It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Last I checked Palestinians tried to steal Israel's land, and they failed. Then they refused to make peace.
I must have missed that. When did this happen?
originally posted by: Quauhtli
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Using bottle rockets as an example implies that they hardly do any damage, it should be obvious what I meant by it.
Meanwhile even though Israel has the wherewithal to react responsibly and make precise counterattacks, they willfully destroy thousands of innocent civilians without blinking, knowing full well the game plan of Hamas. They are in the wrong and they act out of hate against a people that are helpless to defend themselves.
My original post was meant to imply that there is no impending doom coming down on Israel as they have the means to crush just about any army on that side of the world, yet they are crying for more aid for their military? This idea is ridiculous, which is why I used my words loosely.
originally posted by: Quauhtli
You're obviously well educated on the history in this region and I'd love to hear more of your arguments but I can't take any more of your disrespectful twisting of my words. Using "vile" and "disgusting" to paint me and my opinions?
Israel has one of the most competent armies in the world, if not THE most. I'd like to see them take out every top guy in Hamas without killing a single innocent soul. I know they could get damn close to doing it if they wanted.
You're defending a nation that is clearly in the wrong and painting me the wrong color in the act. I absolutely think that Hamas needs to be wiped out, I just think that Israel should be more responsible about it.
Hamas is impotent against Israel, it's a well know fact, I'm not trying to minimize the threat at all. Go back and look at the pics you posted, then come back and tell me it's not packaging tape. I can bet you whatever it is Israel doesn't have it taped all over their rockets, ever, not even for shipping. Really it's beside the point, but those missiles probably would have been trashed in WW1 by any respectable army.
Again, I think Israel does use their military extremely effectively in other countries, but they seem to be leveling Palestine with no thought whatsoever to civilian casualties. They know full well that warning people before the fact doesn't work because there is almost nowhere for the palestinians to run.
The Arab Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine, contradicts the notion that the Arab League was bent on a genocidal attack, threatening to drive all Jews into the sea. To be sure they were against Israel’s existence, based on legal grounds, but their Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine says: “The Governments of the Arab States emphasise, on this occasion, what they have already declared before the London Conference and the United Nations, that the only solution of the Palestine problem is the establishment of a unitary Palestinian State, in accordance with democratic principles, whereby its inhabitants will enjoy complete equality before the law, [and whereby] minorities will be assured of all the guarantees recognised in democratic constitutional countries, and [whereby] the holy places will be preserved and the right of access thereto guaranteed.
Democracy!! Equal rights!! How dare they! Nowhere did the Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine threaten Israel or threaten to actually institute the legal basis of their argument. It merely stated the legal case as a basis for protecting their ward as regional powers per the UN Charter. Israel was no longer a part of Palestine on the 15th May 1949. The Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine was given to the UNSC, making the war a legally declared defensive war. Which is why there is no UNSC resolution condemning it.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Flatcoat
Maybe you should.
To be sure they were against Israel’s existence
Your post just proved my point, thanks.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Flatcoat
Maybe you should.
To be sure they were against Israel’s existence
Your post just proved my point, thanks.
And your post just proved you didn't actually read the link I provided.
the only solution of the Palestine problem is the establishment of a unitary Palestinian State
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Flatcoat
Maybe you should.
To be sure they were against Israel’s existence
Your post just proved my point, thanks.
And your post just proved you didn't actually read the link I provided.
Actually I did. He uses logical fallacies and it flat out states exactly what I said. They wanted to take the land and prevent a Jewish State. Again, thanks for the backup, it's everything I said and more.
the only solution of the Palestine problem is the establishment of a unitary Palestinian State
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Flatcoat
Maybe you should.
To be sure they were against Israel’s existence
Your post just proved my point, thanks.
And your post just proved you didn't actually read the link I provided.
Actually I did. He uses logical fallacies and it flat out states exactly what I said. They wanted to take the land and prevent a Jewish State. Again, thanks for the backup, it's everything I said and more.
the only solution of the Palestine problem is the establishment of a unitary Palestinian State
Whoosh..straight over your head huh? The point is that there was no Arab League invasion of Israel. Try reading it again.
If the Arab League had launched a war of aggression on Israel’s newly Declared Sovereign Boundaries, there would be the customary UNSC resolution condemning it. Right?
The Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine was given to the UNSC, making the war a legally declared defensive war. Which is why there is no UNSC resolution condemning it.
originally posted by: Quauhtli
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Using bottle rockets as an example implies that they hardly do any damage, it should be obvious what I meant by it.
Hamas is impotent against Israel, it's a well know fact, I'm not trying to minimize the threat at all.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: QuestioningAuthority
When you steal someone's land and then cage the people whos land you stole and go on to call them terrorists for fighting back then absolutely everything you say is null and void, someone needs to put a net around yahoo.
Same goes for most western countries who have attempted to do the same thing to Muslim's all around the world, you cant steal someones land, kill their family, blow up their house/country and expect no retaliation.
How have we let these imbecilic western governments get away with this, and to this very day they continue in an attempt to advance their masonic/Zionist cause. So sad that there are still some trigger happy cowboys who are willing to carry out the agenda of those masonic/Zionist creeps who are milking everyone with less money than themselves
Last I checked Palestinians tried to steal Israel's land, and they failed. Then they refused to make peace.