Rock Hill teen says she was bullied on school bus, beat for ‘acting too much like a white person�

This is not too far from me.

Apparently the attacker is a darker skinned black girl who has been bullying the lighter skinned black girl, because she is not black enough.

She has tried to get her to fight, but apparently the victim's whitish ways extend to her not fighting. This year the bully decided to just attack her, tripped her, and assaulted her on the ground and then ran.

Why isn't this in the media spotlight? Imagine if it was reversed and the attacker was beat up for being "too black" .... they would have a field day.

www.thestate.com.../99/205/&rh=1

Makes sense, reminds me of Kozinskies "painted bird" We can't all be heads, there has to be some tails...

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Imagine if it was reversed and the attacker was beat up for being "too black" .... they would have a field day.

Nah ... it'd still be a black-on-black crime and the LSM wouldn't make a big deal of it. It's just too far from their agenda.

originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Imagine if it was reversed and the attacker was beat up for being "too black" .... they would have a field day.

Nah ... it'd still be a black-on-black crime and the LSM wouldn't make a big deal of it. It's just too far from their agenda.

Yes they would. They would twist it into how white people have convinced black people being black is bad.

War on blacks. My pasty white ass.

This (in my opinion) is just another example of the average person being led to believe that black people are supposed to act a certain way, white people are supposed to act a certain way, etc.

Where's Sharpton and the other douche at on this one?

a reply to: ChaosComplex

They're part of the problem, they would never touch this, doesn't fit their narrative.

We can't consider ourselves an advanced species until we no longer put stock into the color of ones skin. It is the ideas inside the head that matter, and no one is born with hate and prejudice but rather, one is born into a world of hate and prejudice. I think that it is vital to stop looking at the world from a perspective of who is in a particular place and instead examine what a particular place has to offer, in the form of ideas rather than resources.

originally posted by: kicked
We can't consider ourselves an advanced species until we no longer put stock into the color of ones skin. It is the ideas inside the head that matter, and no one is born with hate and prejudice but rather, one is born into a world of hate and prejudice. I think that it is vital to stop looking at the world from a perspective of who is in a particular place and instead examine what a particular place has to offer, in the form of ideas rather than resources.

Perhaps. But until we engineer the devil in the mirror out of our genetic code, being human will result in being human.

I may get flak for saying this, but while there are definitely still racist white people, I think skin color is overall more important to black people overall in America. I work with a beautiful girl who is light skinned and was bullied because she wasn't black enough.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04 its too bad stereo types are a sought after and loved cookie cutter mock personality instead viewed as a crude ill informed label and literature recognizes and plays and mocks such stereo types while also using them as a platform for drama
..

First I want more reports on "WHITE ON WHITE CRIMES" whose lack of coverage is appalling where the hell is Shawn Hannity and Rush Limbaugh on this, it is shameful that White kids not acting white.. this is news worthy dammit ..






Yeah waay too much is focused on success stories of African Americans in media,please more Black doom and Gloom porn .

When i was a young child i learned to love the sport of boxing, when i watched a bout between a black man and a white man i would always barrack for the black man because for some reason i assumed he was disadvantaged (economically) and most likely needed the win more.
I love an underdog!
Nowadays when watching a bout between a black and a white man i always barrack for the white man because i know that he is disadvantaged (physically).

originally posted by: Spider879
First I want more reports on "WHITE ON WHITE CRIMES"

And your post fails to understand anything.

Black on white. Not reported
White on white. Not reported.
Black on black. Not reported.
White on black. National coverage and the President tells us what he thinks.

No one is saying white on white should be reported. We are saying there is a double standard. There is. Why do racially motivated attacks only matter if it's white on black? Either cover all of them or none of them.

And here is a video you will love. Skip to about 1 hour 5 min in.



Now can we get back on topic?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

People fight each other all the time for stupid reasons. Which is why so called "hate crimes" are ridiculous.

Most people who are in fights "hate" each other.. But hate crimes only count if you assault a minority.

originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

People fight each other all the time for stupid reasons. Which is why so called "hate crimes" are ridiculous.

Most people who are in fights "hate" each other.. But hate crimes only count if you assault a minority.

Well in college we are taught it's actually impossible to be racist if you are black. Only white people can be racist. Not joking, sociology 101, it's part of the curriculum.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Well, hmm.. Must be right then.

State-run curriculum is always right

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
I may get flak for saying this, but while there are definitely still racist white people, I think skin color is overall more important to black people overall in America. I work with a beautiful girl who is light skinned and was bullied because she wasn't black enough.

