Been Practicing Qabbalistic Squares for some years now

Now let me just shoot down the Spooky Gooky puritanical self absorbed folk I am sure to hear.

I have never been harmed, scared, and only shown how to protect yourself.

If you tell a lie long enough people will start to believe it. Well I cantor that with radical ideas. Before an idea is accepted it is first demonized. Only after time, which seems to heal most wounds.. can man fly on the moon.

But basically the point here is I have always had an inquisitive mind. Always asking... I never trust what elders told me. And yes that has come at a price.


So I ventured into Satanism open minded. And no its not goblins, makeups, or anything rob zombie portrays.

Satanism is of thee Self, Self reliance, Justice, In tune with nature, Death and life. Satanism Doesn't practice blood sacrifices. That would be voodoo and is unrelated.

Animals and Gentiles are sacred to Satanism. Respect for nature and the cycles. As they were pagan this would be crucial to survival.

Props and ceremonies are enhancements. They are not required but set the mood. The true power is within the mind especially ones who have all the chakras open and aligned and their kundalising rising.

The Baphomet en.wikipedia.org... isn't really associated with Satanism tho it can be, they are just symbols.

the soul infinity is represented in satanism.

666 is the Kabbalistic sun square. You vibrate a certain number of repetition on the hour of the sun for 36 days for magickal workings physical or spiritual

I made this thread because it seems like there is a lot of misconceptions and far from what you have been told my Soul is mine. You do not sell your soul. But it is like an energy exchange and you will be granted abilities if ones is willing to put in the work.
I have met younger and older some very successful. They all seem to have a level head on them. So next time you meet one not in makeup clothing's, spark up a chat. You'd be surprised.

Satan is old Jewish Term for enemy or adversary. Remember Enki, Shiva and many more deities Were around before yahweh.
The hand in all of the 3 books has chosen that Jews be the promised ones.

Anyways I spent about 2 years reading bible scholar's and their findings publications And a majority concluded that Satan went by another name.

They basically surmised that the garden of eden or IDin [sp] was of a fig tree not an apple tree. and the food they shared was not of bread iirc.


Sorry I can't remember everything I read. adapa and the south wind was adapted to adam and eve.

I understand that future generations morals and stories get adapted meet the current social constructs.



So anyways I have been doing these Qabbalisic Squares for years with great success. Ask me anything and lets do our best to not do religions proselytize

• Base Chakra: SHANISWARA, vibrated as SH-AH-NEE-SS-VAH-RR-AH
• Sacral Chakra: BHAUMAYA, vibrated as BB-AHH-UUU-MM-AH-YAH
• Solar Plexus '666' Chakra: SURYAE, vibrated as SUUU-RR-YAH-YAY
• Heart Chakra: SHUKRAYA, vibrated as SHH-UUU-KKK-RR-AH-YAH
• Throat Chakra: BUDHAAYA, vibrated as BUU-DD-HAH-AH-YAH
• Sixth Chakra: CHANDRAMASE, vibrated as CH-AH-NN-D-RR-AH-MM-AHSAY
• Seventh Chakra: GURUAVE, vibrated as GG-UUU-RR-UUU- AH-VAY



satans666squares.webs.com...

www.angelfire.com...


Basically you are channeling intense guttural tones into the meridian points. With repeated use one can power and strengthen each chakra. Remember chakras are batteries/ The bigger the charge the bigger the pull spark.

What the magick squares does is harness and channel all the energy raised in a working. The trick is to reprogram (affirmation) into the work daily. AFter work has been done whether spiritual or physical one must allow it to work and not to dwell. Set it and forget it.

You can also do a mala rosary 108 beads and vibrate a chant or mantra repeatedly. I wouldnt mix up black magick with white.

All these workings whether spiritual or physical aids in the proper glandular, emotional, physical, respiratory, sensory and so on.

So I will be happy to answer anything In can with my years of experience

Refreshing and informative thread.

S&F

a reply to: Psychonautics

thnaks brah!

