Scottish Independence, Dunblane Child Murders, The Masonic Connection.

originally posted by: uncommitted
...but then if you are English, Jewish or female then Gibson likes to do his best to demonise you.

So if you are a Zionist monster like the Queenie you are triply screwed.

Well, at least what's her name is cranking out more kids. God save them and all that. Or is it savor? Nom, nom, nom.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Wondered when you'd turn up. Welcome.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Sandra has had threats that would make your blood run cold.

Hamilton's suicide is of the 'shot himself in the head, twice' type of suicide.

You'll learn.

p.s. The desk. It has feelings too.

Oh come off it. David Icke supports Sandra Uttley. That's enough for me.

originally posted by: Kester
Wondered when you'd turn up. Welcome.

You may officially stop wondering. The red phone rang and it is my turn to do damage control.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Foregone conclusion now, I think.

No, it's not. There's going to be a hell of a battle in Scotland over these next ten days. As there should be. The referendum is a very, very, serious topic.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: network dude

The research indicates a disproportionate degree of masonic involvement. Do you have information implicating another group?

Anyway, group blame is not the be all and end all. Individual responsibility is paramount. Here's a fun bit of information. Lord Robertson was the referee on Thomas Hamilton's shotgun licence, allegedly. en.wikipedia.org...

Well then, my mistake. Could you please point me to the official reports naming the masons as at fault? What? the official report has not been released? Then I am quite confused as to how you could know ANY DAMN THING AT ALL?

It's cool to just blame a group that most don't know much about. Really, really stupid, but cool. But who needs facts when it sounds so damn juicy?

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: uncommitted

It's a word.

What word would that be? Fabricated? Populist? Non-fiction? How about a run of words like pandering to peoples dreams with no feet in reality?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: uncommitted
...but then if you are English, Jewish or female then Gibson likes to do his best to demonise you.

So if you are a Zionist monster like the Queenie you are triply screwed.

Well, at least what's her name is cranking out more kids. God save them and all that. Or is it savor? Nom, nom, nom.

My, is school out already over there? In what way is the Queen related to Israel, I assume that's what you mean? Oh dear, ATS is really having its tone lowered isn't it.

a reply to: uncommitted

It is satire dude. You know, parodying David Icke who thinks she is a Zionist Reptilian.

very disturbing
if that was happening here it would be all over the news

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Has it occurred to you that may be a ploy to discourage support for Sandra?

Check out this site, not approved by Sandra. www.dunblaneexposed.info... Run down to the comments and you'll see, after over five years of no one daring to comment it takes an ATS member to say the first word. Then the others follow. That's not nearly enough for me. I want to see more support for whistleblowers.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Vote's rigged. Battle's a charade.

a reply to: network dude

Official? Who trusts anything official these days?

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

Vote's rigged. Battle's a charade.

Prove it.

a reply to: uncommitted

Well, if we're going to go there. Edinburgh is Jerusalem. Israel was created for destruction. Churchill was a Rothschild. Etc. etc.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: uncommitted

Well, if we're going to go there. Edinburgh is Jerusalem. Israel was created for destruction. Churchill was a Rothschild. Etc. etc.

?????? Say what again????

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

It will prove itself.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: network dude

Official? Who trusts anything official these days?

Yea, your right. better to slag an entire organization with nothing but paranoid hearsay then you can scurry off to anonymity should your slander prove to be just that. Good show sport.

a reply to: Kester

This is..it's hard to know where to start. Thomas Hamilton had a grudge against some parents and took it out on their kids. He was a messed up individual -to be polite.

Particularly since we now have cops with Glocks wandering around. Are the Masonic controllers of Scotland worried we might actually do something about Dunblane?

We don't have cops with Glock 'wandering about'. That is not exactly true, is it? And who are the Masonic controllers of Scotland? Name me just one Masonic overlord of Alba.

There is no way the 'uncovering' of Dunblane (there is no conspiracy there, this Sandra woman is talking mince) will effect Scottish Independence. I'm lost, I can't begin to see the connection.
I'm sorry, I just can't agree with you on this one.

a reply to: network dude

Official reports have proven false so often it's boring. Hillsborough for example, still being raked over and used as a manipulative tool while one of the prime culprits, Assistant Chief Constable Walter Jackson, is carefully ignored.

Really. Who does trust anything 'official'?

All individuals are responsible for their actions. Organisations that encourage covert, deceitful co-operation between members drag many individuals into trouble. Best to stay out of such organisations.

Should any readers take you seriously and actually believe I have the option of anonymity, I ask only that they look over my previous threads. How could I remain anonymous as a prolific pro-constabulary activist? I lost that privilege long ago.

I ask all truthseekers and whistleblowers to take the plunge. Don't identify yourself to the general public. Just lose all fear of intelligence agencies and police. Lose all fear of being 'listed'. We are not criminals. We are the truthseekers.