casualties are accounted for, and again roughly, half civilian, half militants. I'm sure there are civilians in the unverified remaining half, but I bet there are militants as well. Even if there weren't, at least 25% of the total dead are militants.
You can bet if Hamas had equivalent weapons there would be many 10's of thousands of dead Israeli civilians and they wouldn't even try to avoid civilians... I know many of you here think that Israel doesn't try to avoid civilians, but if that was the case there would be a lot more dead in Gaza. I've seen #'s as high as 5000 air strikes on Gaza in the most recent conflict - That's 2 bombs/missiles for each person killed in Gaza, and that doesn't even take into account tank shells and artillery rounds. If they are trying to take out civilians that's some pretty bad aim, especially with Gaza population density being so high as everyone likes to say... Israel could drop a small nuke on Gaza and be done with it, committing the genocide that everyone thinks is happening (hint: it's not). They could take a page from the WW2 handbook and carpet bomb ALL of Gaza down to rubble killing 1 Million + Palestinians in a matter of days. Everyone likes to dump on Israel for their actions in Gaza, but I bet all of you armchair Generals couldn't find a better solution to this complex problem. The best solution would be for Hamas to disarm themselves, or for the people of Gaza to overthrow Hamas. If either of those things happened, I have no doubt Israel would go out of their way to make things better in Gaza.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like seeing civilian death on either side, but in this situation I place the blame squarely on the shoulders of Hamas. In the case of Hamas, they don't care if there are civilian deaths on their side as it serves their propaganda purposes. I just don't see how anyone cannot be against Hamas and not place some of the blame on them for the deaths in Gaza - What is Israel supposed to do when they are launching thousands of missiles into Israel? Just tell their people to put their lives on hold for a few months and hide out in your safe room (if you have one) until Hamas runs out of missiles?
Something my grandfather told me as a child while we were wrestling around comes to mind and I think applies to both situations, the rock throwing children and Hamas launching rockets, "Don't dish it out if you can't take it".
ie, Don't start a fight you can't win, or don't complain if you don't like the consequences of your actions...
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
originally posted by: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: CommandoJoe
Funniest quote of the day:
Hamas has already proven that when they have more accurate weapons they will still target civilians
Uhm yes, you mean like the 2,500 plus Palestinians which died during Protective Edge, most of which were civilians?
Better check your feet, the ice your standing on is about to break under the weight of your excuses and self-denials.
Whats so funny about what I said? And you didn't even address it, you went on to talk about Palestinian civilian deaths in Gaza...
Here's an event that backs up what I said. Whats so funny about it?
Hamas fires laser guided anti-tank missile at school bus
As to the 2500 being mostly civilians (I've seen slightly lower #'s, but we'll use your 2500), that is debatable and very hard to verify/quantify one way or the other - if it is young children and women (UN #'s for that group is 750), that's easy, but mid to late teenage males and older, there's no way to accurately tell if they are a militant or not after the fact since Hamas doesn't wear uniforms. And Hamas will of course understate their losses as more civilian deaths make Israel look bad. The only ballpark figure you have is from the IDF based on video of the air strikes and their estimate of militants taken out in said strikes which Israel pegs at 616. So roughly half of the casualties are accounted for, and again roughly, half civilian, half militants. I'm sure there are civilians in the unverified remaining half, but I bet there are militants as well. Even if there weren't, at least 25% of the total dead are militants.
You can bet if Hamas had equivalent weapons there would be many 10's of thousands of dead Israeli civilians and they wouldn't even try to avoid civilians... I know many of you here think that Israel doesn't try to avoid civilians, but if that was the case there would be a lot more dead in Gaza. I've seen #'s as high as 5000 air strikes on Gaza in the most recent conflict - That's 2 bombs/missiles for each person killed in Gaza, and that doesn't even take into account tank shells and artillery rounds. If they are trying to take out civilians that's some pretty bad aim, especially with Gaza population density being so high as everyone likes to say... Israel could drop a small nuke on Gaza and be done with it, committing the genocide that everyone thinks is happening (hint: it's not). They could take a page from the WW2 handbook and carpet bomb ALL of Gaza down to rubble killing 1 Million + Palestinians in a matter of days. Everyone likes to dump on Israel for their actions in Gaza, but I bet all of you armchair Generals couldn't find a better solution to this complex problem. The best solution would be for Hamas to disarm themselves, or for the people of Gaza to overthrow Hamas. If either of those things happened, I have no doubt Israel would go out of their way to make things better in Gaza.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like seeing civilian death on either side, but in this situation I place the blame squarely on the shoulders of Hamas. In the case of Hamas, they don't care if there are civilian deaths on their side as it serves their propaganda purposes. I just don't see how anyone cannot be against Hamas and not place some of the blame on them for the deaths in Gaza - What is Israel supposed to do when they are launching thousands of missiles into Israel? Just tell their people to put their lives on hold for a few months and hide out in your safe room (if you have one) until Hamas runs out of missiles?
Something my grandfather told me as a child while we were wrestling around comes to mind and I think applies to both situations, the rock throwing children and Hamas launching rockets, "Don't dish it out if you can't take it".
ie, Don't start a fight you can't win, or don't complain if you don't like the consequences of your actions...
Quite a novel you've written there, in the most simplest of terms without being rude:
Israel is a nuclear armed nation with a profesionally trained army, Hamas is a bunch of guys with home-made rockets sticking up for their country and nothing like a professionally trained army, furthermore, laser-guided missile? What, one report in all the 50 or so years of the Israel/Palestine conflict? Must've been a present from someone that cares about countries committing genocidal actions and they tried to provide even terms.
Get real, and another point, have you seen Palestine lately (from what it should be according to international law):