To contact Soulbody please e-mail me at [email protected]. Copyright 2012. No unauthourized reproduction with out permission.
Lucifer: Mistaken for Satan for 1700 Years
If you mention the name Lucifer to someone, the first concept they come up with is Satan or the Devil or by other modern synonyms such as Prince of Darkness, Beelzebub or the Dark Lord to name a few. Out of all these names the only correct one to be associated with Lucifer is the Prince of Darkness but not for the reasons applied to him by Christians. We will discuss this later in the article but it is important to understand the background. However, the first concept that must be corrected is the notion that Lucifer is equivalent to Satan of Christian mythology. In order to do this we must first examine the beliefs of Christianity which have influenced the Western mind the most.

Judaism
Before we can understand Christianity, we must first examine its roots in Judaism. Christianity is a religion which follows the teachings of a man who is called Jesus Christ. Jesus was of Jewish lineage and was therefore a follower of Judaism, a monotheistic religion. The origins of monotheism seem to date back to Egypt where for a one hundred year period they did away with all the gods of their pantheon a chose to worship only one god called Ra who later became merged in various parts of Egypt with Atum (Atem) in Atum-Ra and by another Egyptian group who melded him with an unrelated god Amun into Amun-Ra. Ra was a god who had no image by the time full monotheism had set in and at this time many statues were defaced, literally. It is hypothesised that the Sphinx was originally a jackal in honour of Anubis and was latter modified to have a woman's face. At the time of King Tut there seemed to be a rebellion which the old gods were brought back.

I believe it was at this point when Judaism in more modern form was created by some Egyptian priest who may have been called Moses, a priest of the monotheists, who either lead his monotheistic believers out of Egypt to form a new state where they could worship one god or he brought the concept of monotheism to the Sinai. Note that both Christian and Jewish prayers end with Amen which is most likely derived from Amun-Ra. While there is no historical evidence that the Jews were ever in Egypt they are close enough that the philosophy of one god was adopted.

Since monotheists believe in only one god that one god in Judaism is Yahweh or Jehovah. This raises the issue of good and evil and how they could coexist in the world. If you examine the Old Testament, a book consisting of Jewish-lore, the book of Isaiah, verse 45:7, states:

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."

So in Jewish cosmology you can see there is only one god, Yahweh (Jehovah) and he is responsible for everything and by everything that means both good and evil. He commanded beings called angels who would act out his will both good/creative and evil/destructive.

Christianity

At the beginning of the Current Era came Jesus Christ and whether he was real or a philosophy or culmination of several Jewish prophets, a new religion started based on his teaching. Jesus Christ was not a person's name but rather a title where Jesus is most likely a Greek derivation of the Hebrew name Yeshua or Joshua and where Krystos is a Greek word meaning Anointed One as in the Sanskrit Krishna. According to Christian mythology, Jesus was the son of Joseph which would have meant his name would be Yeshua bar Yehosef (Joshua son of Joseph) as people of Judea/Galilee did not have surnames.

A Jewish prophet would not have deviated from the monotheistic one god philosophy but according to Christian philosophy he now became the Son of God yet maintaining they are a monotheist religion believing in only one god. To have a son of a god as well as a god would make it a polytheistic religion. At this point it would be prudent to explain the word god. The word god means a supernatural entity which has a belief system and rituals of worship associated with it. With translations and the rise of Christianity, this god (small g) underwent a name change from Yahweh (Jehovah) to God (capital G). This now means that when people referred to god, it was taken to mean God and that older gods were demonised. The equivalent would be for Toyota to release a vehicle called Car. If that vehicle became extremely popular then anyone who drove, let us say, a Volkswagen Jetta would be driving a false car, because it is not a Car.

From the teachings of the New Testament, Jesus was the Son of God and but there was another holy being added to the mix and that was the Holy Spirit. To recap, there is only one god but he was subdivided into three beings: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This trinity of a single being was a method of trying to maintain a monotheistic belief in what was becoming a polytheistic belief system. A holy trinity was not a new concept at all. Osiris, Isis and Horus were the holy trinity of Egypt. The Romans originally had Jupiter, Mars and Quirinus but after assimilating the Greek religion they had Jupiter, Juno and Minerva who were Roman equivalents of Zeus, Hera and Athena.