Asked yourself why was this so why was she bullied for being Lite-skinned but if you are not interested in the history of the why!! and the divisions then all you are doing is sitting on the side lines commenting.
Lemme say this, this stuff was past down from slavery times..yes the dreaded slavery talk again and yes we gonna have a blame wyte moment, this division came from white folks who took the off springs of the slave master to the house to work ,there is a term for this they are called House Ngs the ones left in the hot field picking cotton were called field Ngs , the closer you were physically to white the better treatment and considered somewhat superior to your darker family members this often set people apart who began to internalize white folks concept of beauty,the thing is we are family and much intertwined. But there have been push back with some success but 5th ave and Hollyweird is working overtime to reverse that.

"Good & Bad Hair" From School Daze
In some countries in the Caribbean and the Spanish nations they are treated as two separate races , vicious wars were fought in Haiti and Dominican republic ,while on the American mainland they setup their own social clubs were you couldn't get in if your complexion was darker than a paper bag,it was called the brown bag test,the Garveyites with their own back to Africa movement was suspicious of the Lite-Skinned in the U.S men such as WEB Dubois with whom he had a falling out with,because of his policy of the talented 10th,which had quite a few of Lite skinned folks running things,however the line was always blurred as one would find Lite-skinned Blacks who worked hard to up lift the community while at the same time there were dark-skinned who acted like Toms , Much of the dark skinned Blacks would reject white folks standards of beauty beginning with the hair always an issue with Black women and so came the Afro and the dreadlocs that folks of all ethnic group adopted .



The Below is what media as late as the 70ts tell us who we are supposed to be, no one who grew-up under such imagery
want to be associated with the below,btw this is not unique to AAs India have the biggest market for skin whitening cream in the world Proctor and Gamble is making a killing out of skin-lightening creams,Asians especially Koreans and Chinese of means are mutilating themselves by hacking away at their noses and the eye lids to match wyfolks standards


So in essence this is who we are.

originally posted by: Spider879

Asked yourself why was this so why was she bullied for being Lite-skinned but if you are not interested in the history of the why!! and the divisions then all you are doing is sitting on the side lines commenting.

The why is because the girl is a racist and a bully. She can act as white as she wants, who cares. White people can act as black as they want. Who cares.

The Below is what media as late as the 70ts tell us who we are supposed to be

And now this bully is telling the light skinned girl who she is supposed to be.

Stop supporting bullying and racism.

originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

People fight each other all the time for stupid reasons. Which is why so called "hate crimes" are ridiculous.

Most people who are in fights "hate" each other.. But hate crimes only count if you assault a minority.

That's simply not true, a hate crime against whites is such and will be prosecuted as such that's a zombie lie.

And while I don't agree that only whites can be racist what they are saying is that black folks cannot do you harm through policies they created weather they hate you are not,they cannot stop you from getting a bank loan,tell you where you can and cannot live,restrict your right to vote etc in other words institutionalize racism , and your vid is worthless the lady have a speech impediment classy move razor.

a reply to: Spider879

Hahaha, speech impediment, no, she doesn't. CEDA is an example of Black on White racism and our PC culture.



She did not even answer the question, she did some sort of gibberish, stuttering, hyperventilating thing talking about how evil whitey is and won the National College Cross Examination Debate Association debate. Good thing she did not answer like the intelligent young lady she obviously is, she might be labelled "too white".

The question was about the War Powers Resolution and whether it was right or wrong. Here is her response.

They say the n*****s always already qu***, that’s exactly the point! It means the impact is that the that the is the impact term, uh, to the afraid, uh, the, that it is a case term to the affirmative because, we, uh, we’re saying that qu*** bodies are not able to survive the necessarily means of the body. Uh, uh, the n***** is not able to survive.

Uh, man’s sole “jabringing” object disfigure religion trauma and nubs, uh, the, inside the trauma of representation that turns into the black child devouring and identifying with the stories and into the white culture brought up, uh, de de de de de, dink, and add subjectively like a white man, the black man!

When the n*****, uh, sees these pains and suffering that he can only, uh, envision himself that he, uh, does not see another n***** that he, uh, can feel sympathy for or embrace, but rather, uh, that, a-bluh, that that otherness gets obliterated.

Uh, says that the the the way status co works is through, uh, whiteness allowing, uh, forcing other bodies to tell, uh, nearations of whiteness in, uh, the violences that whiteness does me, uh, say that that is the link that we will go for!

NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC.

A group of colleges tried to do policy only debate, as in you have to actually stay on topic. They were labelled racist and it was shut down.