Christianity developed in the Roman Empire where there were several other religions that were gaining in popularity outside the Greco-Roman religion. The church of Isis was popular with the common folk both men and women whereas the church of Mithras was a male only religion predominantly practiced by nobles and a majority of the Roman army. Roman Emperor Constantine faced with a crumbling empire at the beginning of the 3rd Century CE looked to religion to hold it together and pick one of the three most popular religions at the time - he spun the proverbial dial and it landed on Christianity.

We're not totally sure what the Christian religion looked like at that time but after the Council of Nicaea in the 325 CE its direction was determined and was finally set in stone. The church then blended concepts of the three popular religions - Christianity, Mithraism and of Isis. The Church took iconography of Isis and Horus and turned them into the Madonna and Child, imagery which was depicted hundreds of years earlier in Egypt. However, it was Mithraism that had the largest influence on the new Christianity. This religion had been around for hundreds of years before the Current Era, and although it was a secret society in Rome, it was gaining in popularity with more public temples in the first century CE.

Mithraism
Mithraism had developed into more of dualistic patriarchal religion at that point in history. There was the Ahura-Mazda, Lord of Knowledge, and the Ahriman, Lord of Negative Thought or in simplistic terms a god of good and a god of evil who were constantly at blows. Ahura-Mazda sent to earth his only son Mithras to save the world, and he slew the bull. He celebrated his birthday on December 25 and his elder priests were known as pontiffs, who would wear red caps and carry a Sheppard's mitre. Astrology was a major theme and Mithras was associated with the Sun, and there are stories of him having supper with his twelve followers, which would be signs of the zodiac. His holy day was Sunday. If Christians were true followers of the Jewish Jesus, their holy day would be Saturday but Christians had shifted their holy day to align with the Mithraism so the Sunday became the new day of the Lord.

Angels and Demons
One more point needs to be established in this discussion in order to fully understand the concept of Lucifer and that is: what is a demon? In the Greco-Roman religion, there were the gods and man but in between, there were the daemons. A daemon was a messenger or the entity which acted on behalf of the gods but they were also beings onto their own and had free will. Also, like human beings some were good and some were bad. In Judaism, there were a set of beings that had no free will and that could only do what was dictated by Yahweh and these were the angels. Angels could be both good and destructive as was the case in Sodom and Gomorra where they levelled the two cities killing both good and bad people (Book of Genesis) but one must keep in mind that the Jewish god, Jehovah, was both good and evil. In the dualistic approach of Christianity, they could not have a being with the same name where one was good and one was bad. So the angels of Judaism became good and the daemons of the Greeks became bad or demons.

The Bad God
Once established as the state religion of Rome, in order not to ostracise the rest of the population, the Christian religion started to absorb the various elements of the other religions. Christianity went from following the monotheistic model of the Jewish religion to following the dualistic model of the Mithraic religion. The good aspects Jehovah were combined with the Ahuru-Mazda they were renamed to "God". God needed an enemy or adversary equivalent to the Ahriman and he became Satan. In order to wipe out the previous religions of Europe most of the polytheistic deities became symbols of this Satan, such as the popular god, Pan, the god of nature. When people think of Satan they imagine a man with goat's horns and goat's legs. This is none other than Pan demonised by the new Church. He carries Poseidon's trident which became the Devil's pitchfork. It is interesting to note that Jehovah is imageless like the Egyptian Amon-Ra but Satan looks like Pagan deities.

There are a few occurrences in the Old Testament of the Bible where Satan is mentioned by name however the term means the "adversary" rather than an entity and being. According to the Wikipedia article, en.wikipedia.org... there are 13 references made to Ha-Satan which would be "the satan" or "the adversary". An additional 10 are without the article Ha which would make it satan which could be personified as Satan or Adversary. King James took many liberties when translating the Bible and some of the adversaries were translated into Satan and Diabolos or Devil.
What must be understood is that in most polytheistic religions from Hinduism to Asatru, there are no deities of pure evil. There are many struggles and some gods are more mischievous than others but there is not one of true evil and there are no references to an evil deity that torments people for eternity. The images of Hades' underworld are not the most pleasant but that has probably more to do with the uncertainty around death. The fact that when you die, you are thrown into the dark cold earth where you decompose help contribute to the descriptions of the realm of Hades.

At this point it is interesting to note that Christianity has in fact become a dualistic religion. In the Greco-Roman religion there are three kingdoms which are divided between three gods. Jupiter/Zeus has the heavens (Olympia), Neptune/Poseidon has the oceans and Pluto/Hades has the underworld. In Christianity, God has Heaven and Satan has Hell. If there is only one god why does this other being have its own realm unless he is leasing it, at which point it makes the Christian God the ruler of Hell? With regards, to the term Hell it is also interesting to note that in Latin languages, Hell is a word that means inferno as in the Italian Inferno or French Enfer, where as Hell is word that is derived from Hel, the Norse goddess of the underworld. The underworld in the Asatru religion, as all Pagan religions, is a place where all the dead go - good and bad.


Who was Lucifer?
This discussion has brought us to in a roundabout manner to the topic of this essay - who is Lucifer? Firstly, Lucifer in his physical form is the planet Venus. When viewed from the Earth, the planet Venus doesn't stray far from the Sun as the furthest it can be seen is about 45° of arc on either side. When the planet Venus appears to the left of the Sun, it is the most beautiful star in the heavens during the evening. The Sun will set first leaving Venus in the sky shining extremely bright. When Venus conjuncts or opposes the Sun she disappears and then reappears on the right side of the Sun and visa versa. When Venus appears to the right of the Sun it is no longer the Evening Star as it now will rise before the Sun being a beautiful star in the morning or the Morning Star.

The ancient Greeks believed Venus to be two separate entities although ancient astrologers probably knew differently. In the Greek religion, the planet Venus was not associated with the goddess of beauty and love Aphrodite (Roman-Venus) although the association is appropriate. The Greeks gave the day star the name Eosphoros or Phosphorus which in Latin translates to Lucifer. The evening star Hesperos was Vesper in Latin. Hesperos was the son of Atlas and the goddess of the dawn Eos. Eosphorus was the son of Astreus and Eos, who also gave birth to the Four Winds. The Greeks often portrayed Phosphorus as winged with a torch leading his mother Eos's chariot.

Therefore, to recap, the planet Venus appeared in the morning to the ancients it was known as Phosphorus in Greek and Lucifer in Latin. Lucifer is derived from Lucem - light and Ferre - to bring, meaning the light bringer. In order to piece this puzzle together properly, one must understand that the darkest point of the night is just before dawn. When the planet Venus rises before the Sun, it is the brightest light in the sky at the darkest time of the day making, Venus or Lucifer, the Prince of

Darkness. What does the Prince of Darkness say to us? He says the light or enlightenment is coming - to wake up and to sleep no more. The question bears to be asked why would something that brings you illumination be bad? It is interesting to note that the time after the Roman Empire collapsed and Christianity took over Europe they entered the Dark Ages.

The website www.mythindex.com/greek-mythology/P/Phosphorus.html lists the follow places where Phosphorus/Lucifer is mentioned in the ancient texts:
• is a son of Astraeus and Eos (Hesiod Theogony. 381),
• is a son of Cephalus and Eos (Hyginus Poeticon Astronomica ii. 42),
• or of Atlas (Tzetzes ad Lyc. 879).
• by Philonis he is said to have been the father of Ceyx (Hyginus Fabulae 65; Ovid Metamorphoses xi. 271),
• He is the father of Daedalion(Ovid Metamorphoses. xi. 295),
• of the Hesperides (Servius ad Aeneid iv. 484), or
• of Hesperis, who became by his brother Atlas the mother of the Hesperides. (Diodotus iv. 27; Servius ad Aeneid i. 530.)
It should be noted that in these passages the gods are written about in a way the authors assume you know who they are and their stories. Very much like a modern person suggesting "do you expect me to walk on water?" which would be a reference to the story in Christian mythology, where Jesus walks on water. If you were not familiar with the myth, then the phrase would be wasted on you. So it seems that we do not have a real grasp of Lucifer's abilities and attributes and if there were any practices associated with him.

Lucifer in Christianity
When did Lucifer get mixed into the Christian pantheon? It seems to have been the Christian scholar Origen as well as a few others around the third century of the Current Era who took any reference to the Morning Star and equated those passages to the personification of the morning star, Lucifer. The passage was from Isaiah 14:12. A direct translation is below:

How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, "I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God;

According to www.jewishencyclopedia.com, the story is about a Babylonian King. Origen who was who would have known enough about the Roman religion applied Lucifer, the Morning Star, to the story and preceded to teach this was the adversarial fallen angel, Satan. This demonised the Roman god and Satan and Lucifer have been incorrectly equated to each other ever since. It is interesting to note the author of Revelations (written around 68CE), John of Patmos, who was an astrologer, refers to Jesus Christ to as the Morning Star in Revelation 22:16. This makes Jesus the messenger who announces the coming of Sun or God. It is a similar function of the Phosphorus/Lucifer.

While it may be difficult for many Christians to accept, Satanism is actually an offshoot of Christianity as there is no Satan in any Pagan or polytheistic religion nor in the Jewish religion for that matter. While many people have been accused of worshiping Satan through the ages and put to death, there was no real public church until Anton LaVey created the Church of Satan in 1966. All people previously accused of worshipping the Devil were either healers, Pagans or victims of opportunity.

Aradia of Italian Witchcraft
American author Charles Leland had studied witches in Tuscany, Italy at the end of the nineteenth century. There he discovered that Italian witches worshipped a trinity of Diana, Lucifer and Aradia. Diana would be the Roman goddess equivalent to Artemis, goddess of the wild and of the hunt. Lucifer was the Light Bringer. Aradia was their daughter sent to Earth to be the Queen of the Witches and help protect people from the Catholic Church. His books Aradia: Gospel of the Witches and Etruscan Roman

emains may have influenced the Wiccan and modern Neo-Pagan movements.

Author Raven Grimassi, who practices Stregaria, an Italian word for witchcraft, states in his book Italian Witchcraft that Aradia may have been a Dianic priestess in the middle-ages. However, this belief looks like it may have been a Pagan rebellion against the control of Catholic Church. It is difficult to dismiss the coincidence of how Lucifer who had now been equated to Satan for many centuries and an insignificant deity during Pagan times, rose to be part of this holy trinity of a religion. It seems that if this was a belief system it was thumbing its nose at the Church. Nevertheless, Leland`s book did start something and Aradia is called on today in many Wiccan ceremonies whereas Lucifer is not as common, again probably do to the association to Satan of Christian mythology.

Conclusion
As one can see Lucifer has nothing to do with the Christian Satan. It seems that Lucifer has been bastardised into the Christian god of Satan and any real understanding of the original god has been lost in the process of spreading the Good Word. The only the real attribute we have left is that as the Prince of Darkness Lucifer announces that the light or enlightenment is on its way. Next time you see the planet Venus in the morning sky, look up to Lucifer and ask him to open your eyes or at least just enjoy his beauty if you have the opportunity to up at that time to see Lucifer in the sky.




Sorry for thee long posts

Lost Christianities by Bart D. Ehrman
www.bartdehrman.com...



I never learned any of the things in this book in Sunday School.

a reply to: Iamthatbish

fascinating

Thank you for taking the time to post your thoughts on this!

Taking benevolent symbols/beings/events and turning them into their own power source by perverting them. I have long maintained that the "devil" took over the catholic church long ago. Destroyed Christianity/Paganism as well as many indigenous cultures their shamans etc.

I appreciate your view on Lucifer for it makes a lot of sense and I have pondered about this in the past. Next time I see him in the sky I will take your advice for we are experiencing enlightenment like never before and this battle of good/evil is approaching its epic climax, quite the time to be incarnated on this beautiful planet!

a reply to: elementalgroveagreeded and we prolly would of been hanged be at the stake.

mere years ago we could have.


I am not here to shock or convert non believers.

just let there be truth where truth is had.


the greatest lie ever told was organized religion and it's overreaching grasp. on humanity.

a reply to: kodasaufa

It truly is the greatest lie ever told.

For the evil aspect of god is quite conniving and a wonderful teacher in this never ending game of experience!

So if God/Devil are "adversaries" in the game of earthy consciousness at the least, then they are both ultimately illusions that come from what could also be called source.

What is your take on source? It is another thing I find fun to poner about. Because to me it transcend all, what gets me though is I believe that we are all a different point of consciousness withing this source, do we ever stop being that point of consciousness and merge back with source and if so do we retain that unique point when we choose to leave source?

a reply to: elementalgrove

Do you refer source as soul or essence?

Are you dedicated or a dabbler?

My personal take on source is that there is good and evil. This is inherent in nature. The strongest and fittest survive. And if you want to sit upon your highhourse and look down in pity for those that you feel are insuperior and exude grandiose than all others because you posses some sort of self diluted sense of holiness. Is that you are nothing but a insignificant grain of sand on endless oceans.

That grain of sand through time came become of the most finest silkiest smoothest grains on earth through purification.

There are 3 forms of energy and probably more. Positive which I believe is male, Negative which I believe is female and Neutral which goes both ways. plus a whole litany of others we do not fully understand.



Read War and Peace

there are parasites on all levels of planes. Better protecting one's self is a powerful way to get through life.

Energy is pretty inert, it doesn't care what it does. If anyone was out to kill me than I would say they were my enemy.

Often time you get those on high horses and get overally philosophical and express words of wisdom like "peace and Love man" and this are the Gurus or Ascended masters...

I am no less ascended than they, I just don't charge sessions over the internet or do group Kundalini gatherings. It's not that I can't, Just was told by a passed spirit not to ever use this for money. So cooking is going to be my method of income.

Plus I understand the metaphysical properties of stones and foods, so eventually I want to do a paring with all the chakras infused with sugars, salts, herbs, streemwater incased in the metaphysical properties they each have and use the wholesome ingredients as possible.

I've used amethysts and rose quarts where you make an elixir and add to the food. ppl always love it.

and thats all well and good but it has to be a two pronged approach. You must heal before you can hurt.


From the masters I've been able to pick their brains. We all come from pools of energy. That is why you will resonate or get along with certain people more than others. Often family and friends play huge roles in our development. often going back and fourth. I was told we chose to be incarnated. the problem is we often forget. We basically have a few roles. To teach others, to learn and to burn off pass life karma or at least set it free.

We are only humans, not aliens, not ghost, not bigfoot but humans and we need to be doing more humanly things.

As for source well that's debatable.

I know where my soul is going and I am prepared for what that entails. Hell is not a locked up place, you visit loved ones, enjoy memories visit all parts of the galaxy. Think of it like an Onion with like 10 dimensions. As above so Below.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Oh just so you Know I am a Spiritual Warrior.

I have been working for years on Kundalini, tantric and hatha Chi, Qigong, Meridians, Ao, Huna and a bunch of others. Some I don't think have names.

Reiki IMO is the laments verson. Any soccer mom seems to be one now

So all in all I am a Spiritualist.

a reply to: kodasaufa

I think in the context I was thinking, I was going for essence, for soul to me would be an individual aspect of source that plays in the land of source!

Am I a dabbler or dedicated? That is an interesting question, I have spent the better part of 12 years now looking into eastern philosophy and exploring altered states of consciousness. Throughout all of this, I have come to believe that we are in the process of learning the myriad lessons we came here to learn and in that good/evil loses its meaning to an extent. There is that underlying unity, with out one the other could not exist, so it is for each individual to choose their path. I think that some of the best teachers are our "enemies" We all came from the same source and have the same spark of life within us.

More than any other philosophy I was influenced the most by Taoism. What I took away from the Tao is to be like a child. Spontaneous creativity, never ending wonder, the ability to flow with life around you. We all lost this innocence, some more than others, and I have spent my years cultivating that expression of life again with the added benefit of experience.

I have come to the conclusion, with great assistance from one of my favorite philosophers (ALan Watts) to approach life, like a dance and we all know that the only bad dancers are the ones who take it seriously! So I do believe that I am dedicated, but with the attitude of a comedian.

I like that you pointed out the pseudo-spirtualists that are out there, lording their holier than thou attitude over all of the ignorant masses! This is the sign of somebody who had acquired megalomania and as you put it, deluded themselves. We are all here, exactly where we need to be to learn whatever it is that we wish. Some of us came and are at a point in remembering who we are, and this remember or lack of results in actions some of us would not wish to partake in. However the simple concept that has been lost on the mainstream Christian culture (thou shalt not judge) I have found to be imperative on my path!

I also know where my soul will be going, well that is to say I have a pretty good idea of this.

Also I like the idea of a Spiritual Warrior. I would like to heal myself and than offer healing to others. As such I have begun the path of yoga,Qigong, and Reiki. I totally understand what you mean with the laments version of Reiki, you can pay whomever and get your masters even with you blockages still intact.

I would like to friend you, if you do not mind sharing aspects of your path and perhaps advice on Kundalini and Tantric, as well as the others, I appreciate all input in awakening my awareness of the subtle energies flowing around our total organsim and I feel that you have valuable input!!

Namaste Aloha

a reply to: elementalgrove


Your essence shall and will always be your essence, just with some baggage or less along the way.

We are all a part of this carnation but I'd like to add that not all those around us want us to succeed and have a vested interested in our detriment. Perhaps subconscious. These are the nay sayers to whom I wish To avoid. If someone isn't on your side they are in your way. And not to sound totalitarian but life is so short and precious one can't be distracted by naysayers.

If it wasn't for some caveman eating certain fungi our brain expansion and awareness along with meat which has essential proteins we may have not developed like we have.

Evil is relative. One of the most evil scientist to date could be considered Warner von braun And J.P. Oppenheimer But they were the good guys fighting for freedom and all that is pure. Take it with a grain of salt.

I immersed myself in both East and West and drew to the conclusion they each have the practices and methods. Those some imbiotic and asinine but that is an opinion

From what I understand about Taoism is a solid service, with its flaws like any. More over to the point is that it give you grace and solitude.


Ya all these Burning man Pseudo peace figures really muck it up for people who respect it and has been passed down traditions. These folks come over night spewing the world.

Just remember this, a real healer will never charge. They would appreciate a donation no matter how small it be, but they do not seek financial gains, the real ones don't charge. Now would I ask


Ask away, is there anything you interested in? I could do a natal birth chart (time and location must be exact)

I could open blocked chakras if you do have any.

I can stimulate your kundalini up and out of your crown and I can flow Chi to directed areas.


feel free to ask anything and I am no master, just a practionarer.


ohh ya watts is sick.

a reply to: kodasaufa

Just a quick question.

In one of my past lives I was a shaman in a hunter gatherer society, I performed my role and my needs were taken care of.

Yet in this life I'm supposed to starve doing the same work? How does that work?

I would also like your input into the myths about Lucifer and the fallen angels, from that perspective, he is not merely a planet. Of course, this also goes further back to even older traditions, we could talk about Melek Taus for one, as well as the Theosophists, they would call Lucifer and the fallen angels "Solar Angels", highly advanced souls that came here millions of years ago to work with the less spiritually advanced souls on this planet.

I would very much like to hear your views on these perspectives.

a reply to: TheLaughingGod

well honored to have you here.

Do you know what your solor and lunar rising are. iirc its the ones when you are in the womb or soon after and are related to the eclipses. A lot of what I've read made a ton of sense regarding this incarnation.

Maybe you are on the taking end of Karma? Perhaps it will develop your soul in the long run, going without and learning how to have nothing if that makes any sense. What is it you do for work if I may ask.

You can also do karma cleanses and karmic work to offset the hardships it brings.

MYTHS are myths they are like harry potter stories. Who actually really knows what happened and who was all there.

I think you might be referring to the Nephilim.

Darkness is light turned inside out.

There has and will always be a dark one.

Tho personally I don't think ENKI, SHIVA etc is actually dark. Just portrayed

a reply to: kodasaufa

I've gotten Vedic astrology readings before and they were spot on but they were based on my birthday.

I have been on the taking end of karma, but it was needed, things are better now though.

I don't do any psychic work right now but I am thinking about working as a tarot reader in the future, my only gripe about it is what you mentioned earlier, to not make money off of these kinds of gifts, so I'm conflicted about it. But at the same time, when you compare it to the life of the shamans of the old days they were being taken care of by the tribe, and you have to eat, even if you're a medium, doing that kind of work takes a lot of energy, gotta have money to survive, it would be the same thing except these days we need money to function in society, so I don't really see the huge difference.

The Nephilim were the giants or the men of renown as far as I know, the offspring of these fallen angels, which to me makes it sound like they were aliens. They taught mankind most necessities of civilisation.

Me neither, I believe enlightened beings take wrathful forms when necessary.

Good talk, just about to read your new thread on Kundalini. See you around.